|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 4:24 pm
Herr Kaiser Matthelm Oh no, it keeps going! Just got this last night at record and tape traders  i got it a few weeks ago on vinyl. tis good
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:56 pm
Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 10:06 am
Can anybody tell me what vinyl are? I mean do they have different sound qualities of different songs?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 11:54 am
I don't understand what you are asking
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 7:30 pm
metal studded warrior Can anybody tell me what vinyl are? I mean do they have different sound qualities of different songs? records. you know, those big old wax platters they used to use for music in the 50s, you put it on a turntable and drop a needle on it, and it spins in the grooves and translates that into sound through your speakers. and yes, they do have better sound quality.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:34 pm
ashlander_alpha Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.In other words it's not worth the extra space it takes up.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:37 pm
Gravechylde ashlander_alpha Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.In other words it's not worth the extra space it takes up. That depends on how much of an music elitist you are/how much hard drive space you have razz
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:39 pm
Herr Kaiser Matthelm Gravechylde ashlander_alpha Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.In other words it's not worth the extra space it takes up. That depends on how much of an music elitist you are/how much hard drive space you have razz But if someone that much of an elitist, why not use the smaller bit rate and have even more music?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 1:41 pm
Gravechylde Herr Kaiser Matthelm Gravechylde ashlander_alpha Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.In other words it's not worth the extra space it takes up. That depends on how much of an music elitist you are/how much hard drive space you have razz But if someone that much of an elitist, why not use the smaller bit rate and have even more music? You can still have a ******** of music. Hell, I got about 400 gb free. That's about 4 times my current music collection.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 4:07 pm
Herr Kaiser Matthelm Gravechylde Herr Kaiser Matthelm Gravechylde ashlander_alpha Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.In other words it's not worth the extra space it takes up. That depends on how much of an music elitist you are/how much hard drive space you have razz But if someone that much of an elitist, why not use the smaller bit rate and have even more music? You can still have a ******** of music. Hell, I got about 400 gb free. That's about 4 times my current music collection. eek give me some?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2008 5:43 pm
Gravechylde ashlander_alpha Gravechylde Wow, That is a lot bigger. I don't see the point in files that large though, I've never noticed that big of a difference between a CD and and mp3 (or even between different bitrates really). I have noticed a difference between 128 and 256 kbps bitrates, but they're very slight and you have to listen to the same song a lot of times on one to tell.In other words it's not worth the extra space it takes up. Oh, well yes. A 12 or 13 song album generally goes past 100 Mb in size at 256. I still buy most of my music on CDs, though, so it matters little to me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|