|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 8:19 pm
GUMMIBEAR FIZZ 98/100
Question one
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
Gummi's profile is for sure interesting to look at, I want to stay in it as long
as humanly possible. The colors are pretty to look at, it's soothing, and the animation is great
20/20
Question Two
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile; autoplay , miss-coded
sections.
none that I notice
20/20
Question three
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
Great amounts of effort seem to be placed into this design, everything from the background, to the content seems to be perfect.
20/20
Question four
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
everything is accessible to me, lots of content, user bar easy to find, plenty of links, it's perfect really.
20/20
question five
Did the user create something worthy of a finale round, is it the best they could do,
or does it seem to be lacking in value?
I find it to be the best of this contest as far as her profiles go, everything the judges have said seems to be paid attention to, and fixed, it really is great.
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
bravo
simply bravo
FINAL SCORE 100/100
Question one
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
Yes, it is definitely appealing. =w=
The main oddity with the profile is that there are uneven levels of blendedness (totally a word D;).
The main place where this comes into play is with the page header. Everything on the profile is all blended nicely, and then the header just sits there like a block of wood. I recommend lowering the opacity on the header and/or adding a background to the header that flows with the profile.
This is also evident in the Links section, although it is less apparent because it blends better.
15/20
Question Two
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile; autoplay , miss-coded
sections.
If you put your cursor under the link section and scroll using the scrollball on the mouse, the comments section scrolls. You can fix this by putting the padding-right on the #comments dl instead of #comments so that like the #comments dl scrollbar is hidden in the #comments section and therefore does not extend beyond the comments section. If that makes sense. .___.
19/20
Question three
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
Yes, effort was definitely put into the layout. <3
20/20
Question four
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
Yeah, for the most part. 8D
20/20
question five
Did the user create something worthy of a finale round, is it the best they could do,
or does it seem to be lacking in value?
IT IS WORTHY KUFUFUFU. KING MUKURO APPROVES.
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
The animation is sexy~ 8D
FINAL SCORE 94/100
Question one
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
The thing that strikes me about this profile is the same factor that makes it very appealing, in the fact that it doesnt look like a gaia page at all. Most of the sections are custom and the layout is unique yet corporate enough to be used on a website of its own
20/20
Question Two
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile; autoplay , miss-coded
sections.
There is nothing flawed with the profile, everything is as it should be
20/20
Question three
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
This profile can be compared to a tapestry, in that every detail of this profile is critical to the design. It goes without saying there was no effort spared
20/20
Question four
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
The content and userbar is entirely accessible, with any and all text in the profile clear and readable.
20/20
question five
Did the user create something worthy of a finale round, is it the best they could do,
or does it seem to be lacking in value?
This profile is incredibly intricate, with soft colours and subtle tones, in essense it is the exact opposite of Radio's profile (making it rather difficult to compare the two), overall its stunning how elaborate this profile is
Favorite part: The contact buttons, I like the 4 letter words being split up with the subtext
Least favorite part: As a mentioned this profile is incredibly complex, if anything were to be changed the profile wouldnt be what it is, and it is through its extremely detailed design that it is able to discern flaw.
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Hotter than my blazing ego!
100/100
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 9:42 am
RADIOCARBON 97.3
Question one
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
it is really appealing, it reminds me of the old school story books kinda, sort of a pooh feeling, which is awesome.
the colors are calm on the eyes and it's rather simple
However it's not a profile with much to explore, it's simple, it has content however so it's fine in my book
20/20
Question Two
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile; autoplay , miss-coded
sections.
other then a few minor flaws with the actual graphic nothing
as far as the actual graphic flaws, I notice it doesn't seem to line up at the bottom if you know what I mean.
One thing I really dislike is the top gaia nav bar.
just that color green really irks me on the nav bar.
if anything I would have used a blue color, and perhaps just kept the regular font color.
18/20
Question three
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
I think a great amount of effort was placed into it, everything looks well thought out and planned
20/20
Question four
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
All content is accessible, user bar is easy to find, and right in the eye of the viewer
20/20
question five
Did the user create something worthy of a finale round, is it the best they could do,
or does it seem to be lacking in value?
I really think so, effort seems to be placed into it, she used what advice we gave her in the past and made a great profile.
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Ummm I love your vectors and stuff, you do a great job of content, typography, and cute.
FINAL SCORE 98/100
Question one
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
Yes~ it is visually appealing. 8D
I would like to point out one thing however. The inner body of the tree seems very muted compared to the outside.
A solution to this could be altering the color distribution. Like you could put the light blue from the background into the body of the tree.
However, I know that with vectors that paint a scene more colors isn't always the best option. If you don't do the color distribution route, then try altering the contrast. This is the main reason that the profile looks muted; the content of the tree is a lot more subtle and less contrasting than the outside. The low opacity effect on everything makes it appear dull. Instead of the low opacity thing, try using #7f4613 as the non-hover text color and #6f3b0d as the hover text color. Or something like that. ;3;
15/20
Question Two
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile; autoplay , miss-coded
sections.
I don't see anything.
20/20
Question three
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
Yes, definitely. To the first&second questions. ;D
20/20
Question four
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
Everything is very accessible. It's nice how everything was set up.
20/20
question five
Did the user create something worthy of a finale round, is it the best they could do,
or does it seem to be lacking in value?
IT IS WORTHY KUFUFUFU.
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Super great as always. ;D
FINAL SCORE 95/100
Question one
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
The profile is bright and appealing. The colours are bold and the profile itself is an interesting portrait of a scene brining life to the profile. It has a cute theme and a proffesional edge with the typography.
20/20
Question Two
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile; autoplay , miss-coded
sections.
There is nothing flawed with the profile, everything is as it should be
20/20
Question three
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
There is no doubt that effort has been placed into this profile, the user has even set her avatar to match the colour scheme. The profile has been balanced perfectly with its tones and content.
20/20
Question four
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
The content and userbar is entirely accessible, with any and all text in the profile clear and readable.
20/20
question five
Did the user create something worthy of a finale round, is it the best they could do,
or does it seem to be lacking in value?
The profile is a wonderpiece of flair and decor. Its cute art and vibrants colours boldly create a center for the page as a medium of its content.
My favorite part of this profile: The comment buttons. Bordering the comments section with the add and view buttons itself was a stroke of genius.
Least favorite part: The bears like a little squiggly compared to the sleek and clean cut layout.
19/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Hotter than a halo for 2k!
99/100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:13 pm
The winner and champion of the summer heat contest is non other then:
*drum roll please*
GUMMIBEAR FIZZ
way to go gummi.
and wow what a great last round the ending scores where
98 to 97.3
bravo bravo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
