|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 4:00 pm
Quote: Well, we can't dwell on the past. Who cares why or how the words came to have vulgar meanings? The fact is that they do, and when people say them, we know exactly what they mean. First of all, you don't have to "dwell on the past" to have knowledge and understanding of it. And in many cases understanding the past will prevent you from making repetative mistakes. The question on the table of this conversation is "what makes cussing so bad in people's eyes", as asked by the original poster. The answer is a historical one...not a biblical one. Quote: I personally look at it from the point of view that it shows lack of character when people curse. And I generally believe that people who judge other people based on their differences are arrogant, rude and worse of all ignorant. I respect those who use cuss words, and know their history as more intelligent than people who shun these words, ebcause that is what they were taught by their parents. Quote: I mean, they don't sound pleasant. So we should use only words that are pleasant to your ears? If that were true, then what of other words that have nasty sounds? I could use without the word Phlegm myself, but that isn't an exucse to be judge other people who use that word. Quote: I don't think highly of people who curse left and right. Surely, they could find a more intellectualway to state their feelings. Communication is communication. Having a well thought out arguement, makes a thought intellectual...not the manner in which you communicate it. Quote: The question to me is not why we do or don't like it, but why we do it. Do we do it because our friends do? Even if this statement is true, how can you argue that it is any different then people who originally shunned these words, to make themselves seem more important and of higher class then they were? Both arguements are a form of using speech to "fit in", so what makes one more superior to the other? This arguement, rather you realize it or not, is proving the point I made with my historical statements. You belive it is not alright to cuss, because it has been taught from generation to generation...anyone who does not believe in this teaching is "only trying to be cool" or " not intelligent"..and therfore worthy of "being looked down on". By the arugement you are presenting issues, such as racism and domestic abuse, are alright. Because that's what people were taught, without regards to when it started or why it started..and so it should just be accepted as truth...........that's very arrogant.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 6:39 pm
Yes, it is very arrogant.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:01 pm
razorgod Because that's what people were taught, without regards to when it started or why it started..and so it should just be accepted as truth....... I never said that. I said that these days, certain words, regardless of their origins, have certain accepted meanings, most of them, in modern times, derogative, and that many people do not care that they were once completely different. The fact is that thye've become different, and what they once were is irrelevant now. Hey, it's only what I've been taught. Perhaps I was taught by arrogant people. Perhaps I'm not arrogant, but ignorant.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:26 am
windswept_fury The fact is that thye've become different, and what they once were is irrelevant now. It's not irrelevant. And it's the same arguement that perpetuates stupid ideas like racism. "It's what I was taught", there comes a time when we must unlearn what we have learned. There comes a time when we must think for ourselves, and learn the truth. Look around at how Christians are being treated these days. It seems as if it is being taught that our beliefs are "vulgar", so much so that they are trying to eliminate this kind of speech in places where the unbeliever "could be" exposed to our teachings. The same way certain words have been deemed vulgar and deemed distasteful for the public ear. Think I'm stretching things? In the last 20 years, we've seen prayer taken from schools...we've seen the banning of certain religious icons from state property...in certain cities around the country, door to door ministries can be considered harrasment and when persistant, even assault. There is now talk about removing "Under God" from our pledge.... Jesus and God are becomming our new dirty words....and don't you find it funny that the same people who are lsahing out about Jesus, are trying to teach tolerance for the other religions, yet they show no tolerance for ours? I didn't mean to turn this into a sermon, but this train of thought it what is hurting people in their walk with God, and pushing people further away from the light of the truth. It starts with small words, and ends with bigger and more important issues. Like God.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 5:55 am
razorgod It's not irrelevant. And it's the same arguement that perpetuates stupid ideas like racism. How so? razorgod "It's what I was taught", there comes a time when we must unlearn what we have learned. There comes a time when we must think for ourselves, and learn the truth. Yes, but at 14, I don't think that's necessesary. Perhaps I'm not mentally ready? I still believe in what I've learned. razorgod Look around at how Christians are being treated these days. It seems as if it is being taught that our beliefs are "vulgar", so much so that they are trying to eliminate this kind of speech in places where the unbeliever "could be" exposed to our teachings. The same way certain words have been deemed vulgar and deemed distasteful for the public ear. Think I'm stretching things? In the last 20 years, we've seen prayer taken from schools...we've seen the banning of certain religious icons from state property...in certain cities around the country, door to door ministries can be considered harrasment and when persistant, even assault. There is now talk about removing "Under God" from our pledge.... Jesus and God are becomming our new dirty words....and don't you find it funny that the same people who are lsahing out about Jesus, are trying to teach tolerance for the other religions, yet they show no tolerance for ours? You think I don't know that? razorgod I didn't mean to turn this into a sermon, but this train of thought it what is hurting people in their walk with God, and pushing people further away from the light of the truth. It starts with small words, and ends with bigger and more important issues. Like God. You didn't turn this into a sermon. I'd hardly call this anything near a sermon. So, you're basically saying that because of my views, I'm questioning God?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 6:58 am
windswept_fury razorgod It's not irrelevant. And it's the same arguement that perpetuates stupid ideas like racism. How so? An idea or belief starts as one person making an affirmation, whether it be that certain words are "dirty" or that certian skin tones are "bad", it gets taught over and over and over, until eventually it becomes an accepted "truth". I use racism as an example, because it was a set of, at one time, dominant beliefs, that we had to "reeducate" ourselves on. And because, like language, it was a value based on class. Quote: Yes, but at 14, I don't think that's necessesary. Perhaps I'm not mentally ready? I still believe in what I've learned. What age is the right age, in your opinion, to stop taking anything your told to heart as truth? When do you think you should start learning things for yourself? I was raised in a Christian household, where a lot of the beliefs were "conservative" at best. Which is to say, noone could ever adequately explain anytihng to me. It was always told to me, to take it all in faith. Sometimes that isn't enough. I had to find Him for myself...but I tell you this. Because I found my faith and tested my beliefs by the fire of truth and the words of the skeptics...my love and trust in God is unshakable. Sometimes, when you think about this stuff for yourself, you end up at the same place. Like in my walk of faith. And sometimes you find a part of the story you were never shown before....not intentionally mind you...but because somethings don't get taught, you're just expected to believe it's true. Quote: You didn't turn this into a sermon. I'd hardly call this anything near a sermon. So, you're basically saying that because of my views, I'm questioning God? I didn't say anything remotely close to that. I'm saying, that when people just take what they are told at face value, and never learn for yourself the truth, that they propagate beliefs based on lies...rather than truth. They convince themselves that the teaching is valid, or else it wouldn't have been taught for so long. And that just isn't true, it lasts so long because people believe what they want to believe. The topic is over language, but it's applicable to issues like race and religion. Which is why I have used those issues as examples.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 7:10 am
I think the proper age to look at different topics in new ways is when I begin to question them, whenever that may be. I don't just take what I hear and except it as truth, I accept as truth what I believe in my heart. In this case, it just happens to coincide with what I've already been taught, it's not because I"ve not thought it through. Just because it's not what you believe doesn't mean it's automatically wrong. That's a very arrogant view to take yourself.
I don't believe what I want to believe, I believe what I think is right, what makes the most sense according to the Bible, and, in this case, what I've been taught. I've not been forced to cxonvince myself of anything. I'm sorry your views and mine don't agree, but that doesn't make you any better or worse a Christian than I because of it.
Now, I can see faintly the way this applies to race, though your explanation was loose and weak, but I cannot see how this could apply at all to religion, lest you mean it could apply to the hindu caste system, though that's irrelevant.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:31 am
Quote: I think the proper age to look at different topics in new ways is when I begin to question them, whenever that may be. But that's kind of the issue at hand, isn't it? If you never make a conscious decision to question things you've been taught, then you continue to "teach" the same things...whether or not these things are true or not. In this case, people are claiming that certain words are sinful...and that just isn't true. The words themselves are innocent. It's the manner in which they are used that is at question. The only thing that has made them "taboo" words, is a historical bias towards a certain class of people that started hundreds of years ago. Not the bible. Those words, were most likely never even used in biblical times. Quote: I don't just take what I hear and except it as truth, I accept as truth what I believe in my heart. In this case, it just happens to coincide with what I've already been taught, it's not because I"ve not thought it through. Do you really think the "feeling in your heart" came before any kind of teaching, in this issue? Everything you believe, you have learned. You aren't born with knowledge like "cussing is wrong" or "stealing is wrong", watch a little baby growing up. When they get to that speaking age, they'll repeat anything....especially the cussing. It isn't until we teach them not to, that it becomes a lesson, and something to be considered. Ever seen a baby just snatch something out of someone's hand? If you've spent time with babies you have...and what do we tell them? NO!!!! Because they don't understand property and respecting other people's property. Do we get really mad at them? Of course not, they're just babies. They're "learning". Same is true with this issue, you've felt in your heart what you've been taught, beause that's what you've no doubt been taught all your life. Babies just arebn't born with this kind of knowledge, their environment is what shapes them into who they become. Quote: Just because it's not what you believe doesn't mean it's automatically wrong. That's a very arrogant view to take yourself. In the case of langauge, I don't believe anything. I KNOW. I KNOW that history teaches us, that upper class englishmen (the wealthy) looked down upon the lower clases (the peasants). I KNOW that they were not treated as equals, and everything about them disgusted the upper class (generally). I KNOW, that the roots of labeling certain words as Vulgar (or at least the modern day ones) started there. And I know the teaching followed the wealthy immigrants to America, where it was spread and has become a social issue in the modern day. I understand history and how things get taught...that's not arrogance. That's education. It's arrogant to say that history doesn't matter. History is EVERYTHING. History is how we learn, if it doesn't matter, then we've learned nothing. And are doomed to make the same mistakes over and over again. As Christians, History is especially important to us. Quote: I don't believe what I want to believe, I believe what I think is right, what makes the most sense according to the Bible, and, in this case, what I've been taught. This statement is so flawed that it isn't even funny. If you didn't "think" something was right, then you certainly wouldn't "believe" that something is right. And so if your thoughts dictate what's right, then your "believing what you want to believe". Aside from the the fact that it seems you are accusing me of "picking and choosing" my beliefs, but I'll dismiss that on the grounds of straying from the heart of the discussion. Quote: I've not been forced to cxonvince myself of anything. I'm sorry your views and mine don't agree, but that doesn't make you any better or worse a Christian than I because of it. Belief built on knowledge, is "stronger" than belief built on teaching. I've heard a lot of Christians try and pass off arguments that they were "taught" only to have it torn apart from under them, because that foundation wasn't built on knowledge, but on secondhand thought. Am I saying that I'm a better person in Christ? Absolutely not, we're both brothers and sister before the eyes of the Lord. But when it comes to defending my faith, I'm willing to bet I can defend mine better than you can dfend yours. If it's built on "It's right , because I know it's right..." That's not good enough for Satan, and how can you ever win atheist hearts for Christ with an arguement like that? (By the way, this isn't an attack on you at all. People view our beliefs as weak, and it's because a large body of Christians have weak arguements. And unfortunately, it's our duty as soldiers for Christ to win these hearts for Him, how can we win them if we can't convince them of the truth?) Quote: Now, I can see faintly the way this applies to race, though your explanation was loose and weak, If my explanation was "loose", it's only because this topic has nothig to do with race. But if you think it's a weak arguement to say that racism is taught in the home, and usually spans generations in teaching...then by all means you tell me how it is that racism continues to thrive? Quote: but I cannot see how this could apply at all to religion, lest you mean it could apply to the hindu caste system, though that's irrelevant. You don't? OK, well I'll stick to the topic and try and explain better. 1st, some woman in the middle ages hear some peasants talking, and hears one use a word to describe sex, use your imagination, she then turns in disgust at the peasants, walks away and passes along the story of the "vulgar" peasant. Then the other nobles begin to notice how their peasants talk, not just the words they use...but the topics as well. (This wasn't just true in the way peasants talked, but everything about the pesaants form their clothes to their bathing habits.) 2nd, certain topics of discussion are forbidden from noble homes, and are underlined by the banning of certain words...which usually accompany these topics of discussion. 3rd, peasants in an effort to please their masters, begin instructing their children that speaking in such manners is considered vulgar.....This thought process begins to spread... 4th, eventually people start using the bible to justify this teaching. And now, people tend to think these words are sins. Although the only scriptture can use is one that preaches against hateful speaking, which thesde words are not always used in a derogatory fashion. Or one on Swearing...which has absolutely nothing to do with certain words...rather than using the name of God, Heaven, a King, yourself or a family member...as a basis for truth...For example, I swear by my mother's grave...." But that's another issue that is ripe for discussion on historical context and understanding.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 6:15 am
Well, tell you what: There's really no point in argueing further, since you're not going to change my views, and I really can't afford to continue, seeing as to how I'll scarcely be around for.. about 2 or 3 weeks. (My church is doing this HUGE thing called The Journey, it's an interactive play, that's reallyhard to explain, but we're expecting 2 million people to come this year. Since it runs 10 days starting this Wednesday, from 6 at night til who-knows-when - we send them through in several smaller groups of 25-35 people - and I'm acting every night, the only breaks being next Monday and Tuesday, I've really got no time for Gaia, with homework piled on top. I'll still try to get on, but I'd hate to slow our arguement. So, since we've both put in more than our two cents, say what you may, but my part in the arguement is over. You win.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 7:53 pm
It was never about winning, you're right I'm wrong, kind of thing. Nothing with me is. We're part of one family, as Christians, we can't afford to challenge one another. I don't think our Heavenly Father would be pleased with "arguements" amongst family...I'd perfer to think we were having a discussion.
But either way, good luck with your play. Hope it all goes well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|