|
|
|
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:47 am
I finally am getting to see Kiss of the Spider Woman which I've been wanting to see since it was new. Alas, I've never lived anywhere it was at the library. It's at my local. It's not easy watching, but I expected that. It makes me angry all over again that Raul Julia got so few good scripts and died such a stupid death due to negligence for yet another crap movie. (For younger readers, Raul Julia was a Puerto Rican actor who refused to play gang members. He was a forerunner for Antonio Banderas in American film. Before him, there wasn't much in the way of leading man roles for Latino men. As a result his career was stunted and he had to do a lot of crap to live on in between more dignified gigs in indie movies and such. The two things he's known for are KofS and those Addams Family movies.) the performances are excellent, of course. It is so odd to me that they keep calling the William hurt character variations on gay instead of treating the character as the transwoman she so obviously is. It's a reminder of how far we've come really, even as the plot and circumstances are so very relevant given the mess we continue to fund and instigate in south and Central America, as well as our own recent flirtation with fascism and torture. The ugliness and ambiguity of the choices and circumstance... yeah. Very very relevant.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:34 pm
Drugstore Cowboy I came across Drugstore Cowboy on TV today. Even better it was just before the section that's scratched on the library DvD so I could actually watch the stuff with William Burroughs in it properly. (Abe and I watched it together the first time when we were going through are post Naked Lunch beat phase, so i have a soft spot for it). Anyway, listening to Burroughs talk, I am always amazed by how well Peter Weller does him in Naked Lunch, catching the odd intonation and vocal mannerisms without turning it into parody. Anyway, I watched it with Trainspotting in my head, which I've watched a few times, most recently last week, pocking at the different ways the movies handled similar themes. Narrative voice is so important in both of them, the themes so similar, yet the effect is very different. There is a shot of Matt Dillon on a train, when he's going back to Portland where for a second he looked like Christian Bale. He turned, and his profile suddenly morphed into Robert Pattenson, complete with the famous hair and Edward Cullen emo sulk. Ah the recurrence of certain facial proportions in male leading men. I have nothing profound to say here.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 11:16 pm
Australia So I finally got around to watching Australia. I am neither a Bas Luhrman fan, nor big on Nichole Kidman. I don't mind either, but I've never seen anything of either of there's that was better than watchable, so i didn't bother seeing this in a theater. it was free at the library though, and I got it, mostly hoping for tanned, muscular, shirtless shots of Hugh Jackman. In this, it was not a disappointment. Otherwise, it was an extremely long, nay endless chick flick, with a lot of manipulative emotional stuff involving a child character. It also seemed to me that in a moving were racial attitudes signaled whether one was a good guy or a bad guy, the death toll was awfully high for the aboriginal characters, who except for the child, seemed little more than props for the white characters, two dimensional creatures there to show how broadminded the heroes are and to die at climactic moments to ratchet up the sense of jeopardy. It reminded me rather of Last of the Mohicans really. This is not a compliment. It's basically an insanely long Romance novel. Honestly African Queen did it rather better, and while Jackman is cuter than Bogart, Kidman is no Katherine Hepburn. I'm glad I did not pay money to see it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:05 am
Star Trek First off, I never thought I'd be drooling over Bones, but Dayumn! Sulu was poetry in motion. Also, Eric Bana is weirdly hot bald with tattoos. Who knew? I'm really not used to being catered to sexually in SF films, but between this and Wolverine, I'm definitely liking it. Performance wise, I was impressed that Kirk, Spock, and bones, read right without being exact copies or pastiche. That's very hard to do. Kirk was still obnoxious, but nowhere near as annoying as Shatner and I only found myself cheering for him to die once, which is a record for fewest times in any film with Kirk in it. With Spock, it was a reasonable interp even though I did periodically expect him to eat Kirk's brain and/or kiss him. I was a little weirded out by him being into earth women, but that was script, not acting, if that makes sense. Bones was perfect, catching exactly the right tone and feel without being annoying. I don't just say this because he's sexy, either. I didn't spot a wrong note. We didn't see enough of Sulu to see how he'll pan out, but I liked the contrast between star Fleet correct bridge officer and gleeful fencer which fits. Chekov was not what I expected, but I can live with it. Uhura was not as fleshed as I would have liked, given her screen time, but it was good to see them using her as a linguist and not just a glorified receptionist. Simon Pegg was some brilliant casting. Someone clearly had a flash of brilliance. I liked what little I saw of Pike and George Kirk. I know this is blasphemy, but Nimoy seemed tired and ill, and the Vulcans in general were unimpressive. Mini Spock rocked for a little kid though. Mini-Kirk, not so much. The plot though... ugh. I get why they did it, but even knowing that, I still had a hard time swallowing it. They tried to balance it by extreme fan service in dialog references. I know the others clapped and cheered by I felt manipulated and it broke suspension of disbelief after a little. I wouldn't have minded one or two or even three, but there were just too many catch phrases and references for a single movie. I know mini-skirts are canon, but watching the women trying not to show us everything on the bridge, I found them distracting and impractical. And then there were the plot holes, but this being star Trek, it's par for the course. The real problem for me was that I kept getting pulled out of the movie. I couldn't maintain suspension of disbelief for more than a scene or two at a time, and found myself watching the audience instead. It was beautiful and as I mentioned, most of the acting really worked, but the project was too self conscious just generally, and once I realized that they were throwing out Star Trek's history from before I was even born until now, I found that wildly distracting, my brain picking at it and picking at it. I know they do this all the time with superheroes, but I didn't grow up caring about superheroes, so I guess it doesn't hit me the same way. (Yes, I watched Adam west's bat man, and we loved the reeves Superman when it came out, but I was watching star trek every week from infancy with my dad and I still drool like Pavlov's dog when the end credit music from the original show plays because we always had Sunday dinner right after Trek ended. Yes, I grew up geek.) I know Wolverine's claws bug the ******** out of superhero fans, but my only exposure to X-men was the cartoon in the '90's and the movies. I simply don't have the knowledge to get worked up, if that makes sense. Again, I did have sporadic fun; I'll likely watch the next one. It's just this was flawed. It also weirdly, reminded me of how little I liked TNG initially. I actually missed the first 2 or 3 seasons as I had no television, and watched them later in syndication while we were watching the new ones. I got into it because Abe and the Corvallis guys watched it like a soap opera. Season three or four was interesting enough, but I hated half the characters, which didn't help, and the image I had of Tasha Yar in my head was significantly more interesting that the real Tasha when I saw her. In my opinion, TNG only became really good rather than watchable after Rodenberry died, and i generally prefer DS9 to any of the other franchises. I know, I know, more blasphemy. My problems with TNG were various. The Rodenberry era blandness wasn't a problem with the new film, but the shortage of strong/competent female leads that can stand with the men as both characters and characterizations is still a problem. (Tasha: uneven and weak. Beverly: bland. Improved over time, but essentially the nurturing mother stereotype. That Betazoid: Worse shrink ever. Week, glaringly incompetent, relies entirely on her weak empathy instead of having a knowledge of psychology nd how to actually help people. Wears special Starfleet push up bra. Need I go on?) Uhura's the only female lead in this film and while she could have been so much worse, she also could have been so much better. The other females in the film were barely characterized at all. It doesn't help that as an adult I'm very cynical about Federation Culture and star fleet in particular, for reasons to complex to explain here, but I kept getting rubbed authentically wrong, if that makes sense. I also have trouble believing in Kirk's competency, a problem I've had with classic Trek ever since I was old enough to question it at approximately puberty. I could believe in Picard as a new federation captain and Cisco as a throw back to oldstar fleet, with Janeway somewhere in between. Hell, I hated Enterprise, but the problem was not believing they'd put that captain in charge of a ship. I've never really believed a Star Fleet that stems from that culture would not haul Kirk away for therapy. It's too contradictory, if that makes sense. I think the fact I've been rereading Bujold doesn't help. Pike makes Kirk exec. They send Ensign Miles Vorkosigan to Kiril Island to see if he can work in a chain of command, and Barrayar is way more savage that the federation. I have an easier time buying Barrayar ultimately finding a use for a manic unorthodox genius like Miles, than I do believing JT Kirk wouldn't get forcibly sent for star fleet's version of Betan Therapy. I realize this is a personal problem, but it's a problem I've had with Star Trek since before Bujold even imagined Barrayar. I know, I know, it's a minority opinion. Let the flames begin. For plot holes: http://biomekanic.livejournal.com/466335.html?style=mine#cutid1
|
 |
 |
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:46 pm
Frida I finally got to see Frida which I missed in theaters. It's that rare movie that completely lives up to the hype and possibly surpasses it. Brilliant acting, a clever script that leaves in Frida's spirit and Diego's assholery, but manages to make him vulnerable and her complex, brilliant set design, costuming and cinematography that capture the art and the context, a deep sensuality, music perfect to the subject.... I could go on and on.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2009 11:41 pm
Public Enemies I couldn't sleep, so I saw Public Enemies. I think this is more evidence of Depp's complexity and skill as an actor. Dillenger really is hard, that mix of charisma, mischief, sensitivity, intelligence, and capacity for sudden brutal violence could have easily left a fragmented performance, but it didn't. Depp sold it to me, all the way through. The script design was well balanced, giving Purvis, the mafia, and nelson as contrasts. I loved how it captures that sense I always got living back east that police or mob, it's mostly a choice of gang colors a lot of the time. The FBI and the mafia being bookends squeezing out the independents was honestly perfect. Nelson's brutality and lack of care for civilians so like that of the FBI. There were scenes where I was wondering what happened to those innocent people who had been shown just before the violence erupted. Where they okay? I loved Dillenger's self awareness in the face of change.
The details of costuming, set dressing location, etc. really grabbed one. The use of period music really pulled one in. In the first bank scene, I shivered, remembering how cold marble banks and post offices used to be, back when they were civic temples, the chill sinking into the stone no matter what the weather was like. I can't remember when i was last in a bank like that. Odds are, it was 1983. The architecture drew me back east as well, into my childhood, there are so few buildings like that out here. The buttons on a dress, reminded me of my great aunts, the fabric of another of my grandmother. The station reminding me of childhood trips. It was little touches like the heights drawn on the jail wall, that pulled one into the time and place.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:33 am
I went to see Zombieland. Zombieland was everything I want in a zombie film except a little eye candy. It's very, very violent, so don't go if you aren't up for that. The music was right up my ally. They got Metallica to let them use a song. Dude! casting was excellent. This is clearly the role Woody haralson has been practicing for for years. The Michael Cera clone playing Columbus managed to be significantly less annoying than Mr. Cera himself would have been, and was a good foil for the stronger personalities around him. The young lady playing Wichita managed to sell the role despite looking disturbingly like a Bratz doll. I was pleased by the unsentimental approach to children, which so many other action/horrors fall into. It's a very different feel to Shaun of the Dead movie wise, but is a worthy addition to the humor/zombie subgenre, functioning successfully both as a zombie movie and a comedy.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:15 am
My local library turned out to unexpectedly have a copy of [rec], though not Quarantine. It turns out that except for the end, Quarantine was a fairly faithful adaptation. I do think [rec] is slightly better overall. I can see why they changed the end from the original one in [rec], but I think thy replaced one set of problems with slightly different ones. Ah well.
|
 |
 |
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artemesia_of_Persia Vice Captain
|
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2009 2:07 am
Paranormal Activity My feeling is, if a handful of people can make a watchable movie as a labor of love for aprox $1500.00, they've already won. my expectations were fairly low going in, but I'm all for people trying to make their own films and I'm rather old school in my tastes for horror films in that I'm way more interested in atmosphere than gore. Again, by this measure, they won, with some caveats.
1. Much of this film was shot (understandably) in queasy cam. Thus, if you get motion sick easily, pop some Dramamine or don't go. 2. It's a bit of a slow starter. I think it's worth it, but you might not. 3. I can't tell you if it's scary or not, as hardly anything scares me. It did seem to impress a number of other audience members significantly more than it did me, and there was a semi-hysterical woman a few rows back. It was atmospheric enough in the right places to keep my attention.
I do think that as a B movie, it was about as good as or slightly better than Drag me To Hell, which, given the relative effects budgets, is pretty damned impressive. It wasn't profound, but it worked quite well on it's own terms. I think it greatly benefited from the low budget as instead of relying on cheap gore and CGI, it relied on acting, suggestion, subtle effects, whoever was doing the sound effects, and the imagination of the audience. As a result, it was much more elegant than modern horror movies tend to be. It was pleasantly old school in conception despite the modern people filming events conceit. I think it also helped, that unlike Drag me to hell, they cleverly included one reasonably sympathetic main character instead of having everyone so despicable you wish they'd die already.
In summation, horror movie wise, it's no [rec]/Quarantine, but it is is pretty solidly entertaining if what you are looking for is a good, solid old school movie to watch leading up to Halloween.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|