Niran_Betta_Fish
Lord Setar
[gossamer]!smile. should be left out.
Him and I have some personal problems that go back a bit, and he's recently dredged up some s**t with me that's set my emotions off more than I like. Yes, I'm a bit of an apathetic drone in debate, but that's how I roll.
Not to mention, he's a slight bit of a moron. Openly posts something in the ED regarding transpeople without evidence, knows that he doesn't have evidence, and when he starts getting logically raped claims DA.
Also, good job barring Macai - I would have suggested that. I have this neat habit of refuting his premise, but he refuses to accept that his argument has a faulty premise so he starts off on his usual "REFUTE ME OR CONCEDE" crap when I've already refuted him by showing that his premise is faulty. His support means nothing if his premise is inherently faulty =/
Edit: Why is funliver missing from that list? Octane's also absent...
Him and I have some personal problems that go back a bit, and he's recently dredged up some s**t with me that's set my emotions off more than I like. Yes, I'm a bit of an apathetic drone in debate, but that's how I roll.
Not to mention, he's a slight bit of a moron. Openly posts something in the ED regarding transpeople without evidence, knows that he doesn't have evidence, and when he starts getting logically raped claims DA.
Also, good job barring Macai - I would have suggested that. I have this neat habit of refuting his premise, but he refuses to accept that his argument has a faulty premise so he starts off on his usual "REFUTE ME OR CONCEDE" crap when I've already refuted him by showing that his premise is faulty. His support means nothing if his premise is inherently faulty =/
Edit: Why is funliver missing from that list? Octane's also absent...
What's DA? I'm not always up on abbreviations.
Devil's Advocate, where you argue in support of a position that you may not actually support.
