|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 8:18 am
I read it a year or so ago, but I read Twilight right afterward, and it sort of muddied my memory of Blue Bloods (that happens a lot with me if I read books of similar genres one right after another. I try not to do that anymore). After I finish Breaking Dawn and a few others, I may go back and read Blue Bloods again and continue through the series.
Blue Bloods 3: Revelations is coming out just before Halloween this year, so it's a good time to get into the series!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 10:12 pm
I love this series! I'm so excited for the next book to come out. This vampire series may be better than Stephenie Meyer's. *hides from Twilight fans*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 12:38 pm
I might try it after the "Twilight" mania dies down, so I can see if it stands the test of time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 8:41 pm
Twilight is a good book but unlike twilight this one has more of a metropolitan feel and some would compare it to Vampire Academe but it almost like Gossip girl meet The Princess diary with a vampire Element to it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:15 pm
I read them, I'm waiting for The Van Alen Legacy to come out...
I guess you could say they're good...but there was no blood-sucking, no dark aspect to it at all...it kind of reminded me of a Meg Cabot book, just with vampires. No offense to you Meg Cabot fans, but I don't like her books, they seem to be all about some average kid finding out she has something to do with her life and becoming popular. That's basically what Blue Bloods was like, and I don't really like it. I prefer House of Night myself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 16, 2009 3:07 pm
I read Blue Bloods and I think it's better than Twilight... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:21 am
I'm not going to compare Twilight and Blue Bloods. I didn't like either.
Blue Bloods is too immersed in the trivialities of a popularity race in the high school scene filled in with pretty narrow-minded characters. It is nothing like any other vampire story I've ever read, which could have been good if it was written well, but when you hear the same things over and over again (unpopular, demure girl experiences life changing events that suddenly shunt her into the spotlight where everything becomes about her and her life alone), it gets boring. I guess some people like that sort of book, but it just feels like a broken record to me. I have the first and second books, and cannot get past chapter two in Masquerade. After all, if you're going to write a vampire novel, shouldn't there be some sort of blood-sucker type theme? The idea that vampires are reincarnated was a nice twist, but they're basically just really rich, really powerful humans who happen to need blood. What's the fun in that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
