National Socialism, the only correct form of Socialism. | Page 1 | Communist/Socialist (meeting place) | Guild Forums

Gaia Guilds

Politicians of Gaia

Back to Guilds

A place for debates of political/social values and ideas

Tags: Politics, debate, Conservtive, Liberal, Moderate

Communist/Socialist (meeting place)

National Socialism, the only correct form of Socialism.

k31owner

Offline

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:41 pm

I will not explain what it is, I will only answer questions you ask. To go into detail would take me hours to write and none of you would read it anyways. So go ahead, ask away.

*National Socialism is a right winged ideal and is not suited for those of the left winged nature. National Socialism is not responsible for lost or stolen items. Warranty void if seal broken.

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 1:21 am

I disagree with your statement that National Socialism is the only true form of socialism.

1. Focus on ethnicity
Previous incarnations of this ideology (like the Nazi party) were always too focused on ethnicity rather than national identity. Defining national identity in terms of ethnicity limits diversity and creates a stagnant population that lacks the vitality of change and new ideas. The UK and the US are both ethnically diverse yet have strong national identities. They are both rather successful countries.
A good example of how defining national identity according to ethnicity stagnates growth is how the Nazi party rejected finance capitalism because their antisemitic beliefs. I realize that the US is currently having problems because of bad credit practices, but the ability to get a loan is practically the basis of the strongest economies in the world and yet the Nazi party rejected this idea due to a historical association of Jews and moneylenders!

2. Rejection of liberalism
Liberalism is an important check against injustice. Tolerating and respecting the rights of people first, then perusing national agendas second keeps the government from ever turning on YOU. Otherism is a very easy way to gather the support of the majority, but demographics change and you never know when it will be convenient for those in power to consider YOU the other. Thus it is rational to have a system that goes out of its way to protect even the most negligible minority because only then can you be sure that YOU are protected.