|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:59 pm
GUMMIBEARFIZZ OVERALL SCORE: 118/120 Question ONEDid the person use one of the songs in their profile:
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7
Song is used for sure IE too 20/20 Question TwoIs it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
indeed so the use of typography, and simple colors is so easy on the eyes, it makes me want to stay for hours upon hours. A bit busy but the busy doesn't effect anything, I really like viewing this profile. 20/20
Question ThreeIs the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
no everything is perfectly perfect seriously 20/20 Question FourWas effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme? totally that's all I can say, it just screams effort, talent originality. 20/20
Question FiveIs the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]everything is easy to find, everything is easy to read, no harmful blaring text ect. wish the about section was bigger but meh 18/20 Question SixDoes the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
totally, personally I feel like I'm watching the story on the page, it's not so much the graphic that gets it, but the colors, the text, the placement, the jumbled up nature of things, it paints the picture vividly in my mind
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Love it, simple, nice on the eyes, easy design, I feel that gummi is quickly becoming a trend setter, sooner or later it will be her profiles that everyone will want, and her profiles that everyone will follow from, gummi shows outstanding ability to create what a user wants and make it look nice.
She has also shown herself able to move past brushes, and create a well rounded theme, multi-talent= greatness
FINAL SCORE 118/120
Question ONE
Did the person use one of the songs in their profile:
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7
Some choice lyrics were written into the design, and the song was availible to listen to in the profile
20/20
Question Two
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
The profile is very appealing with rustic colour scheme and textures. The images compliment the design well and are balanced neatly throughout the profile.
19/20
Question Three
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
No problems were found, coded or other
20/20
Question Four
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
It would appear that a lot of time and effort was put into making the profile, judging by the sheer amount of detail and design.
20/20
Question Five
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
A userbar is presemt, although some parts of the profile could be considered hard to read.
19/20
Question Six
Does the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
It fits in an interesting manner, the barren colour scheme and header image suits the country sound the surprisingly morbid lyrics of the song ._.
20/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Its an incredibly detailed profile. I think Gummi was the one who got into this round the most.
Final score 118/120
Question ONE
Did the person use one of the songs in their profile: yes
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7:9 yes
20/20
Question Two
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
very well done alot of work put into it. ide stay all day if i had the time
20/20
Question Three
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
nope.
20/20
Question Four
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
deffiantly alot alot of effort put into this
20/20
Question Five
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
very accesible easy to read,
20/20
Question Six
Does the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
i think it fits, i think it could use maybe a little more umph but it fits non the less.
19/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
great work alot of time and effort put into understanding the song and interpreting it. Out of the three deffiantly the best looking.
FINAL SCORE 119/120
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:11 pm
Gloss and Curls OVERALL SCORE= 95/120 Question ONEDid the person use one of the songs in their profile:
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7
yes most part yeah comment button doesn't appear in IE comments a little messed up 18/20 Question TwoIs it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
It somewhat is, I like the theme to it, however the gradients seem to be a bit much, everything is a gradient, and it kinda looks a little weird, specially because it's like collage+gradient. 16/20
Question ThreeIs the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
no flaws I can visually see, It seems a bit too far to the left 19/20 Question FourWas effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?It seems like effort was placed into it, however at the same time it seems like the kinda same ol' same ol' but that's just nit picking really. I think the typography had some major effort placed into, along with the concept 18/20
Question FiveIs the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]I can access everything rather well, nothing hard to read, ect. 20/20 Question SixDoes the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
I think it does to some degree.
The whole lover thing seems to fit rather well, the colors are somewhat fitting, however I think the profile would fit more so in an opera setting, not what this song was about.
16/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
for one I'm loving your advancement, nice to see the contest giving you new profile ideas, and new inspiration, keep on truckin.
FINAL SCORE 107/120
Question ONE
Did the person use one of the songs in their profile:
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7
No media player was present, although choice lyrics were used as section headers.
17/20
Question Two
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
The profile is nice, its colourful and uses innovative shapes and section heirarchy
18/20
Question Three
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
No problem with the profile, doding or other.
20/20
Question Four
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
The profile itself looks nice and effort clearly has been put into it, some research had also been done on the Gloss' end for interpretation which shows extended effort
19/20
Question Five
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
The gradients cause more focus to be rquired on certain parts of text, but it isnt much of a problem. A userbar is present although it took me a few to find it xD
18/20
Question Six
Does the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
I found the matching lyrics to section titles to be a good idea, and the quill was also an interesting interpretation. but I think the profile was a little bright and smooth to match the mood.
17/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
The profile is nice and the style what I'd expect from Gloss, I think a dryer colour than green would have benefitted her, as well as a more solid use of colour than gradients
Final Score 109/120
Question ONE
Did the person use one of the songs in their profile: yes
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7:9 only the status bar and a portion of an image were messed up.
19/20
Question Two
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
The colors are nice and soothing, but the use of so many drop shadows and gradients make parts of the profile an eyesore.
you dont want to be staring at it to long. the pictures on the side look misplaced and add a bit of realistic look to the
profile that shouldn't be there.
10/20
Question Three
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
nope.
20/20
Question Four
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
it looks more like it was slapped together in a day or so. parts of it are well done, but the comments and about and details in the
lower right look out of place with the gradients. It doesn't look like to much time was taken.
10/20
Question Five
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
yes and no. although all the necessary links are there and it is readable finding the links are hard, the comments is the
strand of words to the left of it and the 3 pictures status bar, on first glance without inspection there hard to find.
10/20
Question Six
Does the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
I think it misses the whole country feel to the song and replaces it with a more soothing feel. It doesn't really give off a
folkish song and the colors dont really emphsize love or a history/story. or any type of struggle.
5/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
The profile is good but looks to rushed, the background could have used some work, something besides a plain color, and if a plain
color not that one. The about and comments and details didn't need the gradients and they weren't well placed, along with the
header of the about, its not even legiable and the drop shadow in the leaf looks stupid simply put.
the three pictures on the side shouldn't be there they look randomly placed at the last minute.
FINAL SCORE 71/120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 25, 2008 10:27 pm
RADIOFREAKINCARBON OVERALL SCORE 103/120 Question ONEDid the person use one of the songs in their profile:
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7
for their profile yes, in the profile no >:[ no rounded corners in IE, and a bit of a mess up on the comments section 17/20 Question TwoIs it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
It's simple, and I love the simple aspect of it, frankly the colors are nice, centered around one main color, red, and I think red suits this profile rather well. The Flower is well made, and it's a v2 profile for one thing, which is extra props for using some originality. content+simple=good 18/20
Question ThreeIs the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
besides the IE nothing else really stands out as flawed 19/20 Question FourWas effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?Personally some might say v2=little effort, I find it means more, it's harder to achieve results from some v2 profiles, the flower itself shows effort, the attention to small detail, and the fitting of the theme all show work to me. 19/20
Question FiveIs the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]accessing everything with ease, cept a little different on IE, not too bad User bar is very nifty, userbars are generally pains for v2 profiles. 20/20 Question SixDoes the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
I think it fits the theme ok, not great, but well enough, flowers= I've got a feeling, I would have loved to see some more color, and a bit more vibrant, summer time comes to mind, but overall I find the theme well suited.
It's weird while playing the song, the profile seems to brighten up, strange feeling but I like it.
18/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
Keep up the great work
don't slack as much next time >:[
FINAL SCORE 111/120
Question ONE
Did the person use one of the songs in their profile:
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7
Well a playable media of the song itself wasnt in in the profile, but the lyrics were worked into the design in a very innovative way.
18/20
Question Two
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
The all red of the profile is easy on the eyes, with the tones of each part bold enough to make everything distinguishable. The profile overall is simplistic, but not boring.
18/20
Question Three
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
The profile is almost perfect, however when I click the question mark button on friends or commenters their box appears far below the content and the content itself halves and gets a scrollbar. Its pretty weird
18/20
Question Four
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
Comparing it to her previous entries I'd say this profile was less inspired. None the less there are signs of effort. The flower and lyrics were done by hand and the colour scheme and section positioning were carefully chosen for size and look.
17/20
Question Five
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
A userbar is availible and all the content and even the design itself is clear and easy to read
20/20
Question Six
Does the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
It doesnt do to bad at fitting the mood of the song, however a softer song would have better suited the subtlety of the profile.
18/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
I was expecting a little more from Radio but its still a nice profile. I think it'd make a good freebie
Final score 109/120
Question ONE
Did the person use one of the songs in their profile: yessum 10
Did the Person make the profile compatible in IE7:9 everything but the patch which shows up as a giraffe in ie
19/20
Question Two
Is it visually appealing? On first glance what do
you want to keep visiting, or does it strike you
as simply boring.
Althought the header is very nicely done the color scheme is very monocromatic (one color....) the dark reds and the very dull
colors don't make you want to visit it much, it has a sort of calming effect but not something you would come back to over and over
again.
12/20
Question Three
Is the profile flawed? what are the problems with
the profile, , miss-coded
sections.
nope.
20/20
Question Four
Was effort put into it? Does it look as if the
person placed time and strain on their work?
Or did they slap it together to fit the theme?
effort was deffiantly put into this, the flower in the corner alone can show that. Although i dont think enough effort was put
into interperating the song, rather interperting a song lyric from it. More like she tryed to digitalize the deep inside lyric
by using deep dark colors rather then the whole song itself.
15/20
Question Five
Is the content accessible? is a userbar present,
about section easily readable, can you leave a comment
ect. [note this does not have to be details, journal ect.]
very accesible easy to read,
20/20
Question Six
Does the profile fit the mood/theme of the song, does the profile
seem to tell the story of the song, or have the same mood as the song.
Although i think they tried to fit the mood i think they missed what the song mood is. The deep dark colors dont match well
with the song, the flower tries to fit a hippy/flower child refrence more as a last ditch effort to tie something into the song.
Personally the song is so uplifiting the profile has an almost ironic feel to it instead of portraying breaking free and letting
loose like the song should it has a more constrictive feel. the header gives off more of a grungey emoey depressing feel to it
rather then a smooth "hippy" feel like it should.
5/20
Final Comments
What are your final comments on this profile, sum up your thoughts here please.
although alot of time and effort seems to be put in this profile i think it misses the whole purpose of the song, the whole
"break free" feel that the song has. When you listen to the song as your viewing it the only thing that you really tie to
the song is the flower and the header. I wish this would have more peacefull colors rather then a soothing color. A brighter
look could have turned this whole profile around, The use of monochromatic didn't really seem to fit this song which in itself
is so filled with different feelings you can't possibly express it with just one shade of color.
FINAL SCORE 91/120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
