|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:56 pm
What was Erika-chan trying to say to yuki? ( do you know yuki is a guy's name....yuuki is the girls form XD)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2005 11:05 pm
well, so far, I guess she's saying as a star, growing up around somebody made to be so perfect is a harsh comparison t have to live up to, and likely to make her feel inferior in comparison. Her parents didn't want her to grow up feeling worthless because she wasn't like these famous seiyus (spelling?), so they kept her away from them, however, Erika herself fell victom to the inferiority and sadness of comparison to her peers, and still managed to negatively affect yuki's life since she's standing between her and piro or something like that, plus now that she knows who she is, she sees that whole mess about her being famous.
(I thought yuki was a guy's name! there was a guy named yuki in gravitation and I was like "how is yuki a girl? is the name like taylor here, for both?)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2005 7:48 pm
still confused....(its Yuuki)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:21 pm
Holy crap, B to tha Cherry, that was one really long sentence! @_@
Erika was trying to say that she was famous because...because, so everyone thought she was this really spectacular lady. In truth, however, she didn't think she was that great, and she told Yuuki that she's a very strong, talented girl, and she shouldn't feel inferior to Erika just because the latter's famous. Get it now? sweatdrop
PS: Sorry I haven't been here lately, a lot has changed on the forum! My dad and I moved, and I had PSAT today, soooo...yeah.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:23 pm
StuffGal Holy crap, B to tha Cherry, that was one really long sentence! @_@ sweatdrop yeah, I'm very.....long winded, wordy........sorry 'bout that. oh, PSAT? I found them pointless, did not pass go, did not collect 200 dollars and went straight to the regular SAT.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:51 pm
bluecherry StuffGal Holy crap, B to tha Cherry, that was one really long sentence! @_@ sweatdrop yeah, I'm very.....long winded, wordy........sorry 'bout that. oh, PSAT? I found them pointless, did not pass go, did not collect 200 dollars and went straight to the regular SAT. yea...i have to take the SAT in about a month....looking forward to that stare ....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 1:48 pm
oooooooh, good luck with that. Man, if I had taken the SATs just a little sooner, I wouldn't have had to do the new extra section, but I was "lucky enough" to take the first time they gave out the new section rolleyes Since they needed "at least a years worth of data to compare" I still don't know how I did on that exactly (because the numbers mean nothing to me, the percentages I can compare to F-A grading)
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:01 pm
bluecherry oooooooh, good luck with that. Man, if I had taken the SATs just a little sooner, I wouldn't have had to do the new extra section, but I was "lucky enough" to take the first time they gave out the new section rolleyes Since they needed "at least a years worth of data to compare" I still don't know how I did on that exactly (because the numbers mean nothing to me, the percentages I can compare to F-A grading) youll probably never know....damn secretive ppl....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 8:19 pm
indeed ninja I'm sure some of them are those evil belgian spies. Sure, they make great waffles and chocolate, but they have some truely 3|/!1 1337 spies.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 12:22 pm
Ohhhh, sheiss, you're right, they have the new NEW section now! crying
I took the PSATs to see what the SAT would be like, aaand... if they do reveal anything about it, then... I'm screwed v_v My little brain just isn't fast enough to process all that information in time! I'ma take the SAT sometime next semester...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:15 pm
yesh, thats what sucks. Its not really something that would be all of too bad if it wasn't for not having enough time. crying
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:31 pm
time....always too much but never enough....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:06 pm
The real problem of time (among other things) is the poor distribution of it. There's never the right amount going to the right area.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:53 pm
bluecherry The real problem of time (among other things) is the poor distribution of it. There's never the right amount going to the right area. exactly....
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|