|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 10:51 am
My idea of "big" for the big girls is bigger than most people in this guild. Based on the pictures I've seen none of the girls here I would consider big by any means. Just healthy, or average. Big, in my mind at least, is the 300+ lbs. range. If there are any women here who fall into that catagory and are shy, please don't be!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:46 pm
Hmm, sorry i am only 2.2/3 of the girl for you. i haven't seen any girls fitting that in the guild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:10 pm
I know girls that size, not on Gaia, though... I can't think of one person I know on Gaia that size, although I guess I just haven't run into them.
...But if you're an FA, you have to recognize your perception of fat is majorly skewed.
One of my biggest pet peeves is when people, especially guys, tell girls they aren't "fat enough" to be considered fat when everybody else is telling them "You're too fat, get away." I ran across that when I first found the FA community and was told I was "too skinny" by some jealous b***h who didn't like that I was younger, cuter and prettier and smaller than her. I was told it by a few guys, too, I felt horrible 'til I realized they were more into the fat than what the person actually looked like... I guess that's when my ego was born.
I can point out many girls my size that aren't healthy, and that's since I've lost weight. I've seen two girls here I'd consider average, but they're actual FAs as far as I recall. Then three girls I'd consider "chubby". The rest I can't group, just like I can't decide if I'm chubby, thick or just fat. I get told I'm not "fat", because of my build, but I don't think I'm small enough to be "chubby". The world may never know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:53 pm
Nowhere man, that's probably because "big" is an extremely vague and subjective word.
Srsly.
I think the issue of "how fat is fat" has been covered pretty well by Ghosty. I'd like to elaborate, however, on some limitations of the english langauge.
Let's say you hear the phrase "big girl". Out of context, what does that mean?
It could mean a female over 300 pounds, although even that's sketchy. Somebody who looks 300 pounds to you may be 200 pounds, fine-boned, and short, or actually 400 pounds but tall and muscular under their fat.
A big girl could equally be a buxom female, a woman who is large in the chesticles area, regardless of how small she is everywhere else.
Big girls can be tall, musuclar, or just big-boned.
Big girls can also be just females too old to be considered "little girls", the sort of big girls that do not cry-y-y-y.
Also, this forum is not a dating site, and there's no reason why people posting here should conform to your standards.
I mean, it's not like "big girl" is even in the title. It's soft and sexy. I've no doubt that, even if they are under 300 pounds, most of the pictures posted here include a reasonable degree of softness, and you can find at least one other person on the forums who would agree that they are sexy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 8:37 pm
I concur with Fuzzy. Its is vague and subjective term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 9:04 pm
"Big" is fairly vague, but I think TNWM has a point. Most girls who consider themselves "large," "big," or "fat" are really just average sized girls influenced by a super thin society.
That's why they call them "average" in the first place.
It really pisses me off when average people call themselves "fat" or "big" when they have no idea what being above average is truly like. I weighed 296 in high school, so I know what comes with the territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:29 am
Some girls who call themselves large are like me or my friend, we are big boned, muscular, thick. We will always be some form of big, even if I lost all the weight I wanted to, I'm going to be big, I will never be dainty and "cute" (which if we're arguing subjective terms, cute is a great one to go off on).
However, if I lost all the weight I wanted to, at most I'd call myself chubby, because I think if I ever get to just chubby I will be happy with myself and not want to lose to where I can't even call myself that.
But even "average" is subjective--if you look through average ranges from fairly thin to fairly chubby.
He's not talking about most girls, as far as I can gather--he's talking about the girls in the guild. Like Fuzzy said, this guild is "soft and sexy" it doesn't even claim you have to be big, just soft.
But as I said before, two of them I've ever seen (one never comes here anymore) I'd describe as "average", and they are really FAs, they don't claim to be big. Three are chubby, although maybe they're just lucky that their weight is in all the "right" places. I had a friend who weighed as much if not more than me, who was an hourglass figure so she could wear bikinis while I had to wear one-pieces. She was still fat, just her weight was distributed to where it was more flattering on her than mine was on me. I was probably 216-230 at the time, that is big enough. Now that I've lost down to 220 I'm like "God, was I that big?" and my boobs have gotten bigger, I've filled out more, and my bones have filled out more--so in high school I really must've been fat.
The rest of the girls here I would lump in with me, maybe one or two I would say are about to fall under his definition of "big". But I think most of us are big enough to where we can't claim we're just "chubby". I don't consider myself chubby, I consider myself fat if anything. But I know I'm so muscular and big boned, I'm really not as fat as many other girls my weight, and I'm not so fat that I can't live my life normally.... But still, the best description of me would be "fat". Just because my size isn't "big enough" for somebody's sexual ideals, it doesn't take away from the fact that I'm fat. I still got made fun of all through elementary and much of middle school, I had issues with my family doing all the wrong things to get me to try to lose weight, I have been taught and made to feel miserable my entire life because to "average" people I am too big, I am fat. So just because he prefers super-big girls at 300+lbs, that doesn't mean I'm not fat...
I'm sorry, no way in hell am I taking all those horrible memories without at least being allowed the title of "fat girl".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 3:23 pm
I consider myself chubby. But it's all about how you define yourself. Words like "chubby" and "fat" and "big" are designed to be ambiguous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:22 pm
gaah this was taken completely out of context. I was meerly making an observation and I am an FA I know this but not all FAs are feeders >_>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:27 pm
Um, what does the fact that not all FAs are feeders have to do with the topic? x.x
*I are not unner-standing*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 10:27 pm
Wow when did the topic of feeding come up. If it makes you feel better, i am not a feedee (thats the word right).
Umm, so what was the original meaning of the post, if you feel it was out of context or are you just sad that no "big" girls have shown up for you.
xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:13 am
Yeah, I don't really know where feeding came into the equation on this.
The message I got was:
"I don't consider girls under 300lbs "big". Most of the girls in this guild I would not consider big. If you are about 300lbs, talk to me."
In order to be "big" one has to be either built thick, or heavyset, in general. Other than the whole "big girls don't cry" thing, just talking about being an adult.
So in response to your saying less than 300lbs you don't consider big, I whole-heartedly disagree. I recognize you're an FA and if that's what you PREFER that's your business, but that doesn't mean I'm not big or fat. And I hate when FAs tell me or any other big girl, who might possibly just be starting to gain confidence, that they're not "big enough" to be big, just like normal people have told me "You're too fat" every day of my life. And at 220 on a thick-boned, muscular, 5'7" frame, I know I wouldn't fall into the category of "big" you described.
And nowhere in there did "feederism" come into play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 12, 2008 9:45 am
Well then I guess I'm not fat. xD;; I guess if I had to describe myself, it would be under 'chubby' or ...Well just chubby. x3
I dunno, I have a friend, Charity, she's REALLY big [in the adorable way! whee ] and she is only 280lbs. But by most standards, she is a BIG girl. <.< So I would also have to disagree. Just because you aren't over 300lbs, doesn't mean you aren't a big girl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:17 am
Woah! Nowhere Man...I'm sorry that there was a misunderstanding there. But I know what you mean. But it is all a matter of perception and who you are surrounded by. All my life, since I was little most of the people, men and women were 200+ lbs. All of the people in my family were fat....those that weren't...were the teased ones, kinda the polar opposite of what the 'typical' weight situation was. My uncle, one of the only male figures in my life for my formative years, was 600~lbs. I am just used to that sort of thing...so most people who are under 200lbs and of average height complaining that they are overweight kinda makes me think that they aren't really. But again...that is because of my perception...a skewed one I think. Heh...
And to answer your question at first post. :s I'm 300+ probably around 400. I don't even know anymore. Heh... sweatdrop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
