|
|
Is it Acceptable?! D: |
DEATH TO THE GIRL! |
|
54% |
[ 6 ] |
Eh, To each his/her own I Guess. |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
Yay :D |
|
27% |
[ 3 ] |
Marry Me? >:O |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
|
Total Votes : 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:04 pm
HERE IT IS! My paper of "Being a Lolita"
Please, tell me, did I do us justice? I may have it wrong, but I tried my hardest sweatdrop I got an 81/80!! I tried to do MY VIEW, since i realized, upon reading your words, that lolita means alot of different things to different people, so I tried to simplify it
Mr. M. Williams AP English 19 March 2008
'On Being a Lolita'
Webster’s English Definition of a ‘Lolita’ is “sexually precocious young girl”. But it’s actually far from that. A Lolita, in the fashion world and sense of the word, is a very prim, proper, and typically egotistical person. The style is a combination of the Rococo style’s elegant designs and architecture made famous through the infamous Marie Antoinette of France, and the children’s clothing from the Victorian Age. But, a Lolita is a Girl, or Boy, that is justly labeled Sweet and Innocent because of their outward appearance. We want to be a physical manifestation of innocence, purity, uprightness, and perfection, and that’s just how we act. A Lolita is just what the world makes it out to be.
I first found out about Lolita when a girl was complaining that a roleplaying site did not offer Lolita clothes for her avatar. The first thing to catch my eye was a picture of a boy in black capri-type pants with suspenders, a white lace shirt, small top hat, stockings, and a large platform shoes. A girl adjacent to him was in a gorgeous black dress with lace and bows in platform ‘Mary Janes’. I know that every one who falls in love with Lolita must have had the same thought when seeing their first picture: “Beautiful!” And it is just that. The first thought is that everything is beautiful, elegant, cute, and pretty much what every girl and some boys want to be. From that day on I carried around Pictures and listened to music with guitarists who wore Lolita. But being a fan means nothing. A Lolita, in their simplest form, is a person in a dress that meet three requirements; It must have a Bell Shape, Must be knee Length and no higher, and Must be of a simple pattern or color. That’s all it means to most. But to be a Lolita, not just a mannequin, the wearer has to be an over all good person. It’s really just a simple concept. Look the part, act the part. If you are dressed like an angel, you better act like one. To most people who wear Lolita, and therefor consider themselves Lolita, image is everything. Everyone has a different view, it is “ a personal style”, “ a way of life”, “a statement”, “It's the attitude which qualifies a Lolita.” I’ve been lucky enough to be in an environment with other Lolita, which some people never have the chance to, and most people try to exude a quiet, sweet dominance. It’s rude to make yourself stand out above your peer, but you want to be seen. A Lolita wants to be noticed and respected. I’ve spoken with numerous girls who all confess that Lolita is their niche. Some feel they have been going their whole life “searching for a "clique" or something in which [They] fit.” (Interview) Upon finding this subculture they can feel they belong and fit in, have a group, while still standing out and being noticed like most outsiders want. To the faithful, it is much more than a style. It is a sisterhood, where in we all seek each other out for comfort and common bonds. It is a career, fueling a passion and talent for sewing and design. It is an idea, started with some bows and lace on an expensive dress, transforming into a lifestyle and ideology of being something beautiful and elegant. To Lolita, it is a way of life. We gather and talk about the compliments we get, discuss the mean looks and laughs and jeers we endure, we sit around and eat pretty food on pretty plates in pretty clothes and forget everything. We live a fantasy, and force it to work even when it seems impossible.
To the World, we are kids with high allowances, or patience for sewing, who line the streets in busy sections of cities. We have our picture taken on a regular basis by strangers and major magazines, by people fascinated and intrigued. By people admiring and mocking us. Some people look at Lolita and see people afraid to grow up. We are often times labeled as having “peter pan syndrome”, which is just as it sounds. But in all honesty, age rarely crosses our minds.
“I think everyone should at least stop doing it at a certain age, because it simply looks bad on a lot of older people, and the whole focus of it is on being youthful. Not that I think people have to stop loving it just because their older, they should just stop trying to look like a little girl.” (Interview) You can scour forums and blogs and never see the word “age”, “young”, or even the mention of time itself, unless of course we are talking about how long shipping will take. To some people we are in denial that we have to grow up, and we are just protecting ourselves from the real world by closing our eyes and sipping tea and pretending it’s the 19th century again. It’s simply not the case. We do find escape from the hardships of life, but we don’t hide from it. Some people do drugs, some throw themselves into their work, and still some people find other distractions. Us Lolita have our clothes and our image to keep us busy. We hear things from people that we are trying to attract ***** or are perverts. Another falsehood. Most Lolita do not kiss in public, let alone sell themselves like some other people. Yet, we can be called this and we typically take it with a grain of salt. A true Lolita doesn’t fight.
And, of course, we are judged by our leaders. Lolita, like all groups, have leaders. Our God and our spokesperson, is Mana. One word. Mana is what the world thinks of when they think of Lolita. Mana became famous when he was the guitarist in a band that revolutionized a new genre of bands and Music called ‘Visual Kei’. Mana is a man. He is the one who started the movement and he is one of the owners of the major Lolita labels. He even started a magazine that is now considered the Lolita's “Bible”. Most people do not even know he is man. Outsiders who come to look at Lolita and hear about him, get scared and leave. But he isn’t the only role model for us. There is Kana, the girl who made being the “baby” a cute thing. She appears in magazines, Television shows, music videos, and on stage and speaks with a voice so high pitched and so similar to a child no older than three, that most people can not listen to her speak for more then the length of a common interview. These two people basically decide what the world thinks of us, but we can be judged by what we allow represent us, and we take pride in each other.
And thus, we are what they are. Lolita are these cute people in cute clothes saying cute things. The World looks at us and sees children playing dress up, adults hiding from age, and people afraid of being “normal”. Either way, A true Lolita will always deny all these things and go with the most virtuous of answers and play her part. Lolita are actresses and heroines. We are ideas. Being a Lolita is an experiment in social acceptance. Being an outsider while belonging to something. Being a contradiction and acting naive to the whole affair. A Lolita is just a human wrapped in so much lace you can barely tell they are human anymore. Just the way we Lolita like it. We are, as defined by the Lolita and Gothic Bible, “cute girls and boys who belongs to one of the many Lolita styles and ideologies.”
sweatdrop sweatdrop
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:25 pm
+_+
I'm sorry, but I suggest doing a little more research and more talking to experienced lolitas. Remember, Lolita Fashion in Japan is far different than the aspect in Western countries. A majority of us do not have wealthy or willing parents that gives us money to afford the clothes. I don't think there are many lolitas that follow the lifestyle either (it's mainstream society after all), at least I've never felt that way. But yes, I do like the idea that lolitas wear the clothes as a form of comfort (in this or our own world) because it's not as harmful as alternatives (drugs, cutting, etc.). And I'm sure every follower of lolita fashion feels that way. Plus, it's fun. Not everyone is prim and proper (heck, I'm in the track and field team. There's no time to be prim and proper if you've got a mile sprint to do). It's more like, "I can be myself" just as you described in the essay.
Also, not everyone thinks of Mana when it comes to Lolita. In all honesty, I really dislike him as a fashion icon. Nana Kitade would be my loli icon. The long time lolitas would probably think of Novala Takemoto, a large promoter of the fashion and lifestyle (he's crazy, but we love him). Oh and Kana mostly models for ero-loli style (sometimes cosplay coordinates).
Well, saying that a lolita doesn't fight, I might as well not be a lolita then (actually, I stick to the ideas of pacifism myself, but it makes me feel a little lazy in character. Still, there may be a lot more girls who don't defend themselves at all).
I don't think Lolita Fashion has a leader. We're pretty much independent even if we are fans of models, artists, and egl members who wear the fashion.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:49 pm
-C'est la lune qui conduit la danse...-
I'll keep my cc very brief.
1- Lack of a good introduction towards the fashion, you don't even point out where it rose up at, it's origins, so on and so forth. 2- Misleading information- it's quite obvious that the "facts" in your essay are biased views, and instead of concentrating on what Lolita is, which is a fashion, you go into the "Victorian lifestyle" mode. 3- Do want to see said "interviews", and either way they coin into the misleading view of Lolita. 4- Too many POVs; you mingle and switch between 3rd, 2nd, and 1st person.
You should've done much more research, and put everyone's views into it rather than those who think of Lolita as a "prim and proper lifestyle". Because it is not a "lifestyle" before it is a fashion. The whole "allowance" thing should not have been said, speaking that MAJORITY of Lolita ARE adults or teenagers who do work for their own things, not relying on money their parents give them. And I agree with the rest of Jolie's comment. Calling Mana "God" because his farts certainly do not smell like roses to most who are into Lolita. He is not the epitome of Lolita, nor did he make a Book of Testament for us to review and follow.
I'm not even sure if it was meant to be a personal view report or an essay, but either way its extremely wrong. If your teacher really wanted to look up this fashion, she would be mislead by what you presented. If Lolita was to be graded by the majority of the online lolita community like a History paper graded by a teacher, it would be pointed out multiple times that it lacks an abundant amount of information. Yes, it is your view, but all you are showing is "your view" and you're not supplying information that is worthwhile.
-...quand le soleil sera couché dans ton âme froide.-
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:14 am
Well I can most certainly tell that this paper was done from your point of view seeing that there seems to a be a lot of biased points and misinformed parts. I toke AP English and AP Literature in high school and I am highly surprised this paper would receive such a marking since as Amani said had, it had lots of technical issues such as the constant switching of point of views. I can give CC on this seeing that I had done a paper for on Lolita in AP and then again in College but based more around the contrasting views from the lifestyle Lolitas and the ones who loved the fashion for the clothes since that's a topic that covers a broader range of people involved in the fashion in was more accurate and more factual/testimonial based. I can say that: 1) You did not clarify that actual origins of Lolita but rather referred to the parts which would support your view of the lifestyle and actions that one should perform based from certain periods mentioned. 2) You focused on only one figure in the Lolita world failing to mention other well-respected people ranging for the literally works of Novala (which would have been more suitable for a AP English class to mention some in the literature field), Kana, Nana Kitade, or designers from other brands such as Isobe. I think focusing on Mana and referencing to him in a god-like manner was actually something a bit tastless and shouldn't have been used on this paper. 3) As Amani stated I would like to see whose testimonials you actually used because if you indeed did poll people than you would have received many responses that you could have used a balancers in your paper rather than just using the ones that justified your view. If that was going to be your goal than you should have said "Please only those who agree with me that being a Lolita is being a PERFECT young lady may reply". 4) You expanded greatly on the your view of the Western style of Lolita but did not touch basis on the Japanese part where it truly originated from making it seem like it was purely more Victorian/Rococo views as a medium to fortify mannerisms. 5) I hate to break this to you but as Amani said most people in this fashion are ADULTS. Teenagers just aren't financially stable enough to be able to support such an expensive hobby and I know too many few parents that are willing to help their kids develop either
There was overall a lot of flaws in your paper which shows your lack of research, true understanding of the many parts of Lolita, and your preference for being biased rather than being general in order to represent the variation of the Lolita community.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 4:26 pm
I would like to add that when writing a paper, you should follow an outline or have some sort of plan. I'm very sure your English teacher would have provided that (this will be very important when/if you take SAT tests and for other future school papers). As Amani and Kana explained , not everyone knows what lolita fashion is (especially in this part of the world!). On future papers (and speeches), state your thesis, have examples to back up your ideas (body points), and a conclusion that backs up the entire idea of the paper.
I'm guessing this was an informative paper, but as the other two said, it seemed more based on opinion. For future references, have sources.
*hustlepointoAmberforManapootingroses*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:24 pm
-Lolita_Kana- Well I can most certainly tell that this paper was done from your point of view seeing that there seems to a be a lot of biased points and misinformed parts. I toke AP English and AP Literature in high school and I am highly surprised this paper would receive such a marking since as Amani said had, it had lots of technical issues such as the constant switching of point of views. I can give CC on this seeing that I had done a paper for on Lolita in AP and then again in College but based more around the contrasting views from the lifestyle Lolitas and the ones who loved the fashion for the clothes since that's a topic that covers a broader range of people involved in the fashion in was more accurate and more factual/testimonial based. I can say that: 1) You did not clarify that actual origins of Lolita but rather referred to the parts which would support your view of the lifestyle and actions that one should perform based from certain periods mentioned. 2) You focused on only one figure in the Lolita world failing to mention other well-respected people ranging for the literally works of Novala (which would have been more suitable for a AP English class to mention some in the literature field), Kana, Nana Kitade, or designers from other brands such as Isobe. I think focusing on Mana and referencing to him in a god-like manner was actually something a bit tastless and shouldn't have been used on this paper. 3) As Amani stated I would like to see whose testimonials you actually used because if you indeed did poll people than you would have received many responses that you could have used a balancers in your paper rather than just using the ones that justified your view. If that was going to be your goal than you should have said "Please only those who agree with me that being a Lolita is being a PERFECT young lady may reply". 4) You expanded greatly on the your view of the Western style of Lolita but did not touch basis on the Japanese part where it truly originated from making it seem like it was purely more Victorian/Rococo views as a medium to fortify mannerisms. 5) I hate to break this to you but as Amani said most people in this fashion are ADULTS. Teenagers just aren't financially stable enough to be able to support such an expensive hobby and I know too many few parents that are willing to help their kids develop either There was overall a lot of flaws in your paper which shows your lack of research, true understanding of the many parts of Lolita, and your preference for being biased rather than being general in order to represent the variation of the Lolita community. ya, it was supposed to be what it is TO YOU, but I wanted to show it varies, and I did mention that its not everyones view. And The Basis of Lolita IS Rococo, but became popular Japan. and I am able to support my hobby and I'm only 16. I have a good paying job. I mentioned Kana, and I just said the ones that seemed to be recognized the easiest by people.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:27 pm
Jolie Rini I would like to add that when writing a paper, you should follow an outline or have some sort of plan. I'm very sure your English teacher would have provided that (this will be very important when/if you take SAT tests and for other future school papers). As Amani and Kana explained , not everyone knows what lolita fashion is (especially in this part of the world!). On future papers (and speeches), state your thesis, have examples to back up your ideas (body points), and a conclusion that backs up the entire idea of the paper.
I'm guessing this was an informative paper, but as the other two said, it seemed more based on opinion. For future references, have sources.
*hustlepointoAmberforManapootingroses* It was supposed to be YOUR point of view. And I didn't have an outline, and on the first paper I did, he said I used too much jargon and that I didn't make it personal. And my idea of the essay was that it can't really be defined as it is here, which is why I used the WEBSTER then the GLB def.s in the beginning then end, to show contrast.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:35 pm
OKAY, let me CLARIFY
The POINT of the paper was NOT to define something broadly, but to take a BROAD TERM that can be taken many ways, and show what it means to you and how it applies to you.
I did NOT tell about other famous Lolitas because I chose the two most recognized people.
"experienced lolitas" I really wish I had the rough draft of that essay, so I can explain my frustration with that. lol
And when I said PRIM AND PROPER, i mean I do not know ONE LOLITA who would say IT IS AT ALL ACCEPTABLE to do certain things in lolita.
And Please let me repeat this
IT WAS A P.O.V. PAPER. Like "On Being a Cripple", a rather popular essay we had to read. It's about taking something people look at and have a SET definition for and showing YOUR DEFINITION and shedding a different light
it was MEANT for the students in my class, who always think I'm in Drama going to do a part in a play when I dress up in Lolita for school. Please, keep that in mind. It is suppose to be biased. Research was done so that you could say "ITS THIS TO SOME PEOPLE, BUT TO ME IT IS ______" which is what I did
TO ME, it is a lifestyle. TO MOST PEOPLE I INTERVIEWED, it wasn't. But to a few, it was. It wasn't meant to say everything about Lolita. I don't think I, or anyone, could EFFECTIVELY right a paper like that.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:38 pm
Amanikitty -C'est la lune qui conduit la danse...-
I'll keep my cc very brief.
1- Lack of a good introduction towards the fashion, you don't even point out where it rose up at, it's origins, so on and so forth. 2- Misleading information- it's quite obvious that the "facts" in your essay are biased views, and instead of concentrating on what Lolita is, which is a fashion, you go into the "Victorian lifestyle" mode. 3- Do want to see said "interviews", and either way they coin into the misleading view of Lolita. 4- Too many POVs; you mingle and switch between 3rd, 2nd, and 1st person.
You should've done much more research, and put everyone's views into it rather than those who think of Lolita as a "prim and proper lifestyle". Because it is not a "lifestyle" before it is a fashion. The whole "allowance" thing should not have been said, speaking that MAJORITY of Lolita ARE adults or teenagers who do work for their own things, not relying on money their parents give them. And I agree with the rest of Jolie's comment. Calling Mana "God" because his farts certainly do not smell like roses to most who are into Lolita. He is not the epitome of Lolita, nor did he make a Book of Testament for us to review and follow.
I'm not even sure if it was meant to be a personal view report or an essay, but either way its extremely wrong. If your teacher really wanted to look up this fashion, she would be mislead by what you presented. If Lolita was to be graded by the majority of the online lolita community like a History paper graded by a teacher, it would be pointed out multiple times that it lacks an abundant amount of information. Yes, it is your view, but all you are showing is "your view" and you're not supplying information that is worthwhile.
-...quand le soleil sera couché dans ton âme froide.- "To the World, we are kids with high allowances, or patience for sewing, who line the streets in busy sections of cities. " I said TO THE WORLD, for a point. We are SEEN by most people as something we are not. That is why I also started out with the websters definition, but ended with another. Thats just what people see it as. AND the vast majority of Lolita I know are 19 and under.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 15, 2008 7:39 pm
Jolie Rini
+_+
I'm sorry, but I suggest doing a little more research and more talking to experienced lolitas. Remember, Lolita Fashion in Japan is far different than the aspect in Western countries. A majority of us do not have wealthy or willing parents that gives us money to afford the clothes. I don't think there are many lolitas that follow the lifestyle either (it's mainstream society after all), at least I've never felt that way. But yes, I do like the idea that lolitas wear the clothes as a form of comfort (in this or our own world) because it's not as harmful as alternatives (drugs, cutting, etc.). And I'm sure every follower of lolita fashion feels that way. Plus, it's fun. Not everyone is prim and proper (heck, I'm in the track and field team. There's no time to be prim and proper if you've got a mile sprint to do). It's more like, "I can be myself" just as you described in the essay.
Also, not everyone thinks of Mana when it comes to Lolita. In all honesty, I really dislike him as a fashion icon. Nana Kitade would be my loli icon. The long time lolitas would probably think of Novala Takemoto, a large promoter of the fashion and lifestyle (he's crazy, but we love him). Oh and Kana mostly models for ero-loli style (sometimes cosplay coordinates).
Well, saying that a lolita doesn't fight, I might as well not be a lolita then (actually, I stick to the ideas of pacifism myself, but it makes me feel a little lazy in character. Still, there may be a lot more girls who don't defend themselves at all).
I don't think Lolita Fashion has a leader. We're pretty much independent even if we are fans of models, artists, and egl members who wear the fashion.The allowance part was supposed to be taken as the wrong look. "To the world", the vast majority of what was being said in that essay was a compare and contrast.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:19 am
-C'est la lune qui conduit la danse...-
Your "P.O.V." is flawed when it comes to essay writing. :/ IMO, it's not even AP English-worthy, let alone the essays I've seen in regular English courses, whether it's in grade 9 or grade 12. Whether or not it's your POV, you're making it so that it seems that's what multiple people believe, when that might even be the case. When it's YOUR P.O.V., you KEEP talking about YOU. Not "WE". There is not more than 1 person in ONE person's P.O.V.
Btw, "To the World" comment is still not something you should say, speaking that the majority of thoughts ARE making fun of lolitas because we remind them of "Mary Poppins", or "Bo Peep" like you've mentioned. Money wouldn't be at the top of the mind compared to how ridiculous we look to the world.
Please, if you need to use CAPSLOCK and BOLD to clarify yourself rather than regular text, then it's quite obvious that you are not ready for those who have constructive criticism, whether or NOT it's harsh.
-...quand le soleil sera couché dans ton âme froide.-
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:06 am
Originally, I skipped over reading your essay since there have been so many of them in the past. Because of the impending drama, however, I've decided to read it and offer you some feedback, since it seems like you aren't taking that which was given to you by others very well.
I'm going to ignore your grammar and writing style, since you've said that you're in high school and only sixteen, and instead cover the points in your essay. Regardless of your age, however, you should have been expecting feedback on your essay and I'm kind of raising my eyebrows over your "shouted" response a few posts back.
Anyway, here goes:
+ First of all, you state that it's a point of view essay, a short paper written to describe what lolita means to you.
Unfortunately, your paper does not read as a personal declaration so much as a definition and community statement. The "written from interviews of you!" part is both misleading and contradictory. If it's your point of view, why are you talking about other lolita's opinions in your title? Their words should be used to support your opinion on facts or to give you inspiration on ideals, sure, but they should not be the focus of an essay on "what it means to me." Also, most of the points that you present as being fact are not fact, but opinion, and this is frankly quite problematic even within your particular goal for the essay. For example:
A Lolita, in the fashion world and sense of the word, is a very prim, proper, and typically egotistical person.
This is an opinion on your part, not fact. Not all lolitas are very prim and proper, though many are egotistical simply because of the way that fashion works. Not all, however, can be classed as egotistical since the connotation generally associated with the word is one such that it is a negative and not a positive. Sure, lolita's a way to show yourself off, so of course people are going to do their best to look their best. It does not, however, mean that you care less for others than you do for yourself. It also doesn't mean a lolita is going to curtail her usual behavior or all behave like the princesses that they are dressed as, however.
A few other examples where you take opinion and make it into fact, or simply make-something-up and present it as fact:
But to be a Lolita, not just a mannequin, the wearer has to be an over all good person[...]If you are dressed like an angel, you better act like one. <- In addition to being opinion presented as fact, this also contradicts your definition of a lolita being egotistical. People who only think of themselves, generally are not good people deep down inside.
... most people try to exude a quiet, sweet dominance. <- I'm guessing you're talking about online lolitas. The ones I know, in person, are anything but quiet and sweet. One of them runs a rollerderby league, for crying out loud. Again, you're speaking from personal experience and trying to pass it off as fact.
It is an idea, started with some bows and lace on an expensive dress, transforming into a lifestyle and ideology of being something beautiful and elegant. To Lolita, it is a way of life. <- Again. Opinion. Not everyone wears lolita in order to form a certain ideology. Everyone's lifestyle varies, and not all lolitas center their lives around wearing it twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.
He is the one who started the movement and he is one of the owners of the major Lolita labels. <- Incorrect. He helped to popularize the movement in Japanese culture, but it was around long before he got a hold of it. Angelic Pretty has been around since before he was born and the movement began in the 70s when Mana was little more than a child, I'm afraid.
Also, in many places, You attempt to speak for others, rather than yourself. If this is a personal paper, why are you using the "we" statements and interviews at all? It doesn't fit with your original goal, and in my opinion it invalidates your essay to anyone who isn't completely new to the fashion. A few examples:
We want to be a physical manifestation of innocence, purity, uprightness, and perfection, and that’s just how we act. <-This should have been "I want to", since you're trying to speak for yourself, not the rest of us.
The only place in which you make a statement that is all-encompassing that doesn't bother me is "the world views us as" since you're trying to make a contrast between what you think and what the outsiders think.
A true Lolita doesn’t fight. <- This one got me laughing, I have to admit. If someone is attacking me, I am going to fight back; whether it's a verbal or physical assault, I'm not going to just sit there and let someone hurt me.
Our God and our spokesperson, is Mana. <- Like others have already said. "Your" god and "your" spokesperson.
To be honest, I think that these should have been the points you stuck with for your paper, rather than presenting your ideals as the end-all-and-be-all of lolita:
Everyone has a different view, it is “a personal style”, “a way of life”, “a statement”, “It's the attitude which qualifies a Lolita.”
It is a sisterhood, where in we all seek each other out for comfort and common bonds. It is a career, fueling a passion and talent for sewing and design.
Your entire paper is littered with poorly organized opinions masquerading as fact. The research you did seems to have been limited to a very small pool of interviews which rather conveniently fit with your mindset and you have used them poorly. Either don't bother with interviews next time, or find more credible sources. You got a good grade on this with your instructor, sure, but I'm going to warn you that this sort of single-mindedness disguised as truth does not fly in most circles beyond high school English. You have facts that are wrong, opinions that are not facts, opinions you try to express as being those of the majority, but no credible research to back you up.
Next time that you use interviews, do a broader poll. Don't hang around on Gaia, where most of the "lolitas" neither wear, nor understand the clothing, but try some larger communities for feed back. Be clear, don't using leading questions, and please do try to take critique a bit better.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|