Welcome to Gaia! ::

respect the 2 amendmet

The Second amendment was made to keep the government from becoming a tyranny, monarchy, etc. Military can't come and walk over everyone like they did back then. Now the government has to be a democracy so "everyone has a say" or they'll have a revolt on their hands, and in most cases civilians are better shots than army lol and thus the revolutionists win and more damage would be done than was necessary. Its like the old saying, tho most of you remember it from V for Vendetta, "The people should not be afraid of the government. The government should be afraid of its people." Our forefathers established this because they know some sly mother...... would try to take over completely *cough* Obama *cough* *cough* Liberals *cough,* but if they try then the American people have more of a "guarantee" that there rights won't be taken away.
Fatima al-Faqadi has the idea, but to elaborate its the law abiding citizens will be forced to be defenseless while the criminal populace will have a reign of terror, nothing would stop them. So what do liberals decide to do? Make taxes higher for everything, which by the way, still doesn't affect the criminal populace, it just makes us all the more pissed off. If they would take the time to think about it, they would realize they are f*ing retarded. If someone came and robbed them at gunpoint they would harp on this issue even harder to get rid of guns and still not realize that the guy who just robbed them will keep his gun. Liberals are the mental handicap in the government, not saying everyone, just those that try to make things better for everyone, but are in fact making things worse overall, "liberals." I'm starting to get off subject now so I'll stop before I go to far. If anyone would like to have a sociable argument please fill free to PM me, but if you start to get childish and butt hurt I'm gonna call you a liberal and piss you off even more then leave it at that.

If you were an actual socialist you'd know that a true socialism involves absolutely NO leadership. A true socialism has EVERYONE as equals. Money would not be needed, everyone would have what they needed. This will never work, however, due to human nature. Humans need someone to follow, thus meaning others will want to have more than others. Humans are corrupt so we'll never have a perfect society. Read Utopia, it IS the perfect society. The nature of Socialism has been perverted throughout the years, Yes, communism and marxism are socialist in nature, but have completely diverse ideals than what was originally intended for socialism, one of which, having a leader. Closest thing there was to a true socialism were Native American tribes, they had Elders however and depending on what Fancy school graduate you talk to were either "Leaders" or merely there for guidance, each one holds a valid point.

You misunderstood me (I'm not the best with words). I meant the Modern Liberals were too authoritative for me. I already told you that I'm a democratic socialist, and they want equality economically and complete freedom socially. I'm also aware that socialism can do a u-turn and become communism if it's a large enough country. I seem a little more optimistic than you when it comes to human nature too. I have hope that one day people will be able overcome the need to have more than their neighbor. Now I'm going to simply say let's agree to disagree, move on, then get back to the important thing we agree on: people want to take away our guns. This shouldn't happen.

卍 The quieter you become, the more you can hear.

May you attain enlightenment. 卍

lol the people we need guns to defend against are the people that are making it so morons think we shouldnt have guns