|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 2:23 pm
Yahoo! News linkQuote: ATLANTA - In a troubling reversal, the nation's teen birth rate rose for the first time in 15 years, surprising government health officials and reviving the bitter debate about abstinence-only sex education. The birth rate had been dropping since its peak in 1991, although the decline had slowed in recent years. On Wednesday, government statisticians said it rose 3 percent from 2005 to 2006. The reason for the increase is not clear, and federal health officials said it might be a one-year statistical blip, not the beginning of a new upward trend. However, some experts said they have been expecting a jump. They blamed it on increased federal funding for abstinence-only health education that doesn't teach teens how to use condoms and other contraception. Some key sexually transmitted disease rates have been rising, including syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The rising teen pregnancy rate is part of the same phenomenon, said Dr. Carol Hogue, an Emory University professor of maternal and child health. "It's not rocket science," she said. At the same time, some research suggests teens are using condoms far more often than they did 15 years ago. The new teen birth numbers are based on the 15-19 age group of women, which accounted for most of the 440,000 births to teens in 2006. The rate rose to nearly 42 births per 1,000 in that group, up from 40.5 in 2005. That translates to an extra 20,000 births to teen mothers. In 1991, the peak year for teen births, there were nearly 62 births per 1,000. The new report is based on a review of more than 99 percent of the birth certificates from last year by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The report, released Wednesday, quickly took on political implications. Opponents of abstinence-based programs seized on the data as evidence of wrong-headed government policy. "Congress needs to stop knee-jerk approving abstinence-only funding when it's clear it's not working," said U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo., who is pushing for more comprehensive sex education. The new report offers a state-by-state breakdown of birth rates overall. Many of those with the highest birth rates teach abstinence instead of comprehensive sex education, according to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. And research has concluded that abstinence-only programs do not cause a decrease in teenage sexual activity, Planned Parenthood officials added. "In the last decade, more than $1 billion has been wasted on abstinence-only programs," said Cecile Richards, the organization's president, in a prepared statement. Decreased condom use and increased sexual activity are two likely explanations for the higher teen birth rate. But not all data supports those theories, said John Santelli, a professor of population and family health at Columbia University's school of public health. For example, a biannual government survey of high school students found that the percentage of those who said they used a condom the last time they had sex rose to 63 percent in 2005, up from 46 percent in 1991. Contraceptive-focused sex education is still common, and the new teen birth numbers reflect it's failing, argued Moira Gaul of the Family Research Council, a conservative advocacy organization in Washington, D.C. The CDC also reported that births to unwed mothers reached an all-time high in 2006, but that is part of a continuing upward trend and was expected. Health officials cautioned that the rise in teen births is not the chief cause of births to unwed mothers, however. Women in their 20s and 30s represent the largest proportion, with teens accounting for fewer than a quarter, said Stephanie Ventura, head of the CDC's reproductive statistics branch. About thirty years ago, more than half of unwed mothers were teenagers, she said. The report on births also showed: _That the U.S. fertility rate is at the highest level since 1971, at 2.1 children. That is an increase of 2 percent from 2005 to 2006. _Total births rose 3 percent to nearly 4.3 million in 2006. _Rate of Caesarean section deliveries also rose 3 percent, setting a new record of 31 percent of all births. Health officials say the rate, which has risen by about half since 1996, is higher than is medically necessary. The high C-section rate is believed to at least partly explain why rates of preterm and low-weight births also rose in 2006. Planned deliveries, including those involving C-sections, are often done before a pregnancy comes to full term, health experts said. "Surprising government health" Are you serious? If you preach BS and believe in BS, you're not going to get grade A outcomes. Bastards. "The reason for the increase is not clear" Oh! It just can't be the abstinence-only-you-have-sex-you'll-get-syphillis-and-die + condoms don't work programs. [/sarcasm]
I'm surprised someone didn't throw in the fact that more babies are born during times of war.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:22 am
I thought more babies were born immediatly following a war...
Also: I agree... how dumb can some one be? "We're not teaching kids to use condoms, so we don't understand why these girls are getting pregnant, we told them Not to have sex!"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:37 am
*confoozles* do birth numbers increase during wars because everyone wants to have that "one more time" with their SO before they're shipped off to fight? xD
At least, that's the only reason I can figure unless everyone and their mama is playing with the boy next door.. eek
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:41 am
I don't understand how people can see the statistics along with the crap teens are being taught, and not come to the conclusion that abstinence only sex ed doesn't work. The evidence is right there, and now it's kicking them in the face!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:34 pm
[url=http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2007/12/teen_birth_rate.php]Speculation Without Evidence[/url] Teen Birth Rates on the Rise - Speculation Without EvidenceA newly released CDC report shows that there was a 3 percent increase in births among 15-19 year olds, and a 4 percent increase among those 18-19 years of age. It didn't take long for groups to offer explanations as to why there was an increase, despite the fact that the report doesn't offer any real explanation: "The national policy of abstinence-only programmes just isn't working," Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, said. "In the last decade more than $1bn has been wasted on abstinence-only programmes, when studies show they don't reduce the number of teen pregnancies or sexually transmitted infections." - Cecile Richards, President, Planned Parenthood Since a number of studies have placed the majority share of the credit for declining rates with more effective contraceptive use, it is reasonable to raise serious concerns about the $1.5 billion dollars the government has spent over the last decade on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs that prohibit information about the use of contraception including condoms.- Advocates for Youth Press Release, PR Newswire Without detailed data that could explain why there was an increase, such as decreases in overall abstinence and contraceptive use, these statements amount to nothing more than irresponsible speculation. It is expected that these groups will make similar statements in the coming election year, in an attempt to secure increased funding for contraception related programs. And as far as wasted money goes, these increases don't bode well for the self righteous contraception crowd. Despite the fact that contraception is available at numerous places including restroom vending machines, drug stores, health clinics, convenience stores, hotels, and Planned Parenthood, teen birth rates rose. To top it off, these groups have the nerve to ask for further funding so that they can continue to not solve the problem of teen pregnancy. I found this on Pro-Life Blogs.com and I thought I should share. Can anyone explain to me what the ******** this guy is smoking to make him think the bolded. Or even the entire thing. WHAT THE ********!!!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 4:53 pm
LadyInWhite [url=http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2007/12/teen_birth_rate.php]Speculation Without Evidence[/url] Teen Birth Rates on the Rise - Speculation Without EvidenceA newly released CDC report shows that there was a 3 percent increase in births among 15-19 year olds, and a 4 percent increase among those 18-19 years of age. It didn't take long for groups to offer explanations as to why there was an increase, despite the fact that the report doesn't offer any real explanation: "The national policy of abstinence-only programmes just isn't working," Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, said. "In the last decade more than $1bn has been wasted on abstinence-only programmes, when studies show they don't reduce the number of teen pregnancies or sexually transmitted infections." - Cecile Richards, President, Planned Parenthood Since a number of studies have placed the majority share of the credit for declining rates with more effective contraceptive use, it is reasonable to raise serious concerns about the $1.5 billion dollars the government has spent over the last decade on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs that prohibit information about the use of contraception including condoms.- Advocates for Youth Press Release, PR Newswire Without detailed data that could explain why there was an increase, such as decreases in overall abstinence and contraceptive use, these statements amount to nothing more than irresponsible speculation. It is expected that these groups will make similar statements in the coming election year, in an attempt to secure increased funding for contraception related programs. And as far as wasted money goes, these increases don't bode well for the self righteous contraception crowd. Despite the fact that contraception is available at numerous places including restroom vending machines, drug stores, health clinics, convenience stores, hotels, and Planned Parenthood, teen birth rates rose. To top it off, these groups have the nerve to ask for further funding so that they can continue to not solve the problem of teen pregnancy. I found this on Pro-Life Blogs.com and I thought I should share. Can anyone explain to me what the ******** this guy is smoking to make him think the bolded. Or even the entire thing. WHAT THE ******** class="clear"> ... So what does this guy think caused the low birth rates to begin with? The Might of Reagan's p***s?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:11 pm
Veled LadyInWhite [url=http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2007/12/teen_birth_rate.php]Speculation Without Evidence[/url] Teen Birth Rates on the Rise - Speculation Without EvidenceA newly released CDC report shows that there was a 3 percent increase in births among 15-19 year olds, and a 4 percent increase among those 18-19 years of age. It didn't take long for groups to offer explanations as to why there was an increase, despite the fact that the report doesn't offer any real explanation: "The national policy of abstinence-only programmes just isn't working," Cecile Richards, the president of Planned Parenthood, said. "In the last decade more than $1bn has been wasted on abstinence-only programmes, when studies show they don't reduce the number of teen pregnancies or sexually transmitted infections." - Cecile Richards, President, Planned Parenthood Since a number of studies have placed the majority share of the credit for declining rates with more effective contraceptive use, it is reasonable to raise serious concerns about the $1.5 billion dollars the government has spent over the last decade on abstinence-only-until-marriage programs that prohibit information about the use of contraception including condoms.- Advocates for Youth Press Release, PR Newswire Without detailed data that could explain why there was an increase, such as decreases in overall abstinence and contraceptive use, these statements amount to nothing more than irresponsible speculation. It is expected that these groups will make similar statements in the coming election year, in an attempt to secure increased funding for contraception related programs. And as far as wasted money goes, these increases don't bode well for the self righteous contraception crowd. Despite the fact that contraception is available at numerous places including restroom vending machines, drug stores, health clinics, convenience stores, hotels, and Planned Parenthood, teen birth rates rose. To top it off, these groups have the nerve to ask for further funding so that they can continue to not solve the problem of teen pregnancy. I found this on Pro-Life Blogs.com and I thought I should share. Can anyone explain to me what the ******** this guy is smoking to make him think the bolded. Or even the entire thing. WHAT THE ******** class="clear"> ... So what does this guy think caused the low birth rates to begin with? The Might of Reagan's p***s? Also, he seems to believe birth control is currently easily available for everyone. In some states, that's true, at least in certain parts. (The two cities in my state that I've lived in, condoms are easy to find, and it's not that hard to find a doctor who'll prescribe birth control- and insurance has to cover it now). However, this is NOT true in all states. I'm sure some of you have stories of difficulties.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:21 pm
My take is. Just because it's available doesn't mean that teens KNOW HOW TO USE IT IF THEY ARE TAUGHT ITS EVIL AND DOESN'T WORK. Does this not sound logical to people like him?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:49 pm
I would like to point out this piece of internet tripe. I'll quote it for kicks: Quote: Much like Al Gore's claim that he invented the internet, Hillary is taking credit for the reduction in teen pregnancy rates between 1995 and 2005. "To address this important issue, my husband issued a call to action in 1995 to America's parents and leaders to join together to cut America's teen pregnancy rate by one-third over a decade. In order to help achieve this ambitious goal, I helped launch the National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy, and we successfully achieved a one-third reduction by 2005" Never mind that during this period, abstinence among teens was on the rise and state restrictions on abortions were given new strength by the Supreme Court's 1992 Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision. For example, a study by professor Michael New of the University of Alabama found that pro-life legislation, and not the influence of Bill or Hillary Clinton, resulted in significant reductions on the abortion rate among minors.And never mind that the partial birth abortion ban, which Hillary opposed and voted against, may have significantly changed public perception on abortion and its acceptability. Yes, folks, Hillary Clinton wants us to believe that increased abstinence and pro-life legislation did not have an impact on teen pregnancy and abortion rates. And of course, she blames the recent rise in teen birth rates on the Bush administration: "But the report released today indicates that under President Bush's leadership, we may be falling off track" So let's get this straight - Hillary caused teen pregnancy rates to drop by 1/3 over the span of a decade, George Bush is responsible for the recent rise in teen birth rates, Bill Clinton did not have sex with "that woman", and Al Gore invented the internet. Given these facts, how could anybody doubt that putting Hillary in the Oval office will once and for all end teen pregnancy? To receive these and other news tips, e-mail blogblaster-at-gmail-dotcom and include the word "subscribe" in the subject line.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:16 pm
Quote: Despite the fact that contraception is available at numerous places including restroom vending machines.... I've never seen this. But that could be because I'm female, and all we've got are tampon/pad machines. Often locked up behind a counter or something similar so that you have to ask for assistance, which is embarrassing. All? Low-cost? Free? Same as drug/grocery stores. And do they even sell them to minors? Again, is it easily available, hassle-free and low cost? Quote: ...and Planned Parenthood.... Gotta ********' love how he mentions them separate from health clinics, as if they're not one. And the HUGE error he's made with all of this is that it's CONDOMS that are available at these places, not contraception in general. The birth control pill is NOT easy to obtain, especially not for minors. EDIT: However... he does have a point in that correlation is not causation. Abstinence-only and the rise in birth rates may go hand-in-hand, but we cannot say that one causes the other. There could be other factors.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|