zz1000zz
AnarchoManiac
zz1000zz
Wyedg
zz1000zz
...do you really not draw a distinction between a Powerpoint presentation and an article?
Who ever said anything about an article? I was just referring to a paper that was written at the college level as opposed to just some grade-schooler's crayon scribbles.
Regardless of that, this source was neither. It was a Powerpoint presentation.
Hence its invalid. Why? Because zz1000zz is the one who decides these things.
This is a lie, as is most of your new signature. That it is a Powerpoint presentation means it is a Powerpoint presentation, not a university paper.
I never claimed that was the reason it was invalid. Please stop lying.
So why is it invalid? You haven't given a valid reason yet. You say its unverifiable, yet others in the thread say otherwise.
Also, my signature isn't a lie. I can back it up easily if people only asked, like the time when you stated that my source was invalid because it was a blog (ad hominem). Yet you can use yours because you decided out of thin air that it was valid? Oh, what about the time when McIntyre, your source says "There is a distinct possibility that researchers have either purposefully or
subconsciously selected series with the hockey stick shape" which basically means "they are conspiring either consciously or subconsciously to push the hockey stick"
I can back up my entire signature if I wished ^_^
Its up to you to tell me to do so. Now now, don't go and edit all your posts, zz!
I don't lie. Provide evidence of such instances. Do not slander my name like this. Its blasphemous.
Reply
