|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:51 pm
Note that will not be the total amount of cards the game will ever have, just for the first few weeks at most.
Pros of 60 Cards: Game will be ready for play sooner. Less stress on me. =P
Cons of 60 Cards: Less customization of decks.
Pros of 90 Cards: More customization for decks.
Cons of 90 Cards: Game will take longer to be ready for play. I get annoyed making cards rather quickly x.x
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:15 pm
Wow, nice work there.
As painstaking as it would be...The more cards for people to use, the better.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:33 pm
I understand you wanting to get it done as quickly as possible, but the more cards you have, the more options there are available. Besides, that doesn't mean we can't playtest before the set's all finished...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:30 am
seems like you got a few cards made.. i wonder what the back cover looks like..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:49 am
darksoul seems like you got a few cards made.. i wonder what the back cover looks like.. There's no reason to make the back of them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:53 am
J 4 C K darksoul seems like you got a few cards made.. i wonder what the back cover looks like.. There's no reason to make the back of them. I guess he was assuming that they'd actually be printed someday...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:53 am
J 4 C K darksoul seems like you got a few cards made.. i wonder what the back cover looks like.. There's no reason to make the back of them.i know...but i will still wonder how it would look if there was an actual card made..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:07 am
darksoul J 4 C K darksoul seems like you got a few cards made.. i wonder what the back cover looks like.. There's no reason to make the back of them.i know...but i will still wonder how it would look if there was an actual card made.. It would look like an infinite void...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:23 pm
Lol. I'm pretty sure that facedown cards won't be involved in the game, at least not in the current cards. Possibly in a later set. smile I did have a bit of an idea though; the old pink gaia "G" with a light blue background and a thick white border.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:54 pm
Clitical Hit! Lol. I'm pretty sure that facedown cards won't be involved in the game, at least not in the current cards. Possibly in a later set. smile I did have a bit of an idea though; the old pink gaia "G" with a light blue background and a thick white border. Which is exactly what I imagined it as. Good to see someone remembering classic Gaia... emo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:42 pm
There should be a minimum for a deck size but no maximum, like Magic the Gathering, because then you are choosing how frequently a card shows up and such.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:55 pm
Red Kutai Clitical Hit! Lol. I'm pretty sure that facedown cards won't be involved in the game, at least not in the current cards. Possibly in a later set. smile I did have a bit of an idea though; the old pink gaia "G" with a light blue background and a thick white border. Which is exactly what I imagined it as. Good to see someone remembering classic Gaia... emo
thats what i was thinking too..
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:01 pm
jacksfinest There should be a minimum for a deck size but no maximum, like Magic the Gathering, because then you are choosing how frequently a card shows up and such.
Yeah. Minimum 30.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|