|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:49 pm
Do you think TNA might lose some of it's luster? I mean, the only reason I watched TNA was because the WWE was getting boring. But if the WWE finally gets back to one brand, do you think TNA might lose some of its fanbase?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:20 am
I don't think TNA will lose its fanbase because even if WWE goes back to one brand they will keep feeding us the same repetitive bullshit that we have been getting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:10 pm
Even if WWE is boring, I don't just watch TNA because of that. I think TNA's a great show on its own, so even if WWE does merge the rosters it wouldn't affect my opinion and hopefully others' opinions on TNA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:21 pm
MQuestionable Even if WWE is boring, I don't just watch TNA because of that. I think TNA's a great show on its own, so even if WWE does merge the rosters it wouldn't affect my opinion and hopefully others' opinions on TNA. Not only that, it could make TNA even better. If WWE something like getting rid of the brands TNA would have to do something equally big and that could put them on the map.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:03 am
WWE is so far gone by now, I dont think any one will really care if they come back together. TNA has hired alot of WWE's former talent, and thats why ppl have been sticking with it. Booker T is going to explode in this franchise, and the ppl wil flock to it, just as they did when he exploded in WWE. The ppl follow the wrestlers, if the wrestlers go to TNA, the fans are more likely to follow their favs. Angle is a good example of that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 9:24 am
Suffocate, You Suffocate
Don't Lie, Your Fake...TNA needs to step it up too, after sitting through the Turkey Bowl 5 mins of commercials 2 seconds of match. Not to mention "Stick a fork in this punk, he's done!" Are we 5 years old and that is supposed to seem cool or funny?
Russo craps all over everything he touches, TNA is pulling a WCW hiring old WWE talent, I mean if they wanted to do something original and new, they would have given Joe the title instead of letting Kurt b***h and moan about how he feels angles are crap, and he is the best champion blah blah blah.
Christian Cage losing his win steak on Impact! that should be reserved for PPV, don't give that away on free TV.
This is the same stuff that caused WCW to go under.
I don't care either way. Competition is good for the business, but right now TNA is competing against WWE, and WWE is competing against no one. I want to see TNA succeed, but they need to get rid of Russo for that to work. ...Suffocate, You Suffocate
You Always Take, What You Get!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:33 am
Since TNA has a bad habit of picking up the scraps that WWE throws them if the brand split ends they'll get rid of ALOT of talent that will most likely be hired by TNA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:30 pm
well right now we basiclly have the same old brands, WWE (Raw), ECW and wCw (Smackdown, notice how Raw is the only one of the three that actually has WWE in the name). If all three of those turned into one show again, they would have to have it be like 4hrs long to allow all of the superstars who should have air time to get it. what they need to do is get better writers. although, i do admit they have gotten better over the past few weeks. i have actually started watching Raw again, i am going to give SD and "ECW" a chance again (although i dont expect much from "ECW").
ECW would be alot better if they made it ECW. give it what it should have, no rules matches. put the E back in ECW, that would be right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 3:30 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:21 pm
If the new Wrestling Wars start up again when TNA gets a Monday show, I WWE will lose this war this time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:46 pm
Dead thread is DEAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 10:02 pm
most definitely NOT, TNA is good because of its Talent, exciting characters, intense highflyers, super cool submissionists, and great storylines and backstage antics
all WWE seems to has is john cena, the angry heels, and evan bourne
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 5:45 am
John Baylor If the new Wrestling Wars start up again when TNA gets a Monday show, I WWE will lose this war this time. Hahaha really? TNA couldn't last 10 weeks, I think they ended up doing 5?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 5:03 pm
Yuke of XV John Baylor If the new Wrestling Wars start up again when TNA gets a Monday show, I WWE will lose this war this time. Hahaha really? TNA couldn't last 10 weeks, I think they ended up doing 5? Something like that, they went back to Thursdays as soon as I got used to them being on Mondays though annoyingly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
![[PWG] Ruin_x's avatar](https://a1cdn.gaiaonline.com/dress-up/avatar/ava/80/4e/c0f23091b4e80_flip.png?t=1343068051_6.00_00)
