|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:23 am
An airline crew faced a rebellion when they told passengers they were going to fly on a jet that had lost its wing tip in a runway crash.
The SriLankan Airlines customers had been on the Airbus A340 a day earlier when it sliced through a wing of a stationary British Airways 747 at Heathrow, delaying departure by 24 hours.
So they were amazed to be boarding the same plane next day for the ten-hour flight to Colombo.
When cabin crew then admitted there was still a 5ft wing tip missing, there was "a minor revolt" as seven passengers demanded to be let off the aircraft.
A further two-hour delay followed as their baggage was removed before the aircraft could take off.
Club-class passenger Ian McKie, 54, from Loughton, Essex, said: "We were put up in hotels the night of the crash and next morning we were told we would be on a different plane that day.
"We only realised that we were actually going on the same aircraft when we got to the Club lounge and saw the plane but without its wing tip."
The former policeman, who was jetting off for a two-week holiday with his partner Gill Stone, 52, added: "On board, the cabin crew admitted that it was the same one as last time and that the tip had been ripped off.
A closer view shows the broken wing on the BA 747
"They assured us it didn't matter but a number of the passengers insisted that they would rather get on the next flight."
The collision happened shortly after 10pm two weeks ago when the BA011 flight to Singapore was waiting on a runway, followed by the SriLankan Airbus.
The SriLankan aircraft wing ripped through the BA flight's wing, tearing off a huge chunk and resulting in the BA jumbo being grounded.
SriLankan Airlines insisted there was no danger in flying without a wing tip.
It added: "They are purely for aerodynamics and to keep fuel costs to a minimum. There is no impact on safety at all. Safety is our absolute priority."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:45 pm
Maybe they're right about the plane being safe.....but in matters of business....the customer is always right.....at least if it is a big enough group of customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:10 am
Those planes are built to fly with a single friggen engine. Those passengers are just being paranoid jerks, delaying everyone for 2 hours just because they don't understand aerodynamics.
The plane wouldn't be flying if it was unsafe, the aircraft company wouldn't want the negative reputation as well as paying all those insurance costs, they would prefer to delay their customers, again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:44 pm
FubarRedFerret Those planes are built to fly with a single friggen engine. Those passengers are just being paranoid jerks, delaying everyone for 2 hours just because they don't understand aerodynamics. The plane wouldn't be flying if it was unsafe, the aircraft company wouldn't want the negative reputation as well as paying all those insurance costs, they would prefer to delay their customers, again. For once, I agree with you. But they should have told the customers beforehand that it was the same plane. That way, the "paraniod jerks" wouldn't have even gotten on the plane, and things would have gone a lot more smoothly for everyone involved. These customers were told they would be on a different plane that day. Again, had they known it was the same plane they wouldn't have gotten on, and there would have been no delay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
