|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:26 pm
As fun as this sounds, I have to play the skeptic to make sure that it is done in correct procedure. With experiments like these, coincidence is sure to appear. Money gain or loss could also be blamed on anything from the economy to self delusion, where we think we have gained a strange amount of money simple because we expect it. Who knows, maybe something will turn up. Considering the fact I'm not very economically sound, I can't be a test subject but I'm familiar with testing procedure and can help judge. ^_^
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:34 pm
LoBo_23 If you want a spell to be safer, be more specific. It decreases the chance of success, but it also increases safety and such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 6:00 pm
just as another test, u could always give the half that WILL be tampered with, xcept 1 all the same spell.. but the 1 that dosent gets a super specific spell.. might take longer for it to take effect, but would be a good test to see if specific spells are more or less effective than a general one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:09 pm
If someone would like to volunteer to be the caster in this experiment, I would love that.
Criteria:
You must be fairly confident in your abilities. You are going to have to cast spells on people you are unfamiliar with, but still be applicable to a group of people.
Things to be tailored into the spell may be time constraints, and especially something specifically protecting the people the spell is being cast on, from undesirable circumstances of getting more money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2007 7:05 am
I would accept I usually only do spells for people I am extremely close to... or I tailor spells for specific people. I don't do mass spells, and usually not for this intent.
And I think I am a subject so a conflict of possition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 4:40 pm
i.. actually change my mind, i dont mind being not/tampered with.. if u already have too many then ill remain available as a judge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2007 6:22 pm
LoBo_23 If you want a spell to be safer, be more specific. It decreases the chance of success, but it also increases safety and such.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 1:51 pm
I'd hate to ruin your fun, but death boesn't always hurt. How about "Let no form of harm, damage, or change in the state of physically living be done"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
