|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 4:30 pm
By Jonathan Mummolo
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 12, 2007; A01
The labor pains were coming, so Jessica Hodges got going. The 26-year-old bank teller from Burke sped toward Inova Fairfax Hospital, but before she got there, the law got her -- 57 mph in a 35 zone. Reckless driving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:15 pm
According to the article, "Hodges said she felt rushed and couldn't adequately explain her situation to the judge, who found her guilty". If she couldn't explain the reason for speeding, why would it be the judge's fault?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twizted Humanitarian Crew
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:24 pm
thenerdqueen According to the article, "Hodges said she felt rushed and couldn't adequately explain her situation to the judge, who found her guilty". If she couldn't explain the reason for speeding, why would it be the judge's fault? because she though was about to have a freaking baby! I dunno what that feels like but I bet it hurts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:28 pm
By the time she had the trial, she had already had the baby.
And it also mentions in the article that she didn't actually have her baby that day - false alarm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
