|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 3:37 pm
Misunderstood you then, sorry. I've gotten hardly any sleep in a week and I keep getting things messed up. .__. 'Scuse any more mistakes, please. I'm sorry.
I still disagree with the religon thing, but that's an entirely different topic. Agree to disagree.
Do you mean what I said, then? Like... when you're brain dead already and your lungs can't even breath for themselves? I agree with that one. I don't neccesarily think we should starve them to death like in the Terry Shivo case a few years back, but if your vital organs can't work for themselves, you're time has come and gone.
Just the fact that it takes away the right for me to have children is enough to keep me away from it, really. Granted, I disagree with abortion and some say that is taking away rights, but that's another matter and there are other reasons for it. In general, I don't agree with taking away the basic human rights and such, and I'd file the right to procreate under basic rights. And I'd be extremely pissed off if someone made me have a certain amount of kids. Extremely.
I still hold to the idea that we're solving the population issue on our own, where the number of kids per couple have dropped signifcantly.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:40 pm
marshjazz @Aakiyana: Thanks for correcting me. I knew it was an Asian country and I thought Japan because of how small Japan is, so it would make since that they would have to put a limit, but I could be wrong after all I only clanced in it, in one of my books. @Dr: Well, I'm a democrat and believe in personal freedom (I am pro-chioce after al.) I just think life is something that shouldn't go to waste, and when it is it should be given up for someone/thing that deserves it. I knew they weren't yours, but most of them don't even give that good of a reason. They should be embelished a little. Like the virus one. Even virus's that we have cures for develop stronger strains so we have to make the cure stronger. Stoping treatement for some of these virus's would only result in death of everyone. Even the common cold can kill you.
Because I'm the thread owner I'm actually suppose to be somewhat neutral. If I'm not then people would consider me unfit because I would have the tendency to punish those who oppose my opinion. As I had stated above, this is a place for peaceful debate, not malicious fighting.
As for the virus opinion, I find that kind of interesting. They were meant to kill and I believe a virus mutates for survival. If we stopped curing the viruses would they stop mutating? Who knows. I just found it interesting.
Most of them are so small because I tried to summarize what they were saying without causing too much damage. Some of the people were extremely blunt or over embellished. Every embellish needed embellished otherwise it would look unfinished. Usually people just want you to get to the point so I tried to do that. Sometimes its best not to go way into things, like you did at the beginning of your post. If you had embellished on that I'm sure they'd call you a Neo-nazi, or however its spelled. And by "they" I mean anyone who felt offended. I'm part Jewish, but I don't feel hurt.
I believe in saying just enough to make a point while causing minimal to no damage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2007 4:16 pm
@Kat: No problem.
Agree to disagree about the religion thing.
Yeah, what you said basically.
I mean, it is an option. Maybe not the best option, but an option.
@Dr. You didn't offend me at all. You don't have to be neutral, you can't actually punish anyone, the only thing you could do is report the post if it is breaking ToS.
Yes, the viruses would stop mutating if we stop curing them, but they would stay at the advanced stage they are at. So they could do more damage, and if your body doesn't have anti-bodies for it, you'd probably die. That's why vaccines are so important. So that you have anti-bodies for viruses.
Yeah, I understand, but if those were ment to be debate starters they aren't embellished enough to really provoke a debate. Yeah, I see what your getting at, and your right, that is exactly why I didn't say more than just that one little bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
