|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 11:11 am
 My quest is simple...Anybody play Pokemon in here?
2B a Master!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:28 pm
I play Pokemon. It's a fun game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 3:45 pm
Meh...tis okay. Very easy game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 4:17 pm
It isn't so easy when you face ACTUAL people, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:57 am
Sir Brane Damuj It isn't so easy when you face ACTUAL people, though. It's easy if you know a fool-proof way to win. neutral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:57 am
I don't have many rules... To every fool proof way to win, theere is a fool proof way to stop someone from winning. What is your "fool proof" strategy?
...JUST NO EFFING DOUBLE BATTLES!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:39 pm
Sir Brane Damuj I don't have many rules... To every fool proof way to win, theere is a fool proof way to stop someone from winning. What is your "fool proof" strategy?
...JUST NO EFFING DOUBLE BATTLES! Yes, well there IS a way around my strategy, but I'm not telling. smile It's quite obvious, really. I'm not telling my strategy, either. razz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:32 pm
In other words... it doesn't exist.
Yeah, I play it. -prods Trainer Card- I'm a die-hard Dragon fan, and so of course, if it's not at least part Dragon, I refuse to use it unless one-hundred percent necessary (basically... until I get far enough in the game to get myself a Dragon). I was the sort of person who'd have a team with five Dragonairs and one Dragonite (for fly) on my old Silver version. Not undefeatable (against Ice-types, I was toast. Or... reverse toast), but ridiculously difficult to defeat, since other than my Dragonite, I only had one weakness that wasn't reciprocated. And with Fire attacks, even that one weakness was nearly obsoleted.
Of course, Dragon-Ground with Levitate is probably the best type combination if you've got to have a combination. Except you've now got a double Ice weakness. Hehe. -twitch- I despised Glacia with every fibre of my being when I was playing Ruby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 7:54 pm
Bacillus Anthracis In other words... it doesn't exist. Yep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:22 pm
Kreativ Sir Brane Damuj I don't have many rules... To every fool proof way to win, theere is a fool proof way to stop someone from winning. What is your "fool proof" strategy?
...JUST NO EFFING DOUBLE BATTLES! Yes, well there IS a way around my strategy, but I'm not telling. smile It's quite obvious, really. I'm not telling my strategy, either. razz Game shark? Hmm...that must be your strategy. Lvl 100...max stats...etc. Or the FEAR ratata thing! That's such a unique way to use Ratata.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:49 pm
Me uses computer game shark, level 100 charmander team, each knowing hyperbeam, fissure, blast burn, and FU
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 8:04 pm
Is it really worth your while to use attacks that miss so often, though? A few sand attacks, and you're sorta screwed. I always keep a no-miss in reserve, just for those occasions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
