|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:02 pm
Ianex Several of the arguments justifiable, several not, buts thats kinda irrelavent. Don't jump to conclusions, even if there is a strong basis for them, just let the commerce branch play out and see if it happens there. Cross that bridge when it comes up.
Nah, oh well. FAUST TIME!
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:04 pm
Omi, are you not in Commerce Branch?
I was just looking over everyone again...and it seems as though you are not.
Oh well...maybe we will meet up once we reach the higher ranks (assuming either makes it)
You seem like the kinda guy who would be fun to fight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:15 pm
I only have one character entered, and I only need one to deafeat you all.
Whoa, dunno where THAT came from.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:19 pm
I already semi-set up an entrance for one of my characters...just need the match to be listed >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:25 pm
I truely wanted to enter Commerce Branch - but the same day I decided on a character for it, was the day the last entries signed up and it was filled. XD Though surely - if I can make it high enough in Barton, hopefully we'll have a match of our own'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:28 pm
Well, if any of my characters survive, we can have a match after they recover too.
Though...I am more than willing to forfeit if it means some of my characters lives. I am willing to let my comedic character die...even if he is quite formidable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:33 pm
Dreslin Me versus Binatica? Why do have the feeling that if I can find a way to defend against psionics, that the match will never end due to a bitchfest from him/her? Typhoon_Omi It's a him, and trust me: it'll happen. Be prepared. domokun I don't use psionics, which would make it rather difficult for me to b***h about anti-psionics countermeasures. Only two of my characters have explicitly psionic abilities, and they're both simple telepathic-force attacks which were made with the expectation that they would fail because no one is going to let their character's mind be influenced. Typhoon_Omi But, psionics aside - Galmax will spend more time arguing this tournament, than he will roleplaying. In fact, this is already true thus far. Nice flamebait, but it's not true at all. I haven't had a single ruling against me yet, and I've won over half my matches without any arguements at all. Don't try to troll the troll, it's enough trouble for you to translate your epileptic keyboard-banging into posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:35 pm
Dr.Nightz I only have one character entered, and I only need one to deafeat you all.Whoa, dunno where THAT came from. Too much exposure to Ertai?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:36 pm
Binatica Dreslin Me versus Binatica? Why do have the feeling that if I can find a way to defend against psionics, that the match will never end due to a bitchfest from him/her? Typhoon_Omi It's a him, and trust me: it'll happen. Be prepared. domokun I don't use psionics, which would make it rather difficult for me to b***h about anti-psionics countermeasures. Only two of my characters have explicitly psionic abilities, and they're both simple telepathic-force attacks which were made with the expectation that they would fail because no one is going to let their character's mind be influenced. Typhoon_Omi But, psionics aside - Galmax will spend more time arguing this tournament, than he will roleplaying. In fact, this is already true thus far. Nice flamebait, but it's not true at all. I haven't had a single ruling against me yet, and I've won over half my matches without any arguements at all. Don't try to troll the troll, it's enough trouble for you to translate your epileptic keyboard-banging into posts.
Go tend to my missile again, biatch. domokun
And Ianex, surely. =P Though, people here whom intend to take my character out after a loss or if he 'forfeits', may be deeply disappointed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:37 pm
True, if worst comes to worst, the two characters that I care most about have the ability to teleport...which is up for disqualification...but if I am gonna die anyway...why not eh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:39 pm
Eh. My character can't "teleport", but I do have a number of technicalities I could exploit.
Such as: if I were to manage to get over an arena wall and land on the ground, my opponent couldn't pursue me to slay me - otherwise, he or she would still be disqualified, despite the fact my character was disqualified or forfeited prior. Because, the match still isn't declared "over" by Clash. And when it is, the thread's locked.
That's just one little means of keeping my a** alive.. though I'm doubting it'll come to that. domokun
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:52 pm
I'm hoping no one will come to that...but I know a few of my characters are more than willing to kill, even if its accidental. They do have sudden mood changes though...and it really all depends on the person.
Bah...all my characters are too different in some respects to determine what they would do in a given situation.
But pretty much all of them will not hesitate to end the life of someone who spends a good deal of time pissing them off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:53 pm
Life, liberty, and the pursuit to break my opponent's head in half.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:54 pm
Ryu Versher 777 Life, liberty, and the pursuit to break my opponent's head in half. I'm gonna be honest here...never seen a head broken in half before...split in half yes...but that must take a REALLY strong person to tear someones head in half!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 12:56 pm
*yawn* I guess I should get on that bio edit...*goes to find the proofing*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
