|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:07 am
Vivnox We hadn't asked APP, correct, but when she came back on she was asked and did approve of it. Bea hasn't even heard of her's yet because she is in the hospital for the labor thing as far as I know. Here's hoping Rachel doesn't give her a hard pregnancy and is healthy. That's fine, but I meant that it didn't matter whether or not she was asked, because it's still something personal. I mean if someone gave me permission to put their report card covered in D's and F's in my signature, it still would be against the ToS because whether or not it's okay with that person, it's still posting something private and personal in my signature, but they never did go into details about this in the ToS. So even if it's fine with me, her, you and everyone else on Gaia, it's still sort of breaking the rules.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:12 am
I know. But she's really the only one who can say anything. But as I said, any mod who tries to get rid of anyone from anyside is gonna hear from me.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:16 am
Pyrotechnic Oracle *sigh* I'm goign to sa this, and be done with it. Its not why they were constructed that bothers me, its the way they were constructed. It seems for not familier with some of the ridicules insults and acusation some of the pro-chpoicers love to swing around. THose being fascism, the tackign away of rights. And the other, subjication. I have already explained my point on this with no success at all. I am either ignored, or told I'm wrong. Pyro, you can't expect everyone to agree with you. Success is not defined as "Showing everyone that you are right." You made your point. I obviously didn't ignore it; But I did give you several reasons why you are wrong. Then you replied pretty much by repeating yourself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 9:32 am
Vivnox I know. But she's really the only one who can say anything. But as I said, any mod who tries to get rid of anyone from anyside is gonna hear from me. While we're still on the subject, how come I can't see your signature? Were they disabled for being too large?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:23 am
Lorysa Vivnox I know. But she's really the only one who can say anything. But as I said, any mod who tries to get rid of anyone from anyside is gonna hear from me. While we're still on the subject, how come I can't see your signature? Were they disabled for being too large?If it was disabled, you wouldn't be able to see any of her signature. I've had mine disabled before.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 10:44 am
Lorysa Vivnox I know. But she's really the only one who can say anything. But as I said, any mod who tries to get rid of anyone from anyside is gonna hear from me. While we're still on the subject, how come I can't see your signature? Were they disabled for being too large?I over used my bandwith.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 11:06 am
Vivnox Lorysa Vivnox I know. But she's really the only one who can say anything. But as I said, any mod who tries to get rid of anyone from anyside is gonna hear from me. While we're still on the subject, how come I can't see your signature? Were they disabled for being too large?I over used my bandwith. Oh, I see, and Oh.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:01 pm
Vivnox Pyrotechnic Oracle *sigh* I'm goign to sa this, and be done with it. Its not why they were constructed that bothers me, its the way they were constructed. It seems for not familier with some of the ridicules insults and acusation some of the pro-chpoicers love to swing around. THose being fascism, the tackign away of rights. And the other, subjication. I have already explained my point on this with no success at all. I am either ignored, or told I'm wrong. First of all, that wasn't directed to you. Lorysa had said that she couldn't prove WHY they were made so I was telling her why. I didn't quote her because if I remember, you don't like quote towers. And also, as I stated before. You saying that we support the killing of children. If you are going to say we commit lies and slander I'm going to call you out on yours. Especially since you never addressed that the last few times I mentioned it. What lies and what slander? Evenlooking at it form your point of you I see it as the killign of children. The fetus is bilogicly human and alive.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:02 pm
But it's not the goddamn KILLING that we support. At least not for me. As I've stated in my own thing, make the autoficial womb and make it so the fetus can be taken out at ANY time then there's no problem with abortion being illegal. You just need to have another choice avialable.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:03 pm
I.Am Pyrotechnic Oracle *sigh* I'm goign to sa this, and be done with it. Its not why they were constructed that bothers me, its the way they were constructed. It seems for not familier with some of the ridicules insults and acusation some of the pro-chpoicers love to swing around. THose being fascism, the tackign away of rights. And the other, subjication. I have already explained my point on this with no success at all. I am either ignored, or told I'm wrong. Pyro, you can't expect everyone to agree with you. Success is not defined as "Showing everyone that you are right." You made your point. I obviously didn't ignore it; But I did give you several reasons why you are wrong. Then you replied pretty much by repeating yourself. I repeated my self because oyu missed the point, or you made it look that way if you didn't.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:05 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle I.Am Pyrotechnic Oracle *sigh* I'm goign to sa this, and be done with it. Its not why they were constructed that bothers me, its the way they were constructed. It seems for not familier with some of the ridicules insults and acusation some of the pro-chpoicers love to swing around. THose being fascism, the tackign away of rights. And the other, subjication. I have already explained my point on this with no success at all. I am either ignored, or told I'm wrong. Pyro, you can't expect everyone to agree with you. Success is not defined as "Showing everyone that you are right." You made your point. I obviously didn't ignore it; But I did give you several reasons why you are wrong. Then you replied pretty much by repeating yourself. I repeated my self because oyu missed the point, or you made it look that way if you didn't. Disagreeing doesn't mean he missed the point.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:05 pm
Vivnox But it's not the goddamn KILLING that we support. At least not for me. As I've stated in my own thing, make the autoficial womb and make it so the fetus can be taken out at ANY time then there's no problem with abortion being illegal. You just need to have another choice avialable. You may not directly support the killing, and I'm not saying you do personly. But whether you realise or not, by saying you beilive woman shoudl have the right to abortions, you are supporting the right to have woman kill their children if they want.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:06 pm
Mcphee Disagreeing doesn't mean he missed the point. I didn't say that
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:15 pm
Pyrotechnic Oracle Mcphee Disagreeing doesn't mean he missed the point. I didn't say that You said he made it look like he missed your point, when all he did was disagree with you.
You implied as much.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:17 pm
Yeah, looking back through the pages, yoru right. Sorry.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|