|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 11:41 am
Fear My Bloody Fangs. I think the prince is hagrid all honestly. I mean he is half-blood... acutally, he's just half-gaint...
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:38 pm
READ THROUGH. IT'LL BE WORTH IT. I PROMISE!
Ok here's my take on the theory for the 7th book. (SPOILER ALERT!! SPOILER ALERT!!)
...
...
...
...
...
...
Ok well, Dumbledore, I think he's dead. They have his body and they entombed him (so to speak). After Ron was poisoned, Hagrid told Hermione and Harry that he overheard Snape and Dumbledore arguing. Snape told Dumbledore that 'he took too much for granted and that maybe he didn't want to do it anymore'. . . Snape hesitated when he was about to use the killing curse on Dumbledore. The book states that a look of utter disgust and hatred filled his face. (I'll come back to this in a second). Here's some of the reasons why Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him: 1. Dumbledore needs to find the location of the horcruxes, including one that we have no idea what it is. So Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him so that Voldemort and the other Death Eaters would have no reason to distrust him; (note the begining of the book with Bellatrix). 2. Dumbledore knows that Harry is still too young and inexperienced to fight Voldermort like the prophecy states. Harry not only has to get the Horcruxes and destroy them, but defeat Voldermort on his own. Harry regards Dumbledore as a father figure and loves him. THis would motivate Harry to destroy Voldemort. Also, on a side note, Dumbledore was deeply injured when destroying the first horcrux and even more so the second time around. I believe that because Voldemort "imprinted" Harry with his power, the latter would be more apt and able to retreave and destroy the other horcruxes. I think that Snape was hesitant to destroy Dumbledore. He knew that killing him would destroy his reputation, have the whole wizarding world against him and so forth. This is why Snape was hateful killing him. He was angry that Dumbledore could not find an alternative.
Lastly, Harry might possibly be an involuntary horcrux, so to speak. But I doubt it. I think it would prove anti-climactic to the rest of the series. Leaving something unknown and impossible to figure out would really tempt JKRowling's readers. She'd like that lol.
So what do you think? cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 5:40 pm
MORE SPOILER ALERT!!
...
...
...
...
...
Oh, and R.A.B. must be Regalus (Black's brother)... (It's been explained in other posts) 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:11 pm
I dunno if this has been mentioned or not... but I don't think Sirius is dead. I think he's just trapped behind the veil thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:54 pm
Dumbledore's dead. Jo doesn't insult her readers. When someone's dead, they're dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:00 pm
The Fluff Dumbledore's dead. Jo doesn't insult her readers. When someone's dead, they're dead. I guess that is true, since she didn't do that with a few of the characters who already died.. hmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:07 pm
AmunRa READ THROUGH. IT'LL BE WORTH IT. I PROMISE!
Ok here's my take on the theory for the 7th book. (SPOILER ALERT!! SPOILER ALERT!!)
...
...
...
...
...
...
Ok well, Dumbledore, I think he's dead. They have his body and they entombed him (so to speak). After Ron was poisoned, Hagrid told Hermione and Harry that he overheard Snape and Dumbledore arguing. Snape told Dumbledore that 'he took too much for granted and that maybe he didn't want to do it anymore'. . . Snape hesitated when he was about to use the killing curse on Dumbledore. The book states that a look of utter disgust and hatred filled his face. (I'll come back to this in a second). Here's some of the reasons why Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him: 1. Dumbledore needs to find the location of the horcruxes, including one that we have no idea what it is. So Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him so that Voldemort and the other Death Eaters would have no reason to distrust him; (note the begining of the book with Bellatrix). 2. Dumbledore knows that Harry is still too young and inexperienced to fight Voldermort like the prophecy states. Harry not only has to get the Horcruxes and destroy them, but defeat Voldermort on his own. Harry regards Dumbledore as a father figure and loves him. THis would motivate Harry to destroy Voldemort. Also, on a side note, Dumbledore was deeply injured when destroying the first horcrux and even more so the second time around. I believe that because Voldemort "imprinted" Harry with his power, the latter would be more apt and able to retreave and destroy the other horcruxes. I think that Snape was hesitant to destroy Dumbledore. He knew that killing him would destroy his reputation, have the whole wizarding world against him and so forth. This is why Snape was hateful killing him. He was angry that Dumbledore could not find an alternative.
Lastly, Harry might possibly be an involuntary horcrux, so to speak. But I doubt it. I think it would prove anti-climactic to the rest of the series. Leaving something unknown and impossible to figure out would really tempt JKRowling's readers. She'd like that lol.
So what do you think? cool yeah the last thing you said there, that harry is a horcrux. yeah its true. harry gonna die. nuff said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:11 pm
mason_rogers AmunRa READ THROUGH. IT'LL BE WORTH IT. I PROMISE!
Ok here's my take on the theory for the 7th book. (SPOILER ALERT!! SPOILER ALERT!!)
...
...
...
...
...
...
Ok well, Dumbledore, I think he's dead. They have his body and they entombed him (so to speak). After Ron was poisoned, Hagrid told Hermione and Harry that he overheard Snape and Dumbledore arguing. Snape told Dumbledore that 'he took too much for granted and that maybe he didn't want to do it anymore'. . . Snape hesitated when he was about to use the killing curse on Dumbledore. The book states that a look of utter disgust and hatred filled his face. (I'll come back to this in a second). Here's some of the reasons why Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him: 1. Dumbledore needs to find the location of the horcruxes, including one that we have no idea what it is. So Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him so that Voldemort and the other Death Eaters would have no reason to distrust him; (note the begining of the book with Bellatrix). 2. Dumbledore knows that Harry is still too young and inexperienced to fight Voldermort like the prophecy states. Harry not only has to get the Horcruxes and destroy them, but defeat Voldermort on his own. Harry regards Dumbledore as a father figure and loves him. THis would motivate Harry to destroy Voldemort. Also, on a side note, Dumbledore was deeply injured when destroying the first horcrux and even more so the second time around. I believe that because Voldemort "imprinted" Harry with his power, the latter would be more apt and able to retreave and destroy the other horcruxes. I think that Snape was hesitant to destroy Dumbledore. He knew that killing him would destroy his reputation, have the whole wizarding world against him and so forth. This is why Snape was hateful killing him. He was angry that Dumbledore could not find an alternative.
Lastly, Harry might possibly be an involuntary horcrux, so to speak. But I doubt it. I think it would prove anti-climactic to the rest of the series. Leaving something unknown and impossible to figure out would really tempt JKRowling's readers. She'd like that lol.
So what do you think? cool yeah the last thing you said there, that harry is a horcrux. yeah its true. harry gonna die. nuff said. Long stuff there man! Yeah I like how you wrote that, saying what you know, and what you're opionion is...hmmm I don't know if harry will die or not, but if he does it will be sad, and if he doesn't someone else would most likely die, like someone close to him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:22 pm
AmunRa READ THROUGH. IT'LL BE WORTH IT. I PROMISE!
Ok here's my take on the theory for the 7th book. (SPOILER ALERT!! SPOILER ALERT!!)
...
...
...
...
...
...
Ok well, Dumbledore, I think he's dead. They have his body and they entombed him (so to speak). After Ron was poisoned, Hagrid told Hermione and Harry that he overheard Snape and Dumbledore arguing. Snape told Dumbledore that 'he took too much for granted and that maybe he didn't want to do it anymore'. . . Snape hesitated when he was about to use the killing curse on Dumbledore. The book states that a look of utter disgust and hatred filled his face. (I'll come back to this in a second). Here's some of the reasons why Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him: 1. Dumbledore needs to find the location of the horcruxes, including one that we have no idea what it is. So Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him so that Voldemort and the other Death Eaters would have no reason to distrust him; (note the begining of the book with Bellatrix). 2. Dumbledore knows that Harry is still too young and inexperienced to fight Voldermort like the prophecy states. Harry not only has to get the Horcruxes and destroy them, but defeat Voldermort on his own. Harry regards Dumbledore as a father figure and loves him. THis would motivate Harry to destroy Voldemort. Also, on a side note, Dumbledore was deeply injured when destroying the first horcrux and even more so the second time around. I believe that because Voldemort "imprinted" Harry with his power, the latter would be more apt and able to retreave and destroy the other horcruxes. I think that Snape was hesitant to destroy Dumbledore. He knew that killing him would destroy his reputation, have the whole wizarding world against him and so forth. This is why Snape was hateful killing him. He was angry that Dumbledore could not find an alternative.
Lastly, Harry might possibly be an involuntary horcrux, so to speak. But I doubt it. I think it would prove anti-climactic to the rest of the series. Leaving something unknown and impossible to figure out would really tempt JKRowling's readers. She'd like that lol.
So what do you think? cool
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:28 pm
mason_rogers AmunRa READ THROUGH. IT'LL BE WORTH IT. I PROMISE!
Ok here's my take on the theory for the 7th book. (SPOILER ALERT!! SPOILER ALERT!!)
...
...
...
...
...
...
Ok well, Dumbledore, I think he's dead. They have his body and they entombed him (so to speak). After Ron was poisoned, Hagrid told Hermione and Harry that he overheard Snape and Dumbledore arguing. Snape told Dumbledore that 'he took too much for granted and that maybe he didn't want to do it anymore'. . . Snape hesitated when he was about to use the killing curse on Dumbledore. The book states that a look of utter disgust and hatred filled his face. (I'll come back to this in a second). Here's some of the reasons why Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him: 1. Dumbledore needs to find the location of the horcruxes, including one that we have no idea what it is. So Dumbledore would want Snape to kill him so that Voldemort and the other Death Eaters would have no reason to distrust him; (note the begining of the book with Bellatrix). 2. Dumbledore knows that Harry is still too young and inexperienced to fight Voldermort like the prophecy states. Harry not only has to get the Horcruxes and destroy them, but defeat Voldermort on his own. Harry regards Dumbledore as a father figure and loves him. THis would motivate Harry to destroy Voldemort. Also, on a side note, Dumbledore was deeply injured when destroying the first horcrux and even more so the second time around. I believe that because Voldemort "imprinted" Harry with his power, the latter would be more apt and able to retreave and destroy the other horcruxes. I think that Snape was hesitant to destroy Dumbledore. He knew that killing him would destroy his reputation, have the whole wizarding world against him and so forth. This is why Snape was hateful killing him. He was angry that Dumbledore could not find an alternative.
Lastly, Harry might possibly be an involuntary horcrux, so to speak. But I doubt it. I think it would prove anti-climactic to the rest of the series. Leaving something unknown and impossible to figure out would really tempt JKRowling's readers. She'd like that lol.
So what do you think? cool yeah the last thing you said there, that harry is a horcrux. yeah its true. harry gonna die. nuff said.
OMFG. That was totally my theory. The only one I've ever come up with on my own about HP... A bunch of people told me it was s**t... But I'm not the only one! So, ha ha ha! xD
Harry = accidental horcrux, which means, in order for Voldy to completly die, Harry's got to die, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:44 pm
I think Harry will die. If not, J.K. will create some way for him to live even if he is a horcrux. But if Ron dies... I will go mad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 2:12 pm
Okay, I am going to post my ideas. I know some of them have been mentioned, and alot of you will disagree(sp?) with me, but just let me say my part.
Spoilers!!
1) Harry isn't a Horcrux.
2)Wormtail helps harry in some way (he owes his life to harry).
3)Voldmort will die
4)One of the Weasleys will die, probably at the wedding.
5)Tonks and Lupin will get married.
6)Harry will go back to Hogwarts if only to get help from Dumbledor's painting.
7)Harry will find out that Serius had a panting done of himself and that he can talk to the painting.
cool Enven though Harry has told her not to come, Ginny will tag along and end up helping/saving Harry.
9)R.A.B. is Regulus(sp?). In the 5th book it was said that they found a locket no one could open, and that Regulus was killed because he deserted or betrayed the Dark Lord. What betterway to betray him then to take away the horcux? The Dark Lord could have left the fake horcrux in the cave, knowing that the stuff was poisen and kill whoever drank it to get tot he locket.
10)Ron and Hermione will get married. But Ron will be seriously hurt but not killed in some way.
I think I'm done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:21 am
In the 7th book, I think Harry is going to die. I mean just like in OoTP
Both cannot live while the other survives.
And usually series like this, rarely end happy.
I even read somewhere that J.K was in a public place and a kid came up to her and asked that she could make a book on Harry's adult hood. She said "Harry might not make it to adulthood. We'll just have to wait and see." And also when people say that. They usually mean Harry's not going to make it to adulthood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 5:52 am
devon1993391 In the 7th book, I think Harry is going to die. I mean just like in OoTP Both cannot live while the other survives. And usually series like this, rarely end happy. I even read somewhere that J.K was in a public place and a kid came up to her and asked that she could make a book on Harry's adult hood. She said "Harry might not make it to adulthood. We'll just have to wait and see." And also when people say that. They usually mean Harry's not going to make it to adulthood. I disagree with that last part. She's just saying it to be mysterious, and to avoid spoiling the outcome of the last book. Besides, if J.K. Rowling published a version in which Harry dies, there would be bookworm riots in no less than 8 languages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 6:52 am
The Fluff
OMFG. That was totally my theory. The only one I've ever come up with on my own about HP... A bunch of people told me it was s**t... But I'm not the only one! So, ha ha ha! xD
Harry = accidental horcrux, which means, in order for Voldy to completly die, Harry's got to die, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
