| Would you use an anonymous mule for a Mafia game? |
| Yes, as much as I use my main |
|
43% |
[ 7 ] |
| Yes, but it might affect my activity |
|
31% |
[ 5 ] |
| Yes, but it would definitely affect my activity |
|
12% |
[ 2 ] |
| Probably not. |
|
12% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 3:43 pm
Not much is happening today. It does suck having nothing to go off of.
What do we do?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:07 pm
After rereading everything, I don't see anyway of finding who is mafia. Now I think about it, it probably would have been better to lynch the first night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:11 pm
Vote Amber.
Sweet Amber Lynne Lady Psycho Sexy Sweet Amber Lynne Lady Psycho Sexy Ok now onto the srs buzness.
Amber led the vote on No Lynch fairly early, doncha think?
I didn't see her mention anywhere that she wouldn't be back for end of day, so the only thing I can gather from this is she's trying to swing a bandwagon.
Not really suspicious enough to merit an FoS on its own, just an observation. yes i led the no lynch vote but everyone here knows that if you don't and you go for a person you get Fos anyways so either way someone had to do it im a townie so i have nothing to hide and im not about to kill off a townie and help out the mafia. if i had of said i would be back then you would also think that i was mafia because i knew i would be here, so again anything i said would have done that. It's just not like you to throw a vote before you have to, that's all.
Anyway, I think that with no seer we should reconsider our no lynch policy. If both FCC and Hansen are active, there will be two kills tonight. That will most likely leave us down two townies with no significant leads. I don't like the sound of that. i know but i just didnt want to follow everyone else i wanted to say what i thought ^.^
Amber disappeared shortly after suspicions on her were dissolved and came back shortly after day's end.
Sweet Amber Lynne well that didnt turn out as bad as we thought it was it could have been worse now to get the other mafia She hasn't posted anything else all day. Her last login was roughly 5pm and I don't think she even checked. Not that this isn't true of mostly everyone as well, but I still think that and the combination of posting only to dissuade suspicion is the firmest lead I've got right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:13 pm
cerokelvin After rereading everything, I don't see anyway of finding who is mafia. Now I think about it, it probably would have been better to lynch the first night. We should scrutinize the posts of anyone who agreed with Stag, or vice versa. We should probably also try to figure out what made Chris Hansen target her. She's pretty new, so I don't think it was metagaming - maybe she was on to them, so we may be able to find clues in her posts as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:18 pm
l-Kathulu-l I don't think I'll be able to get on much tonight. Power out left my house without power and the comcast that provides internet with it. I'm at a friends now, so I dunno if the power will be on later so I can get on and cast a vote. So for now I'll do the usual No Lynch
Kath was the 2nd person to vote on the No Lynch.
melikefood Vote No lynchI've really got nothing to say on the first day hurrr. D:
Food the third, and the first person to technically bandwagon. Compare to Wylr, who didn't have any thoughts and simply didn't vote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:19 pm
I could see Amber too, she is usually decently active...
I am going to hold off a little on voting, see what else develops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:39 pm
For my defense I voted No Lynch. We never have a lead on the first day and that's what the vote always goes to. Plus, I had no power and mine as well vote and provide an excuse rather than being MIA for the rest of the day.
Also as for Amber her last words are pretty weird. "Now to get the other mafia." To me that seems just weird. Granted that we did get one mafia kill and one neutral, it seems like this was a careless statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 4:54 pm
l-Kathulu-l For my defense I voted No Lynch. We never have a lead on the first day and that's what the vote always goes to. Plus, I had no power and mine as well vote and provide an excuse rather than being MIA for the rest of the day. Also as for Amber her last words are pretty weird. "Now to get the other mafia." To me that seems just weird. Granted that we did get one mafia kill and one neutral, it seems like this was a careless statement. You had your own thoughts on it; Food didn't. I was more aiming at him.
What do you mean by weird? Do you mean claiming responsibility for the kill? I could see that, maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:20 pm
yes i know i haven't been active but i did look at the thread today and it had none here so i figured i would come back when i knew people would be here and posting im not gonna sit around in a thread nones in. and as for what i said i only ment that we got one so now to focus and get the others that are left.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:29 pm
I don't really have any thoughts on the matter. And I'm going to voice that, lest I get Suspicion'd again or something.
Really? I don't see why not Lynch. I just feel like if we go on not lynching, mafia will never die.
I think we should throw someone under the bus, have them argue their point, and see what happens from there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:32 pm
cerokelvin After rereading everything, I don't see anyway of finding who is mafia. Now I think about it, it probably would have been better to lynch the first night.
Also, I would still like to know the townie to mafia ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:22 pm
They're in the spamthread, lol.
40 minutes guys, get on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 6:36 pm
So I went back to try to read for clues...
I honestly dont have much... But all I can say is that amber seems a little weird with what she says, but not so much with her activity.
I cant say much accusation-wise, cause my little contribution early off in the game and being absent from the thread until now. xd
*shrug*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
