| Which control scheme are you using? |
| Wiimote |
|
6% |
[ 9 ] |
| Wiimote + Nunchuk |
|
27% |
[ 39 ] |
| Classic Controller |
|
10% |
[ 15 ] |
| GameCube controller |
|
55% |
[ 77 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:00 pm
Tatsuman Nero-K "There’s a character named Ness who has appeared in the Smash Bros. series up until now."
I just explained this one.
"So until now, I’ve always made sure to include handicaps in each game in the series."
Guess what, guys? We still have handicaps...
You have to admit, the context is a little different. Generally, you'd think that "(up) until now" would mean that the thing is not being included. The Ness portion could have been an average use of the word, and the handicap could have been an abnormal use of it.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:01 pm
it's two, come on update!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:03 pm
Meta_Fish Tatsuman Nero-K "There’s a character named Ness who has appeared in the Smash Bros. series up until now."
I just explained this one.
"So until now, I’ve always made sure to include handicaps in each game in the series."
Guess what, guys? We still have handicaps...
You have to admit, the context is a little different. Generally, you'd think that "(up) until now" would mean that the thing is not being included. The Ness portion could have been an average use of the word, and the handicap could have been an abnormal use of it. In all honesty, it could have been.
But saying he's not included because of that statement isn't really valid. None the less, we will find out by Jan 24th.
Many "I told you so"s will be exchanged, regardless of Ness' inclusion or lack thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:03 pm
Holy ******** christ I GOT AN UPDATE GUESS RIGHT!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:04 pm
Woah, there was a scene in the SSE movie of Metaknight fighting along with the Ice Climbers. Maybe this means he isn't one of the main villains...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:04 pm
Nero-K Holy ******** christ I GOT AN UPDATE GUESS RIGHT! Haha nice job bud, and i'm off to bed at that g-night
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:08 pm
Ness' chances just went down...
Lucas' smash is the baseball bat. Though I can't place the aerial in Ness' moveset...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:09 pm
I like getting video updates. This was a pleaser.
Meta Knight teams up with the Ice Climbers. That should be interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:10 pm
the enemies fighting skills look awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:11 pm
Tatsuman In all honesty, it could have been.
But saying he's not included because of that statement isn't really valid. None the less, we will find out by Jan 24th.
Many "I told you so"s will be exchanged, regardless of Ness' inclusion or lack thereof. But then likewise, isn't it invalid to say that he's in because of the very same wording?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:13 pm
Meta_Fish Tatsuman In all honesty, it could have been.
But saying he's not included because of that statement isn't really valid. None the less, we will find out by Jan 24th.
Many "I told you so"s will be exchanged, regardless of Ness' inclusion or lack thereof. But then likewise, isn't it invalid to say that he's in because of the very same wording?
Yes.
But that's not why I think he's in. PK Starstorm is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:15 pm
Tatsuman Meta_Fish Tatsuman In all honesty, it could have been.
But saying he's not included because of that statement isn't really valid. None the less, we will find out by Jan 24th.
Many "I told you so"s will be exchanged, regardless of Ness' inclusion or lack thereof. But then likewise, isn't it invalid to say that he's in because of the very same wording?
Yes.
But that's not why I think he's in. PK Starstorm is.
And we think he's out because many of his attacks thus far are similar if not identical to Ness'. So really, he could be in, he could be out. We don't know, and we won't know for awhile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:16 pm
im having joygasm's over this video.
I want Brawl, and I want it NOW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:17 pm
Meta_Fish Tatsuman Meta_Fish Tatsuman In all honesty, it could have been.
But saying he's not included because of that statement isn't really valid. None the less, we will find out by Jan 24th.
Many "I told you so"s will be exchanged, regardless of Ness' inclusion or lack thereof. But then likewise, isn't it invalid to say that he's in because of the very same wording?
Yes.
But that's not why I think he's in. PK Starstorm is.
And we think he's out because many of his attacks thus far are similar if not identical to Ness'. So really, he could be in, he could be out. We don't know, and we won't know for awhile.
Yup.
Agreed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:18 pm
That was an amazing video.
The best part about the SE is the teaming of characters and how it works into a plot. I'm really looking forward to that mode. It's changing Smash as we know it. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
