|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:02 am
Nothing is completely harmless... ninja SO! How is Momma today? =D
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:48 pm
@Anya; I'm so making a banner for this guild that says that on it. o.O;
Jeeeez, I feel so LITTLE when I'm here. >.>;
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 2:51 pm
Monochrome Butterfly Nothing is completely harmless... ninja
What about Magikarp? I mean sure it has Tackle and Flail but really.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:37 pm
Did someone say...MAGIKARP!?! 
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:25 pm
Mikallen Did someone say...MAGIKARP!?!  Lawl. PWN'd.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:35 pm
Ky: Why you always gotsta be bringing me down homie?
Aire: Now how could I forget about all you guys, especially with the biggest thing to rock the world since sliced bread is to be borne soon?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 7:42 pm
Mikallen Did someone say...MAGIKARP!?!  Ash should be ashamed. After four leagues, the orange islands, and the battle frontier, shouldn't his Pikachu be the pokemon equivalent of Chuck Norris? What, does it get sea sick every time they move to a new location and lose all of it's power? Is he like freakin Samus (no offense to Samus, she is teh ultimate bad a** bounty hunter babe) who loses all her equipment at the start of every mission or simply doesn't have it, being forced to start from square one and find everything again? I mean, it's almost as stupid as the Samus analogy I just used! And...and...and...... is that a sandwich!? *disappears to eat brother's sandwich*
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:46 pm
Yeah, it's not like Ash is a frickin' loser tool with a lame a** Pikachu that bends the rules all the time with the power of love right?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 6:28 am
Mikallen Yeah, it's not like Ash is a frickin' loser tool with a lame a** Pikachu that bends the rules all the time with the power of love right? It's as simple as this: Ash haxxor'd. D:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 7:17 am
And there's your proof Mag. Glad I could be of service. :3
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 12:45 pm
Dude. That Magikarp kicked a**.
And I feel bad for Pikachu. The little pokemon works so hard, yet never seems to get any stronger. It's Ash's fault. He sucks at life. I mean, first he just sucks at training pokemon, and then they make his voice all crappy sounding?! The poor Pikachu has to endure all that. D:
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:51 am
Sir Upper Crust the 3rd Ky: Why you always gotsta be bringing me down homie? Cuz thats da way I roll, homez. cool
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:40 pm
Hey, don't be underestimating the power of love baby!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:34 pm
In math terms, if x^n < x^(love), where n = (type disadvantages), then n < love
If that's the case then let be bring this up:
<3 = love
n < love
n < 3
Damn, the power of type disadvantages is no stronger than a parabola! No wonder the anime always ignores them!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 4:03 am
Well of course, trying to plug that formula into a quadratic function that is co terminal with that of any complimentary set of coordinates that can be found on a unit circle would yield the same, or at least similar, results. But if you tried to put that into a reciprocating function, I'm not so sure anymore.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|