|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:40 am
Swordmaster Dragon Layra: Much awesomeness. Morberticus: Much non-awesomeness, I suppose. I can see how interacting extensively with math professors could be wearing on the body. I have to choose classes for next semester soon. I *know* I'm taking real analysis again, and I'm damn sure I want to take the grad course in relativity. I'm thinking of "Philosophy of Physics" as my BS humanities course, and I might wanna take the grad course in QFT. But there's also a class in low-dimensional topology, taught by my current seminar professor, and a class in low-dim topology and gauge theory taught by some big-wig. There's also a class in algebraic topology, if I didn't want to just teach myself and pretend I know something. There's too much maths and physics in the world. Why do so many of them have to be so bloody interesting? Strongly concurred. I really want to enroll in classes on QFT, real analysis, topology, stat mech, stochastic processes, bilinear forms, and mathematical physics. Unfortunately, I also want to be able to sleep and spend time with my girlfriend. >.< Grah!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 8:21 am
Morberticus Swordmaster Dragon Morberticus yar, I'm discussing my options with the maths dept tomorrow . I'd love to dabble in a bunch of modules but it's getting to the stage now where I need to actually start focusing on where I want to specifically lend my efforts in terms of research and whatnot. Since my undergrad degree is half experimental physics, people have been suggesting I focus primarily on mathematical modelling and computational physics, which I enjoy a lot. Wish me luck anyway. What are you now, a pirate? And does it count as wishing you luck if you command me to do it? I'm tired, and in a bit of a silly mood. Next week I get to lecture on homology groups and the Alexander invariant for knots to a bunch of peers who, while interested in topology, have no formal training in it, algebra, or knot theory. Fun! Heh... well I can't really offer specific advice on the topic, but I find that encouraging questions and avoiding powerpoint presentations are the keys. My most succesful talks are ones where I never touch a powerpoint slide (unless they're used for basic illustrations only) and keep the talk brief with considerable time allocated to Q+A. Had a talk with maths dept. I'm doing undergrad modules on group theory and point set topology, and postgrad modules in Algebraic topology and Functional analysis (The rest of my modules are physics modules, such as QFT, Research Project on Chaos theory, Solid State Physics etc..... matey. Oh, we don't get your fancy "technology". He, it's just good ol' blackboard for me. Though I've been making a couple of visual aids, which I think will help a lot. There are two key points in being able to construct this invariant: 1) Every knot/link has a Seifert surface, i.e. an oriented 2-manifold whose boundary is the knot/link; and 2) For basic manifolds, the first homology group is essentially the collection of loops in that manifold, with the equivalence (A + B)~C if there is some surface whose boundary is (A+B-C). (This becomes extremely formalized in algebraic topology, but I want to skip that part). So what I'm doing for visual aids is taking a knot (string) and making its Seifert surface out of wrapping paper. Then I'm using more string for loops in the ambient space, and showing the aforementioned equivalence by making more surfaces that attach the loops together. I think it'll help a lot, especially since I can't draw. Geodesic: Well, so far I'm signed up for classes in Real Analysis, GR, QFT, and philosophy of physics XD, with permission to sit in on grad and undergrad courses in algebraic topology, gauge theory and low-dim topology, and Riemannian geometry. What I do not have, as of yet, is a thesis advisor. I can has mathematical physicist who's not string theory or stat mech plz? Speaking of which...Layra (or anyone): Any good recommendations for classical mathematical physics books? Invariance under Lie groups, symplectic geometry, all that good stuff?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:02 am
Urg. Talk went horribly. I still don't have a job for summer. Finals are coming.
I'm gonna go crawl in a hole now.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 6:13 pm
I attended a creationist conference today.
Did you know the big bang was an explosion that came from nothing?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 31, 2008 12:50 am
Morberticus I attended a creationist conference today. Did you know the big bang was an explosion that came from nothing? *gasp*!! Fascinating. What was the density of this 'nothing'? Is it some exotic form of energy? rolleyes
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:57 am
geodesic42 Morberticus I attended a creationist conference today. Did you know the big bang was an explosion that came from nothing? *gasp*!! Fascinating. What was the density of this 'nothing'? Is it some exotic form of energy? rolleyes Keep your mumbo jumbo nonsensical, convoluted scientific concepts like "density" to yourself.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 4:36 pm
Morberticus geodesic42 Morberticus I attended a creationist conference today. Did you know the big bang was an explosion that came from nothing? *gasp*!! Fascinating. What was the density of this 'nothing'? Is it some exotic form of energy? rolleyes Keep your mumbo jumbo nonsensical, convoluted scientific concepts like "density" to yourself. You're absolutely right! How silly of me! I see it all clearly now: evolution is wrong because I'm clearly not an ape and the big bang is wrong because something doesn't come from nothing. Alleles are ficticious things invited by the devil to lead scientists astray and the cosmic background radiation was observed because the telescopes were always operated near a microwave while cooking lean pockets.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:13 am
I just remembered this earlier today and thought it was funny. It's a list of Chuck Norris-like facts about my favorite professor ever:
Peter Arnold has a black belt in physics. He powers his home with cold fusion. He's recited all the digits of pi twice. He once yelled the heat equation at a door and it melted. He can find a simultaneous position and momentum eigenstate. He coined the concept of an annihilation operator (inspired by his ability to annihilate anything...with his mind). He can find an analytic solution to the exact uranium Schrodinger equation. He can calculate nuclear binding energies for large nuclei by hand (normally done using computational lattice QCD). He's traveled outside his lightcone. He lives in an absolute reference frame. He can find components of the dynamical variables for a massive particle in Fourier space that aren't on the mass shell. In 1945 he recited the equations governing nuclear fission - this is how WWII ended. Finally, he leaves black holes in his wake because that much ambient awesomeness must necessarily collapse under its own field to form a singularity.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:29 am
Having been looking at SUSY-inspired mathematics for a while, I can't wait until some string theorist develops the idea of a supermodel.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:41 pm
I dread the day one does. I do not need to hear more puns on a day-to-day basis.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:34 pm
Layra-chan zz1000zz Layra-chan I has a job! I'll be working at the MathWorks over the summer! whee That is very nice. I have a great deal of respect for that company's work, and the company itself seems to be a good place to be. Do you know what you will be doing for them? GUI/demo design for the symbolic maths toolbox for MATLAB. Apparently their current setup is several years old, so I'll be updating it, as well as making it more classroom-friendly. Does your work extend to modifying SIMULINK?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 6:37 pm
geodesic42 I just remembered this earlier today and thought it was funny. It's a list of Chuck Norris-like facts about my favorite professor ever: Peter Arnold has a black belt in physics. He powers his home with cold fusion. He's recited all the digits of pi twice. He once yelled the heat equation at a door and it melted. He can find a simultaneous position and momentum eigenstate. He coined the concept of an annihilation operator (inspired by his ability to annihilate anything...with his mind). He can find an analytic solution to the exact uranium Schrodinger equation. He can calculate nuclear binding energies for large nuclei by hand (normally done using computational lattice QCD). He's traveled outside his lightcone. He lives in an absolute reference frame. He can find components of the dynamical variables for a massive particle in Fourier space that aren't on the mass shell. In 1945 he recited the equations governing nuclear fission - this is how WWII ended. Finally, he leaves black holes in his wake because that much ambient awesomeness must necessarily collapse under its own field to form a singularity. And counted to infinity..twice. And the chemical formula for Cyanide is CN, these are also Chuck Norris's Initials, and it is no coincidence.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:04 pm
Morberticus Layra-chan zz1000zz Layra-chan I has a job! I'll be working at the MathWorks over the summer! whee That is very nice. I have a great deal of respect for that company's work, and the company itself seems to be a good place to be. Do you know what you will be doing for them? GUI/demo design for the symbolic maths toolbox for MATLAB. Apparently their current setup is several years old, so I'll be updating it, as well as making it more classroom-friendly. Does your work extend to modifying SIMULINK? Nah, I haven't touched SIMULINK. I wish I did get to work with it; it looks awesome.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 2:58 pm
I have a fun math problem for everyone.
sinx/n=?
it's a rather silly answer, but it's entertaining. (at least I think so anyway.)
@Layra-chan: My calc. 3 class is going to be using MATLAB this semester; however the system is having some problems that my teacher hasn't worked out yet, do you think you could help with solving the problem if you knew what it was? I only ask 'cause my teacher will take forever about fixing it, so if there's something I could do about it I'd like to do it... Thanks -tiki
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:24 pm
Layra-chan Morberticus Layra-chan zz1000zz Layra-chan I has a job! I'll be working at the MathWorks over the summer! whee That is very nice. I have a great deal of respect for that company's work, and the company itself seems to be a good place to be. Do you know what you will be doing for them? GUI/demo design for the symbolic maths toolbox for MATLAB. Apparently their current setup is several years old, so I'll be updating it, as well as making it more classroom-friendly. Does your work extend to modifying SIMULINK? Nah, I haven't touched SIMULINK. I wish I did get to work with it; it looks awesome. Yar it's pretty nifty. Its interface reminds me of LabView. Though I've only briefly used it for the occasional mathematical physics project. Hoping to use it more come october. @tiki: By 'problem with the system' do you mean software/installation issues or some physical system/model?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|