|
|
|
|
|
MatthewStriker Vice Captain
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:12 pm
An ECW title? I don't know if that would basically be the same as the hardcore title.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:01 am
Do we really need more titles at the moment? I understand that there's a lot of people who would like title shots, but most title shots seem to be arbitrarily assigned.
*coughUStitleatwrestlemaniacough*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MatthewStriker Vice Captain
|
Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 10:24 am
I guess it's not totally necessary I just thought it would be kinda interesting since we're getting more ECW people in the guild nowadays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:51 pm
What about a World X Cup? Almost like a Survivor Series match, where the person who makes the most eliminations gets a title shot?
Nations like:
Canada
Mexico
US
UK
Japan
What does everyone think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:43 am
I think the guild should have a list of contenders for each title. Maybe the mods talk about it and make a list of the roster and divide up the people on the roster with title they can contend for, and you can change lists if you start winning more matches or are active a lot and talk to the mods, etc. Anybody else think that's good?
Ex.
WIF Champ: Kevin Nash
Contenders: Matt Striker
Sabu
Nova
Johnny Devine
U.S. Champ: Nova
Contenders: all of the WIF Title contenders and
Jeff Hardy
Matt Hardy
Shawn Michaels
etc.
I-C Champ: Jeff Hardy
Contenders: Same for U.S.
Harcore Contenders: Everybody
Tag: Any tag team
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 12:44 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:07 pm
Oh sorry, haha! Is it posted anywhere? or is it a Mod only list?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 5:08 pm
We have a war with another guild .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:52 pm
Um, that probably wouldn't work too well because our guild is exclusive to actual wrestlers, so it'd really limit other guilds. Unless we worked with Bucci's guild, but they seem to have plans of their own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 5:30 am
We et another world title , and mack the undisputed champ. Also to fight for it you need a Tournament to see who get a match with two me for the two titles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:23 pm
Josh_Stand_Alone We et another world title , and mack the undisputed champ. Also to fight for it you need a Tournament to see who get a match with two me for the two titles. We've tried to do tournaments before, but people take a while with matches. Also, Another title's an interesting idea, but I don't know if we have enough people to make it work, because title like the intercontinental title aren't that active.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:26 pm
Hey, i got an Idea. What about a stickied thread showing various records in the guild. Like most wins, or longest match, or longest title reign. mrgreen mrgreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 3:04 pm
Well.
We need activity pretty quickly. When sports organizations struggle, they change their rules to create more scoring or whatever...
How about we change the rules for now [and change them back when we get on out feet]...
We could make it quicker to finish a match now and get new members [which we need xD] interested in matches and all that.
A tournament would be a nice way to get the guild some match activity, but it was earlier stated we didn't have enough members or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 5:18 pm
John Bradshaw Layfield
Well.
We need activity pretty quickly. When sports organizations struggle, they change their rules to create more scoring or whatever...
How about we change the rules for now [and change them back when we get on out feet]...
We could make it quicker to finish a match now and get new members [which we need xD] interested in matches and all that.
A tournament would be a nice way to get the guild some match activity, but it was earlier stated we didn't have enough members or something.
Hm... Actually, tweaking the rules isn't a bad idea. What do you think would be a good page number for pins? 3? 4?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2008 6:12 pm
I like JBL idea's , start pins by 4 or 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
