|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 6:28 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:18 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:42 pm
Hersheyz Cocoa Toi Poooopie
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:05 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 2:27 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 3:26 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 4:20 pm
4laugh i figure a cute smile is that much better...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 12:03 am
No, wanna know why?
Rule #3-I always win.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 5:23 pm
you dont lose. a cute smile is just better. 4laugh heart see? but...i think you would have to refer to rule #4.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 8:09 pm
why... rule #4 (Even if you can prove beyond all doubt that I have lost, refer to rule #3) doesn't work, because it says "refer to rule #3"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 10:21 pm
but it still means, that even with all that snazzy doubt, you still lost. even if you say you win, and techincally, you did, you still had to have lost enough to refer to rule #4 in the first place.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2006 11:00 pm
Which is why it's #3 not #4, because I didn't lose at all, let alone enough to have to refer to #4
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 12:29 am
she has ya beat in all of this in my view. plus the fact that in the logical standard of checking items in a list, (in this case the rules) #3 would come before #4, therefore by the time the process checks rule 4 rule 3 would already have happened declareing that Sanity has already won.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my dog ate my sanity Crew
|
Posted: Sun May 07, 2006 1:32 pm
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|