|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:30 pm
PhantomoftheFox Erik wore exceedingly tight pants in the 2004 movie because Joel Schumacher is a dirty old man obsessed with the sex appeal of 'young people'. That's pretty much the blanket answer for every weird moment or disturbing costume in the movie; because Joel Schumacher is pervy. And what be cool? I just realized something! Didn't JS also direct Batman Forever/Batman & Robin?!? *ugh* Batsuit with nipples. Yeah, I see what you mean. xp
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:34 pm
Yeah, both. You can tell the start of his involvement by when they started the opening montages of body parts.
xD And if you look closely, there's also zipper in the buttcrack of the Batsuit. I was disturbed on so many levels when I noticed that.... both because I had noticed and because Schumacher had actually put it there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:19 pm
PhantomoftheFox Erik wore exceedingly tight pants in the 2004 movie because Joel Schumacher is a dirty old man obsessed with the sex appeal of 'young people'. That's pretty much the blanket answer for every weird moment or disturbing costume in the movie; because Joel Schumacher is pervy. And what be cool? Yes, those were VERY tight pants. But he DID look good. I just thought about knowing about the painting rip off and all that. PhantomoftheFox Yeah, both. You can tell the start of his involvement by when they started the opening montages of body parts. xD And if you look closely, there's also zipper in the buttcrack of the Batsuit. I was disturbed on so many levels when I noticed that.... both because I had noticed and because Schumacher had actually put it there. *shudders*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:23 pm
La Fantome de le opera PhantomoftheFox Erik wore exceedingly tight pants in the 2004 movie because Joel Schumacher is a dirty old man obsessed with the sex appeal of 'young people'. That's pretty much the blanket answer for every weird moment or disturbing costume in the movie; because Joel Schumacher is pervy. And what be cool? Yes, those were VERY tight pants. But he DID look good. I just thought about knowing about the painting rip off and all that. Uhm...I beg to differ. He looked rather...unattractive...and particularly gross in those pants. PhantomoftheFox Yeah, both. You can tell the start of his involvement by when they started the opening montages of body parts. xD And if you look closely, there's also zipper in the buttcrack of the Batsuit. I was disturbed on so many levels when I noticed that.... both because I had noticed and because Schumacher had actually put it there. I did not need to know about that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:16 pm
|You have just been punjabbed|
I want to burn my eyeballs out...But it would explain lots of stuff to me...There was another movie he directed, and I can't remember the freaking name...
|Have a nice day!|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:42 pm
welcometomyhell |You have just been punjabbed|
I want to burn my eyeballs out...But it would explain lots of stuff to me...There was another movie he directed, and I can't remember the freaking name...
|Have a nice day!| Well, you could check imdb, I suppose. Interestingly enough, when you Google 'Joel Schumacher', Batman & Robin comes up as the sub-link for imdb. That's sad. Really sad. xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 4:40 pm
Oh, Schmucky's done lots of movies. I think his best/most famous one was The Lost Boys. That was actually a really good movie. Once he got older and more famous though, he kinda turned into that creepy old man on Family Guy. You know the one.
*shudder*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:40 pm
PhantomoftheFox Oh, Schmucky's done lots of movies. I think his best/most famous one was The Lost Boys. That was actually a really good movie. Once he got older and more famous though, he kinda turned into that creepy old man on Family Guy. You know the one. *shudder* Hey paper boy, I've got popsicles in my basement!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:23 pm
*has just come home from drama club*
Ya, the whole batman thing creeps me out, and the popsickles, *shudders* I DO NOT even want to know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 4:26 pm
Erin Sovenya PhantomoftheFox Oh, Schmucky's done lots of movies. I think his best/most famous one was The Lost Boys. That was actually a really good movie. Once he got older and more famous though, he kinda turned into that creepy old man on Family Guy. You know the one. *shudder* Hey paper boy, I've got popsicles in my basement! oh dear god yes i know that one!!! "i've got some money in my pocket, why don't you reach in and grab it" me *screams, throws sandwich at the tv, and runs away*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 3:13 pm
Hannibal Lecter M.D. Nitemare Shadows But isn't the fact that Christene might want to have kids with Erik disturb ANY of you? I mean, no offence to Erik whatsoever, but if she wanted the kids to be REALLY good looking, wouldn't she have sex with Raoul?
Way One: If Erik's deformity is somehow genetic, then yes, she'd probably be better off going with Raoul. Why put another soul through what poor, unhappy Erik went through? Although, I don't believe there are many genetic deformities around (correct me if I am wrong.) But if it's not genetic, then the chances of another child being born as deformed as Erik is unlikely. I'm surprised Erik's mother didn't have a miscarriage or stillbirth, really (both of which are nature's way of.. disposing of a child who wasn't meant to be born, for whatever reason.).
But, Erik isn't a real person. Nor was his mother. So I guess you just have to accept what Gaston Leroux wrote. ^^;
Way Two: (This is referencing Susan Kay's Phantom, and assuming it is overall canon) Both Erik's mother and father were considered attractive, I believe. So Erik, had he not been born with the deformity, would probably have been good-looking. And his extroadinary talents would only add to his already attractive self. blaugh
Makes you wonder, huh? What could Erik have done to the world had he not been deformed?Mrs.Biscuits ShiralisDarkcaves Forget Christine, Erik should sleep with me! LOL, he should just sleep with all of us. xd The um...girls..that is..O.o|You have just been punjabbed|
Hannibal Lecter M.D.: ....First off, I'm going to pretend you didn't say Erik was not a real person.
Secondly, if it had been genetic, it would have been a recessive genetic disorder, and while the two recessives in Erik genes affected him, it would be highly unlikely that Christine would carry the same genes that would repeat the process, even more unlikely that it would repeat the recessive trait twice in a row.
If Erik had a disease, or the pregnancy was somehow botched and he lived, then there would be no problem having good looking children.
Mrs.Biscuits: Let the fanboys have some lovin', too!
And uh, sorry to burst the bubble, but if Erik were to be having this big whore-a-thon with all of us, wouldn't he die? I mean, he had a mental breakdown from kissing a girl on the forehead. .......Ummmm. Yeah....
|Have a nice day!|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:26 am
welcometomyhell Hannibal Lecter M.D. Nitemare Shadows But isn't the fact that Christene might want to have kids with Erik disturb ANY of you? I mean, no offence to Erik whatsoever, but if she wanted the kids to be REALLY good looking, wouldn't she have sex with Raoul?
Way One: If Erik's deformity is somehow genetic, then yes, she'd probably be better off going with Raoul. Why put another soul through what poor, unhappy Erik went through? Although, I don't believe there are many genetic deformities around (correct me if I am wrong.) But if it's not genetic, then the chances of another child being born as deformed as Erik is unlikely. I'm surprised Erik's mother didn't have a miscarriage or stillbirth, really (both of which are nature's way of.. disposing of a child who wasn't meant to be born, for whatever reason.).
But, Erik isn't a real person. Nor was his mother. So I guess you just have to accept what Gaston Leroux wrote. ^^;
Way Two: (This is referencing Susan Kay's Phantom, and assuming it is overall canon) Both Erik's mother and father were considered attractive, I believe. So Erik, had he not been born with the deformity, would probably have been good-looking. And his extroadinary talents would only add to his already attractive self. blaugh
Makes you wonder, huh? What could Erik have done to the world had he not been deformed?Mrs.Biscuits ShiralisDarkcaves Forget Christine, Erik should sleep with me! LOL, he should just sleep with all of us. xd The um...girls..that is..O.o|You have just been punjabbed|
Hannibal Lecter M.D.: ....First off, I'm going to pretend you didn't say Erik was not a real person.
Secondly, if it had been genetic, it would have been a recessive genetic disorder, and while the two recessives in Erik genes affected him, it would be highly unlikely that Christine would carry the same genes that would repeat the process, even more unlikely that it would repeat the recessive trait twice in a row.
If Erik had a disease, or the pregnancy was somehow botched and he lived, then there would be no problem having good looking children.
Mrs.Biscuits: Let the fanboys have some lovin', too!
And uh, sorry to burst the bubble, but if Erik were to be having this big whore-a-thon with all of us, wouldn't he die? I mean, he had a mental breakdown from kissing a girl on the forehead. .......Ummmm. Yeah....
|Have a nice day!| Danm, you've got a point...Still, if it is going on, I call first dibs! xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2006 5:20 pm
Not to mention the fact that even if Erik were real, he'd be dead by now.
Necrophilia =/= cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:43 am
|You have just been punjabbed|
I consider anybody who would consider having sex with Erik a necrophiliac (dead or alive.) He was a living corpse.
Most of the girls I know would still do it with Erik despite that. Hell, I would too.
|Have a nice day!|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2006 2:04 pm
Ya, REALLY dead. Still, I really don't look for appearence. Erik, on the inside seems to me to be a sweet, nice guy, and I'd do it with him regarless even if he was a living corpse. Ya, but I probably would too even if he's dead, which he probably is..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
