|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:21 pm
Oh bugger I might need to pm whoever handles Cursed Seals too.
Its still listed on my profile and I still have my Cursed Seal madeup slots - but the powers doesnt list me as the owner ; albiet no one else is listed as the owner so hopefully it won't be too difficult a matter to resolve =/
Who should I pm in regards to the Seal?
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:06 am
The ********.... I'm about to impale my computer. Stupid dickfaced computer is acting up. For no reason too >.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:10 am
I Dark Lotus I The ********.... I'm about to impale my computer. Stupid dickfaced computer is acting up. For no reason too >.< You could borrow my "threatening axe" to threaten your comp in line ^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:20 am
*goes to post for gold* hmm now I just need to wait until Hedoro will be on for an extended period of time..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:22 am
Mythic | Yeah well seeing as we don't want two people for one rpc or one rpc with more than one sword in the group due to it only being seven spots we couldn't put Soul Calibur among others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:33 am
Eh true, but the other Soul sword should have some place in it... and, it's not like the legendary swordsman isn't modifiable for the guild, I mean weve already increased the number of Saanin, adding a slot to fit it wouldn't be too hard. Though, I honestly expected Blutsauger to be in there lol. It just seemed like a good choice since the sword is unblockable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:37 am
OH and just one more bit of member input... I like the idea of the swords getting their own techs... buuttt you might want to throw a limit on there... either a max number, or increase the Cps required for them...since at the moment that will massively imbalance the guild power wise, since at 100k cps they get 10 extra made ups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:44 am
Mythos Maleficarum OH and just one more bit of member input... I like the idea of the swords getting their own techs... buuttt you might want to throw a limit on there... either a max number, or increase the Cps required for them...since at the moment that will massively imbalance the guild power wise, since at 100k cps they get 10 extra made ups I thought we just submitted them in the made-up forum, but they were normal, learnable techniques, available to any member of the group. So by being one of the Swordsmen, you'd have a solid 100 new techniques to learn, given time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:46 am
Quote: The techniques listed below are techniques for each sword. Each current wielder of one of the listed swords is responsible for creating techniques for their sword and submitting them into the Made Up topic for mod approval. The first sword move you can get as soon as you're a member. After that you can make a move every 10k. The way I'm reading that, is basically that being a wielder of one of the swords gives you an extra made up slot every 10k Cps. And, despite sounding like it would be a good idea, I don't see how you could learn each others moves since the techniques are supposed to have some attachment to the sword.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:48 am
Mythos Maleficarum Eh true, but the other Soul sword should have some place in it... and, it's not like the legendary swordsman isn't modifiable for the guild, I mean weve already increased the number of Saanin, adding a slot to fit it wouldn't be too hard. Though, I honestly expected Blutsauger to be in there lol. It just seemed like a good choice since the sword is unblockable. wtf are you talking about? its only 4 sanins...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:51 am
Hmm, when I read it, I thought it more like actually creating techniques for the group, like how the Akatsuki and The Cool have their own techniques. You do raise a good point about sword-specific techniques, though. We'd probably have to ask if we are making techniques purely for those blades, or for kenjutsu as a whole? Honestly, I can't see the members being given that many made-up slots just like that. Then again, that's kind of similar to being a member of Hidden Katana, I think? Rather than making an armload of swords with an extra made-up each, it's having one sword, with an armload of made-up slots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:53 am
Drago_the_Blackrose Mythos Maleficarum Eh true, but the other Soul sword should have some place in it... and, it's not like the legendary swordsman isn't modifiable for the guild, I mean weve already increased the number of Saanin, adding a slot to fit it wouldn't be too hard. Though, I honestly expected Blutsauger to be in there lol. It just seemed like a good choice since the sword is unblockable. wtf are you talking about? its only 4 sanins... I think that's my fault. Since there were originally three Sannin (Tsunade, Orochimaru, Jiraiya) and San from Sannin meant three, I mentioned the change in kanji which led to the name change. (As an added benefit, 'shi' also means death, which is why lots of counting uses the 'yon' instead. And since we had added one to the ranks of the Sannin, the same is theoretically possible for the Swordsmen. Especially since there's a lot more unique swords in our setting than the Narutoverse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:54 am
Blah BLah Blah. All i hear is mouth from you guys. i am the best no I am the Best...No I am the Best. I don't give a flying seagulls crap whose the best. Cause there are Four Spots and I only have too be better than a few of you people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 7:55 am
Hedoro Koutai Drago_the_Blackrose Mythos Maleficarum Eh true, but the other Soul sword should have some place in it... and, it's not like the legendary swordsman isn't modifiable for the guild, I mean weve already increased the number of Saanin, adding a slot to fit it wouldn't be too hard. Though, I honestly expected Blutsauger to be in there lol. It just seemed like a good choice since the sword is unblockable. wtf are you talking about? its only 4 sanins... I think that's my fault. Since there were originally three Sannin (Tsunade, Orochimaru, Jiraiya) and San from Sannin meant three, I mentioned the change in kanji which led to the name change. (As an added benefit, 'shi' also means death, which is why lots of counting uses the 'yon' instead. And since we had added one to the ranks of the Sannin, the same is theoretically possible for the Swordsmen. Especially since there's a lot more unique swords in our setting than the Narutoverse. Ah I see I see. It is only three sanins arn't there..were did I get four form lol lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 8:01 am
Mythic | I suppose it could be modified again. But I personally like it the way it is now. It's got as many of the swords shown in Naruto as we could fit without rpc or rper repeat. Sure the filler swords could be something more like the Blutsauger or even the Storm Bringer but the swords we chose are pretty intense too. The Kara Blade can alter the environment and even bend reality. The Soul Edge isn't as great but it can take whatever form the user wants and it gets stronger with each person killed. If you can convince some of the other mods to change the swords or maybe increase the number of swordsmen, then fine. But I sort of like it the way it is until someone takes down a swordsmen or the mods think up some way to have people fight for a spot with their sword of choice.
The moves aren't like Made Ups. That's just where they can get submitted for mod approval. They're organization techs.
Hedoro | Hm. I didn't think about the sharing part. I was thinking each member would get a technique unique only to their blade. Sharing would be interesting.
Drago | Hello dear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
