Mintaka
Yes, but the rules say:
- Only one pair
per person.
As in I can't post my first, then turn around and post another pair of breeding - the owner of the other Soquili would have to post. Otherwise when it comes to some breedings, a LOT of people are ******** out of a chance because they have a mate with someone who owns a lot of Soquili. But yet that person has
never had a breeding before ...? I wouldn't exactly say that's fair.
But seeing as the rules say one pair per person, and nto ONE SOQUILI per person on this raffle...
Also, I don't see where that couple was denied being allowed in. If ti was this raffle, you DID post a different pair earlier as I saw. And if Mialee tried to post both the one and that pair, then I could see why she'd be denied under these rules.
But ultimately it's Sirenz's call on that, but I believe it's supposed ot be one pair per person posting, no asking for two different couples yourself. If it SHOULD be one Soq/person, then the rule post needs changed I think.
The difference between what happened in my example of Randee & Unesdala and Couscous & Lilith is that that Unesdala is co-owned while Lilith is not.
Unesdala was entered under Naysha as the owner, not Mialee.
Lilith was entered under bran-chan and cannot be entered under as any other owner.
bran-chan had already entered the raffle with another pair before DLF entered Couscous and Lilith.
And its not one pair per person posting.
I wanted to enter Randee & Unesdala again (where Naysha and Mialee would not get baskets [which they agreed to] since they are already entering other pairs). However, I was told by Sirenz that would not be allowed.
If it were one pair per person posting, that situation would be acceptable as I would not have been involved in any other pairs.
The rules say, "One pair per person" not "One pair per person posting".
Reply
