|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:39 pm
diake to give a hint at what the pokemon is...it doesnt matter if you know the pokemon or not...it think this would be cool cuz then it would be more realistic...kinda like your tracking a pokemon well we could do that for stronger ones because they are harder to find and catch? as in you have to follow the tracks to them.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:40 pm
Rye Pyrite diake i have a suggestion even though im a moderator but i want some feedback on this...what if moderators put out paw prints before releasing a pokemon To show what the pokemon is? or do you have to guess the paw prints to get the pokemon? The pawprint idea is great, as Veekun.com offers a picture of every pokemons pawprint. But there would need to be an easier way to identify the pokemon than the pawprint as you would be researching for a LONG time. sweatdrop If you posted the pawprint, and a small piece of the name, I think that would prove to be quite efficient. 3nodding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:48 pm
Rye Pyrite diake to give a hint at what the pokemon is...it doesnt matter if you know the pokemon or not...it think this would be cool cuz then it would be more realistic...kinda like your tracking a pokemon well we could do that for stronger ones because they are harder to find and catch? as in you have to follow the tracks to them. for the legendary ones would be great cuz then they know something goods gonna happen...or we could make a trail for like burning plains to the frozen lake and if you follow the trail and post at the end the pokemon will show itself like we put the paw print and say it was headed for grassy fields then when they go there they would see the paw print heading towards burning plains and it could go on for awile until they hit the end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:50 pm
diake Rye Pyrite diake to give a hint at what the pokemon is...it doesnt matter if you know the pokemon or not...it think this would be cool cuz then it would be more realistic...kinda like your tracking a pokemon well we could do that for stronger ones because they are harder to find and catch? as in you have to follow the tracks to them. for the legendary ones would be great cuz then they know something goods gonna happen...or we could make a trail for like burning plains to the frozen lake and if you follow the trail and post at the end the pokemon will show itself like we put the paw print and say it was headed for grassy fields then when they go there they would see the paw print heading towards burning plains and it could go on for awile until they hit the end Yes, and they can be planted anywere leading to the spot of the pokemon. yeah that would make it really harder to find.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ToastyMarshmellow Captain
|
Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:56 pm
heh ^ ^ i love my mods and mombers discusing ideas biggrin i makes it feel like the guilds more alive or somthing >> well anyways.. great idea guys! now i need to go to bed >> night all xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:34 pm
ToastyMarshmellow heh ^ ^ i love my mods and mombers discusing ideas biggrin i makes it feel like the guilds more alive or somthing >> well anyways.. great idea guys! now i need to go to bed >> night all xD Lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:04 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:35 pm
Not to sound mean or anything....but i don't think it fair that mods get to abuse their power by letting pokemon appear whenevr they want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 3:56 pm
explain how pokemon are supposed to be released then...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:03 pm
diake explain how pokemon are supposed to be released then... I think he means release pokemon for themelves. Although I've not seen one moderator do that yet, but maybe he means no one release Pokemon when he is online? question EDITTTTT: I need to stop saying spawn, and say release. -___-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ToastyMarshmellow Captain
|
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 4:04 pm
if mods dont release pokemon how are members exposed to get pokemon?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:17 pm
Whe i say this..i mean it like I saw a mod make a kadabra appear and he battled and caught it......we can't just do that like they can.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:35 pm
Shardy1 Whe i say this..i mean it like I saw a mod make a kadabra appear and he battled and caught it......we can't just do that like they can. I'll be honest and tell you that I told him he could, only once. I have done that before with a caterpie, and his wasn't a kadabra, it was an abra. Besides, you see less moderators getting pokemon than normal members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:23 pm
Well yeah i mean how else are we exposed to get pokemon? I mean we let members catch the pokemon, and only if they dont catch it within 5-10 mins we go and catch them, so yeah xP
|
|
|
|
|
|
ToastyMarshmellow Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 7:26 pm
ToastyMarshmellow Well yeah i mean how else are we exposed to get pokemon? I mean we let members catch the pokemon, and only if they dont catch it within 5-10 mins we go and catch them, so yeah xP Woah i got permission too. xD It was an abra not an ".Kadabra"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
