Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Extended Discussion
Pro-Life and the Death Penalty Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 8 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:38 am


MiNdCaNdY
you don't get it. These people can't do anything because every chance they get they commit a crime because they have nothing left to lose. The only left to do is take their life away, and if we can't use that as leverage, we have nothing.

Really, the only thing i see in common with the abortion argument and the death penalty is that both pro-abortionists and those who are anti death penalty have the same tactics: Ignoring the truth in favor of something they are more comfortable with. Perhaps if it was legal for us to strip away all their rights and have them quite literally sit in a dark room with no outside contact and just get 3 meals through a slot in the door, your argument would have some weight, but legally we can't. Which is fine with me since all that's ever done is make people more insane then they already are. No, there is no effective alternative to the death penalty. If there is, i'd say go for it, but since there isn't, i support it.
You still have not explained why putting them away for life doing hard labor is not a valid alternative.

I am not the one denying truth. You are. You are insisting that the death penalty is the only way, but you don't explain why the alternative I give is not valid!

To me the threat of being forced into near slavery, having to break rocks day after day for the rest of my life, with forced medical care keeping me alive? That would be a lot scarier then a little injection and it's over. I don't know how you can think that it's worse to die then to live a long life of hard labor.

What I'm hearing is that your only argument is that the death penalty is a deterant (There's the word I was searching for); That people won't commit crimes that carry the death penalty for fear of the death penalty.

Your argument is flawed in many ways. For one, you say that these people have nothing left to lose. So for some, couldn't you say that losing their lives is a blessing? They've got nothing left to lose means, I assume, that they live criminal lives of fear and near poverty. They commit the highly illegal and, usually, highly dangerous crime of murder, because they've got nothing left to lose, and that includes their lives. If I were in their position, I would think that death would be a release.
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:44 am


You know what's ironic? Your argument that Pro-Choicers and Anti-Death-Penalty people "ignore the truth in favor of something they are more comfortable with" is the same one Pro-Choicers, and Anti-Death-Penalty-ers I might add, would level against you; For the Pro-Choicers, you'd rather ignore the fact that abortion's a hard decision, and that women who have abortions are in tough situations, just to "save de poow widdle bay-bees," and the Anti-Death-Penalty-ers would say that you are ignoring the fact that killing someone when you don't have to is wrong, because you are more comfortable with the idea that people who do these horrible things die.

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100

andyz cool

PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:59 pm


Quote:
Your argument is flawed in many ways. For one, you say that these people have nothing left to lose. So for some, couldn't you say that losing their lives is a blessing? They've got nothing left to lose means, I assume, that they live criminal lives of fear and near poverty. They commit the highly illegal and, usually, highly dangerous crime of murder, because they've got nothing left to lose, and that includes their lives. If I were in their position, I would think that death would be a release.


fine with me, then look at it as a release. I'd rather that then have someone taking jobs away from people who have done nothing wrong, or sucking my tax dollars away in prison for the rest of their lives. I shouldn't have to pay for their illegal activity. If they know the punishment for murder is death, and they do it anyway, they deserve what they get. I don't see how you can argue that.

And while abortion is a hard decision, it's the wrong one. It isn't fair to the innocent victims, and neither is sustaining the life of someone who isn't interested in correcting their behavior and getting back into the general population. I'm not more comfortable with someone dying for what they've done, because God knows i've done wrong things in my life, but if they show no signs of remourse and put no effort into correcting their behavior, then all they are is a leech on the system.
PostPosted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 7:30 pm


I'm honestly sorry to keep connecting this to abortion, but you make it very easy.

The more children born the more workers there are, but no more positions are created. Children cost money. Unwanted children are a leech upon their parents and, in the end, the system. To extend this, unwanted children could, theoretically, have a higher chance of becoming criminals and thus being sent to jail for various non-capital crimes, leeching even more off the system.

The reason I am against the death penalty in a modern world is that, from a non-religious perspective, no one deserves death.

Even if I am to accept that some people deserve death, who has the right to judge them deserving of death? Do you really have the right to say, "This person deserves to die, this person deserves to live?" The only being who has the right to deserve who lives and who dies is God. Or, if you don't believe in a god, no one deserves to choose who lives and who dies, because that places them in a god-like position.

Other reasons: It has been stated that the death penalty, with it's system of appeals, is actually more expensive than life in prison, partially because no one lives that long during a life sentence. I don't have the exact statistics anywhere (And this isn't a giant issue with me so I can't be bothered to look,) but that's what people said to me when I was Pro-Capital Punishment.

There are people on death row who repent. How do you like that? You commit a murder, go to jail, find God, repent of your wrongdoings... And you're put to death anyways. Sucks to be you, you don't get a chance to change. You've already been sentenced. You could be a completely new man who desires to go to starving countries and build villages, but you'll never get the chance because you've already been condemned.

There are people who have died and are later cleared of charges due to new evidence. It's not always possible to be absolutely certain that someone committed a murder, and yet people are still sentenced to death who didn't commit the crime.

The jobs the prisoners would receive would not be desirable ones. And besides, you wish that there were no murders ever, right? Well, in that situation, there would be even more workers because the people that the murderers kill would also be working. The solution to unemployment is creating new jobs, not killing off workers.

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100

divineseraph

PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:32 pm


i find it ironic that one could be against the death penalty, reserved for criminals convicted of the most horrible crimes, yet accept war as a proper means of negotiation.

in war, civilians die, and other less innocent men die. in the death penalty, only the less than innocent men die. and please don't say tht war is for protection, we are not protecting ourselves by sending troops to die in the middle east.


neither are right, there are ways around them. one is more evil than others, however, becuase innocents die en masse.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 4:51 pm


MiNdCaNdY
Quote:
Your argument is flawed in many ways. For one, you say that these people have nothing left to lose. So for some, couldn't you say that losing their lives is a blessing? They've got nothing left to lose means, I assume, that they live criminal lives of fear and near poverty. They commit the highly illegal and, usually, highly dangerous crime of murder, because they've got nothing left to lose, and that includes their lives. If I were in their position, I would think that death would be a release.


fine with me, then look at it as a release. I'd rather that then have someone taking jobs away from people who have done nothing wrong, or sucking my tax dollars away in prison for the rest of their lives. I shouldn't have to pay for their illegal activity. If they know the punishment for murder is death, and they do it anyway, they deserve what they get. I don't see how you can argue that.

And while abortion is a hard decision, it's the wrong one. It isn't fair to the innocent victims, and neither is sustaining the life of someone who isn't interested in correcting their behavior and getting back into the general population. I'm not more comfortable with someone dying for what they've done, because God knows i've done wrong things in my life, but if they show no signs of remourse and put no effort into correcting their behavior, then all they are is a leech on the system.


I agree with you. We shouldn't have to pay cause of their choices.

They knew it was wrong, they knew all the possible punishments for crimes and had a choice not to do it but they did, they deserve it. Murders arn't innocent victims and they had the choice to follow the law and they choosed to break it and risked the punishments.

Children are different then murders/criminals. Yes Children do cost money but they did nothing wrong to deserve death, most kids don't go killing other kids.

rweghrheh


I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 6:32 pm


divineseraph
i find it ironic that one could be against the death penalty, reserved for criminals convicted of the most horrible crimes, yet accept war as a proper means of negotiation.

in war, civilians die, and other less innocent men die. in the death penalty, only the less than innocent men die. and please don't say tht war is for protection, we are not protecting ourselves by sending troops to die in the middle east.


neither are right, there are ways around them. one is more evil than others, however, becuase innocents die en masse.
I find it ironic that you can support the death penalty, the killing of defenseless prisoners, more then the war in Iraq, eliminating a cruel dictator who killed people for looking at him slantwise or for being from the wrong part of the country. confused

We've had the argument about the war in Iraq. The citizens are collateral damage, we aren't going into Iraq with the purpose of killing civilians, it's an unfortunate accident. But with the death penalty, the whole purpose of the death penalty is to -end lives.- It doesn't matter whose lives. And this is differenct from killing enemy combatants in war, because the prisoners are unarmed. They are currently just about harmless, and they would not hurt another human being if we just put them away in a high security prison. We could even make them contribute to society by making them do hard labor. But we kill them anyways. Why?

@Sachiko: Yes, children are different from criminals. I'm not saying they aren't. But what right do you have to say who does and who does not deserve death?

Also, yes, they commit these crimes with the knowledge that they may get the death penalty. How does that make it right? That's like saying, "It's the current law, so it's right." It makes no sense. Kurds knew that being Kurdish might get them killed in Iraq, so does that mean that Saddam killing Kurds was okay? No.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 8:28 pm


I.Am
I'm honestly sorry to keep connecting this to abortion, but you make it very easy.

The more children born the more workers there are, but no more positions are created. Children cost money. Unwanted children are a leech upon their parents and, in the end, the system. To extend this, unwanted children could, theoretically, have a higher chance of becoming criminals and thus being sent to jail for various non-capital crimes, leeching even more off the system.

The reason I am against the death penalty in a modern world is that, from a non-religious perspective, no one deserves death.

Even if I am to accept that some people deserve death, who has the right to judge them deserving of death? Do you really have the right to say, "This person deserves to die, this person deserves to live?" The only being who has the right to deserve who lives and who dies is God. Or, if you don't believe in a god, no one deserves to choose who lives and who dies, because that places them in a god-like position.

Other reasons: It has been stated that the death penalty, with it's system of appeals, is actually more expensive than life in prison, partially because no one lives that long during a life sentence. I don't have the exact statistics anywhere (And this isn't a giant issue with me so I can't be bothered to look,) but that's what people said to me when I was Pro-Capital Punishment.

There are people on death row who repent. How do you like that? You commit a murder, go to jail, find God, repent of your wrongdoings... And you're put to death anyways. Sucks to be you, you don't get a chance to change. You've already been sentenced. You could be a completely new man who desires to go to starving countries and build villages, but you'll never get the chance because you've already been condemned.

There are people who have died and are later cleared of charges due to new evidence. It's not always possible to be absolutely certain that someone committed a murder, and yet people are still sentenced to death who didn't commit the crime.

The jobs the prisoners would receive would not be desirable ones. And besides, you wish that there were no murders ever, right? Well, in that situation, there would be even more workers because the people that the murderers kill would also be working. The solution to unemployment is creating new jobs, not killing off workers.


how many times do i have to tell you that i'm talking about people who don't WANT to change here? those who are leaches on the system and do not want to change their life. In EVERY example i've given and in every case i've said i think the death penalty should be used i made it very clear that i was talking about criminals who continue to exploit and abuse the system while in prison, rather then using the time to fix what's wrong with themselves.

*sigh*

also, yes i know it's more expensive to appeal / ect a death penalty case. That needs to change as well.

andyz cool


I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Fri Sep 29, 2006 11:52 pm


Oh no, you never said anything about wanting to change the system.

I'm arguing against the system regardless, but the only thing I have to argue against specifically is the system as it is.

And regardless, the fact that these prisoners have no intention of changing doesn't change anything about my argument. In the same way as you can call them a leech on the system, you can call children born to poor, unproductive homes, leeches on the system. Or children in the foster care system.

Also, how do you intend to make the appeals process cheaper? The whole purpose of the appeals process is to make sure that they are guilty before they're killed. If you want to remove appeals, that makes it more likely that the innocent will hang.
PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:24 am


i'm saying they are a danger to others and not worth the risk and expense of keeping them alive

and trust me, with all the video equipment and witnesses in a prison, it should definatly limit the need for so many appeals.

and how can you call someone with an excuse and a true need a leech? they are not in controll of the circumstances that brought them there. A criminal is a completely different situation because they are abusing a system designed to give them a chance at redemption. It's kind of like the abortion argument saying that makes it sound like a child 'invaded' it's mother and is an unwanted intruder in her belly, where as in reality, that child had no choice in the matter at all.

andyz cool


I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 1:16 pm


Does the intent really matter? You said that a reason they should be killed is that they are a drain on the system, a leech, because they give nothing back. True. But so are newborns. So are poor people, in many cases.

As for the top part, how are they a danger to anyone if they are placed behind bars? Maybe to each other? But if they were going to die anyways, who cares? At least our hands aren't bloodied. But I don't think many of them would have the means to kill others in jail; I haven't heard of many killers who use their bare hands these days. confused And with guards around, and skillful checks of their cell and their... Person, it'd be rather hard to create shivs, or whatever you call them.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:41 am


intent is EVERYTHING, especially when it comes to crime and the law. It's the difference between involentary manslaughter and first degree murder. In this case, it's the difference between being a monster and someone in an unfortunate situation. One i'm very glad our country will support and sustain as it says a lot about how generous our country is with the vast wealth it has, but the other is a complete detrament and waste.

Also, if you don't care about them killing eachother, maybe we should just leave them on a tightrope over a large cliff? that way we don't kill them. Or wait, i got a better idea: We could have gladiator matches between the inmates. That will keep our hands clean. I don't see how you can say letting them in violent and disturbing ways (such as one case i heard of where a man was literally assraped to death by inmates) kill eachother is ok, but killing them in a humane way is not.

Also, in prison, bare handed murder is VERY common, or at least using objects in the environment rather then making them yourself. Also, you'd be suprised just how driven these inmates are and how resoursefull they can be when it comes to making weapons.

andyz cool


I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:04 pm


MiNdCaNdY
intent is EVERYTHING, especially when it comes to crime and the law. It's the difference between involentary manslaughter and first degree murder. In this case, it's the difference between being a monster and someone in an unfortunate situation. One i'm very glad our country will support and sustain as it says a lot about how generous our country is with the vast wealth it has, but the other is a complete detrament and waste.
Intent doesn't matter when it comes to the nature of the punishment.

Quote:
Also, if you don't care about them killing eachother, maybe we should just leave them on a tightrope over a large cliff? that way we don't kill them. Or wait, i got a better idea: We could have gladiator matches between the inmates. That will keep our hands clean. I don't see how you can say letting them in violent and disturbing ways (such as one case i heard of where a man was literally assraped to death by inmates) kill eachother is ok, but killing them in a humane way is not.
At least then they have a chance to defend themselves.

And don't be ridiculous, I'm not saying that we should encourage them to kill each other. That seems more like something -you- would want, since you are clamoring for their death. I'm saying that, if someone should die in these prisons and we did what we could to prevent their death, what can you do? At least they had a fighting chance.

Quote:
Also, in prison, bare handed murder is VERY common, or at least using objects in the environment rather then making them yourself. Also, you'd be suprised just how driven these inmates are and how resoursefull they can be when it comes to making weapons.
They can make weapons, but can they keep them? I've watched programs about prison, and guards can be -very- thorough. Prisoners can go so far as to hide the weapons deep inside their asses, and the guards can still find and remove them.
PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:05 pm


And besides, with the plan I proposed, we aren't giving them much time to come up with this stuff. At least eight hours a day of hard labor, and guards at every corner.

I.Am
Captain

Quotable Tycoon

7,825 Points
  • Money Never Sleeps 200
  • Signature Look 250
  • Forum Regular 100

divineseraph

PostPosted: Mon Oct 02, 2006 5:11 pm


i don't support the death penalty, i support the hard labor system. make them produce something and help society rather than make them money pits or kill them
Reply
Extended Discussion

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 5 6 7 8 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum