|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:22 am
TIFA! wait i think shes taken poop ... I WANT TO BE A MOOGLE! CALLED MOGGLE!! YAAAY!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:27 pm
MiniMangaMinx TIFA! wait i think shes taken poop ... I WANT TO BE A MOOGLE! CALLED MOGGLE!! YAAAY! OK, in which game?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 9:31 am
I'll claim Gurdy from FFXII.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2008 8:54 am
I shall claimith Reks from FF12
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 7:12 pm
All right, Gurdy and Reks have been added to the list!
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:37 pm
Well all my fav characters seem to be clamied already so well i guess i would like to claim selphie from ff8
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 12:39 pm
If there ever gets any openings for rinoa or tiffa pls let me know id really love to claim them but for now i guess i claim slephie from ff8
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 30, 2008 1:14 pm
Re-read the rules and I say that I claim Rufus Shira from Dark001, who has shown activity last time in July 07, 2005. Seconded?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:10 am
SweetangelK: Sorry, but Selphie's taken too.
As for Rufus... Sorry, but I think it's fairest that if the person's still in the guild, he's still theirs.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:43 pm
Ravenwolf SweetangelK: Sorry, but Selphie's taken too. As for Rufus... Sorry, but I think it's fairest that if the person's still in the guild, he's still theirs. aww ok well r there any other female characters free?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 10:29 am
sweetangelK Ravenwolf SweetangelK: Sorry, but Selphie's taken too. As for Rufus... Sorry, but I think it's fairest that if the person's still in the guild, he's still theirs. aww ok well r there any other female characters free? There's plenty if you look here. Double-check to make sure they're not claimed even if they're on that list, though, in case there's a mistake on it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:48 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:40 am
Ravenwolf As for Rufus... Sorry, but I think it's fairest that if the person's still in the guild, he's still theirs. You are kidding, right? That person is still in guild, but he hasn't been on entire site for three years.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:31 am
Schutzhund Ravenwolf As for Rufus... Sorry, but I think it's fairest that if the person's still in the guild, he's still theirs. You are kidding, right? That person is still in guild, but he hasn't been on entire site for three years. I'm kind of in agreement with Schutzhund, 3 years is a long time, I'm amazed that the guild holds onto inactive member like this.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:01 pm
Schutzhund Ravenwolf As for Rufus... Sorry, but I think it's fairest that if the person's still in the guild, he's still theirs. You are kidding, right? That person is still in guild, but he hasn't been on entire site for three years. Well at first the claims were permanent, even if you did leave the guild. At least this way, people are reclaimable, but it still has some semblance of permanence. It wasn't meant that you can just switch them like trading cards. Besides, if there were a time limit for inactivity, where would you draw the line? People would always be begging to make an exception for someone who's not quite outside the time limit and whatnot... I just think it's better to have a clear-cut yes or no.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|