|
|
| Got secrets? |
|
|
| Total Votes : 263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:07 pm
Valheita Divine_Malevolence Valheita Divine_Malevolence And can ya say, without any doubt whatsoever, it's right? If you can, you're naive. Being sure of anything is impossible, and the more delicate the work, the more unreliable the results. Besides, the particle area wasn't even really relevant in the long run. It's unreliable for sure, but even if the measurements are perfect it really doesn't stunt the original point. I can say without a doubt that it is an accurate scientific representation, and you're a moron if you expect the universe to provide more. neutral Don't like that statement. The first part is cocky, the second part isn't. "It's perfect, there's nothing better." Need to add the "and if it isn't" to the middle there. I didn't say it was perfect. I said it was accurate. So, basically, it's most certainly imperfect, and there's nothing within the realm of possibility that could be better. Says nothing for the technique bar we're not competent enough to do more. Which is still more or less saying nothing.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:09 pm
Divine_Malevolence So, basically, it's most certainly imperfect, and there's nothing within the realm of possibility that could be better. Says nothing for the technique bar we're not competent enough to do more. Which is still more or less saying nothing. If you want to get philosophical, absolutely nothing we measure and observe is remotely accurate, as there's no way to prove it's not a figment of our imagination. It's scientifically accurate, meaning that there is reasonable cause to believe it is correct within bounds of scientific theory and logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:10 pm
Valheita Divine_Malevolence So, basically, it's most certainly imperfect, and there's nothing within the realm of possibility that could be better. Says nothing for the technique bar we're not competent enough to do more. Which is still more or less saying nothing. If you want to get philosophical, absolutely nothing we measure and observe is remotely accurate, as there's no way to prove it's not a figment of our imagination. It's scientifically accurate, meaning that there is reasonable cause to believe it is correct within bounds of scientific theory and logic. We should start on the Brain in a jar theory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:12 pm
CH0Z0 Valheita Divine_Malevolence So, basically, it's most certainly imperfect, and there's nothing within the realm of possibility that could be better. Says nothing for the technique bar we're not competent enough to do more. Which is still more or less saying nothing. If you want to get philosophical, absolutely nothing we measure and observe is remotely accurate, as there's no way to prove it's not a figment of our imagination. It's scientifically accurate, meaning that there is reasonable cause to believe it is correct within bounds of scientific theory and logic. We should start on the Brain in a jar theory. If you do, I'm going to run out of the room crying. I hate philosophy D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:15 pm
Valheita CH0Z0 Valheita Divine_Malevolence So, basically, it's most certainly imperfect, and there's nothing within the realm of possibility that could be better. Says nothing for the technique bar we're not competent enough to do more. Which is still more or less saying nothing. If you want to get philosophical, absolutely nothing we measure and observe is remotely accurate, as there's no way to prove it's not a figment of our imagination. It's scientifically accurate, meaning that there is reasonable cause to believe it is correct within bounds of scientific theory and logic. We should start on the Brain in a jar theory. If you do, I'm going to run out of the room crying. I hate philosophy D: I love philosophy xd but crying is bad, so I shall not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:17 pm
CH0Z0 Valheita CH0Z0 Valheita Divine_Malevolence So, basically, it's most certainly imperfect, and there's nothing within the realm of possibility that could be better. Says nothing for the technique bar we're not competent enough to do more. Which is still more or less saying nothing. If you want to get philosophical, absolutely nothing we measure and observe is remotely accurate, as there's no way to prove it's not a figment of our imagination. It's scientifically accurate, meaning that there is reasonable cause to believe it is correct within bounds of scientific theory and logic. We should start on the Brain in a jar theory. If you do, I'm going to run out of the room crying. I hate philosophy D: I love philosophy xd but crying is bad, so I shall not. ; ; Maybe I just had a bad philosophy teacher. He was... well, arrogant and wrong. Not about philosophy, I have no doubt he understood that well... he just didn't understand the science he was calling pseudo-science xd I saw the science lecturer considering correcting him in front of the class xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:22 pm
Okay Divine, stop acting like you're smarter than every other scientist on the planet and that you know these things because "they don't make sense."
You haven't studied any of these things in depth, and all you're doing is speculating.
Science never claims to be the truth.
It claims to be as accurate as possible representations.
Other dimensions, and particle physics operate on completely different laws, you can't just apply normal logic to them and say they must not be true.
Once again, you are not smarter than every other scientist ever, and like Val said, learn something about something before you make wild hypotheses over it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:32 pm
Ne'er claims to be truth.
Hrm.......
Hrm...............
So, basically, it's never been more than "You might be wrong."
Which also means "I might be right."
I doubt it's going to go any farther than that any time ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:37 pm
Let's forget about the argument and get...massages!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:38 pm
Kestin Sha Let's forget about the argument and get... massages! I'll settle for some crumpets :3 As for random text.. Put the text in an image and randomise that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:39 pm
Kestin Sha Let's forget about the argument and get... massages! If it's not some Asian girl who isn't tiny or a twig walking on my back, no. Because I figure that would be painful to some degree. I'll give a novice one any day to anybody that wouldn't make it awkward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:40 pm
Valheita Kestin Sha Let's forget about the argument and get... massages! I'll settle for some crumpets :3 As for random text.. Put the text in an image and randomise that? I thought about doing that once. But..... I don't want two randomizers in my signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:44 pm
Divine_Malevolence Ne'er claims to be truth. Hrm....... Hrm............... So, basically, it's never been more than "You might be wrong." Which also means "I might be right." I doubt it's going to go any farther than that any time ever. Look, that's your own post. See what you said? "Being sure of anything is impossible" And yeah, that's right, but it means that "being sure" of things like matter and gravity are impossible. But you'd have to be pretty stupid to say that matter and gravity didn't exist. Science doesn't say "You might be wrong." It says "We might be right, and this is about as good as we're going to get at the moment. This will be tested, and until proven wrong, or a better system comes along, we're sticking to it." Do you really think that your thoughts are unique? That scientists much smarter than you have never had those ideas before? That they haven't been tested and proven wrong? Yes, you can say that there are invisible monkeys in your room who watch you get naked, and you "might" be right, but in all likelihood you're just insane.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:48 pm
•·.·´¯`·.·• ♪ ♫ ♬ ♫ ♪ •·.·´¯`·.·•´ Now now... chill out you all. Divine, back off a bit. =/ You seem to be on a massive streak of pissing people off lately.  ----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 6:50 pm
Rayne Bloodstone •·.·´¯`·.·• ♪ ♫ ♬ ♫ ♪ •·.·´¯`·.·•´ Now now... chill out you all. Divine, back off a bit. =/ You seem to be on a massive streak of pissing people off lately. ---------------------------------- It's fun. <.<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
