|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:38 pm
Typhoon_Omi Apparently, they can:
-Go at the speed of light.
-Take away light and fire and totally negate any damage they can do.
-Never overload.
-Make tiny blue text appear in front of them.
Or, that's what I'm taking from my current match. XD You could have him explain that, and don't act until he does.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:39 pm
jdr_172000 You could have him explain that, and don't act until he does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:43 pm
It looks like you may have to wait until he logs on. I would like to hear this it sounds rather interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Nanoscopic technology CAN do a lot.. o-o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Brian Peppers, l33t CS:S hacker FTW! rofl
As for my opponents, I only have enough time to post that I'm gonna be busy for a bit working on a huge community service activity. So...yea >_>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Well, none of my opponents like posting. xD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:47 pm
XShilonX Well, none of my opponents like posting. xD That is somewhat good I guess? But I would see why it would be rather disapointing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:51 pm
If you want to think realisticly then nanobots are one of the most idiotic ideas out there. With the only areas they are most suitable for being medical and computers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:53 pm
Typhoon_Omi jdr_172000 Why do I have a feeling that Epsilon is a pokemon in the Barton branch. Hahaha, hell no. I wouldn't stoop that low. Epsilon is an Elitist robot developed to test out two pieces of research for my company on another forum. It's full name is Robotic Assassin Version VIII Beta, Project: Epsilon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 1:57 pm
Thanks for telling us, and sorry for thinking that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:12 pm
OKAY!!!! One battle's off the ground!
The other two... Nyeeeeeh...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:14 pm
Nihilistic, that's actually what I was thinking initially; until I get a little explanation from Kuro on certain matters, I'm not replying lest' the situation turns more ill-off. =P
And GK, interesting. Though - give us credit, the fear of facing a Pokemon isn't all that outlandish in this tournament, what with the Cookeh' Monster and all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:14 pm
GOD! Crawley got DAMN lucky.
He didn;t even have to post, his opponent forfeited for no reason whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:15 pm
Typhoon_Omi I just got everything I did negated by 'nanobots' I'm going to go out on a limb and assume you're fighting Akira/Akemi Mercuraki? @ GK: I'm so very tempted to make IC comments about Punkbuster, or ask Clash to change the thread to a poll that says 'Votekick Peppers Yes/No?'. Mmm... FPS jokes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 2:20 pm
Omi, you want to know the best way to take care of a nanobot swarm. Light breeze, their so ******** small that getting blown off course is a death sentence to them. Nail him on energy and propulsion, fuel and the like. Even a simple electrical field would fry most of the bots as their too ******** small to harden.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
