|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:10 pm
Agreed. It probably was Draken.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:47 pm
Masamune 5.0 That is unless the Feral chose not to attack as to draw us into a sense of safety. Though it probably was Draken. It's most likely draken because the feral struck every day (not including day 1 because feral can't strike on day 1). Let's hope it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:59 pm
Panda_Sama Panda_Sama Hope I'm not too late to post my theory xd (I just woke up lol). After analysing day 2's kills, I have arrived at a probable theory. The feral wolf could be a player who's just abusing their powers to kill random players- since teleghost never posted once in this thread. The random kills may not appear strange at all since the goal of the feral is to remove every single player, but it seems to me that the feral is someone who doesn't participate much. On another note, Michailia your infrequent posting and agreeing with the crowd strikes me suspicious. Before when I-Mihn posted her reasons as to why Koosei could have been a wolf, you suddenly appeared to agree with I-Mihn and vote for Koosei. Michailia on pg 41 I, too, vote for Koosei. Sorry, but it's only a game, remember that. And now you're doing it again, suddenly appearing to agree with FS that Draken is the Feral. Michailia on pg 54 I've read the evidence carefully. I will vote for Draken. Sorry, but, the evidence weighs very heavily against you. From what I see, you're posting infrequently, but still posting to try and seem like an outsider to throw suspicion off yourself, but also trying to contribute to the votes. This makes me believe that you have a role of some sort. I'm bringing up my post to make a point. After reviewing all the pages I missed, another conversation between Michaila and Sauvie made the suspicion of Michaila being a wolf grow. Michailia Sauvie Michailia Grr.
Why the HELL did you guys kill Forsaken?
He. Was. My. Alliance. Member.
I can't trust anyone else now. He was a wolf in wolves clothing thats why we killed him No, he wasn't. He was a townie.
Besides, I trusted him, and I'm not dead yet. How could she be certain that FS was a 'townie'? For what I know, she can very well be a wolf too. Bringing post up for reference and further discussion. :]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:12 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:55 am
I'm alive? I'm alive! blaugh crying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:30 am
Masamune 5.0 Well, the Feral didn't strike so I guess that means Draken was the Feral. Either that or he just didn't make a kill. Either way to bad for Draken...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:36 am
Waynebrizzle Draken, the seer told me. >__> I place my own vote along with Drakens on Draken. Making it SUPERDRAKENTIMES2VOTE. LOL Draken voted for himself! rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:57 am
Panda_Sama Panda_Sama Panda_Sama Hope I'm not too late to post my theory xd (I just woke up lol). After analysing day 2's kills, I have arrived at a probable theory. The feral wolf could be a player who's just abusing their powers to kill random players- since teleghost never posted once in this thread. The random kills may not appear strange at all since the goal of the feral is to remove every single player, but it seems to me that the feral is someone who doesn't participate much. On another note, Michailia your infrequent posting and agreeing with the crowd strikes me suspicious. Before when I-Mihn posted her reasons as to why Koosei could have been a wolf, you suddenly appeared to agree with I-Mihn and vote for Koosei. Michailia on pg 41 I, too, vote for Koosei. Sorry, but it's only a game, remember that. And now you're doing it again, suddenly appearing to agree with FS that Draken is the Feral. Michailia on pg 54 I've read the evidence carefully. I will vote for Draken. Sorry, but, the evidence weighs very heavily against you. From what I see, you're posting infrequently, but still posting to try and seem like an outsider to throw suspicion off yourself, but also trying to contribute to the votes. This makes me believe that you have a role of some sort. I'm bringing up my post to make a point. After reviewing all the pages I missed, another conversation between Michaila and Sauvie made the suspicion of Michaila being a wolf grow. Michailia Sauvie Michailia Grr.
Why the HELL did you guys kill Forsaken?
He. Was. My. Alliance. Member.
I can't trust anyone else now. He was a wolf in wolves clothing thats why we killed him No, he wasn't. He was a townie.
Besides, I trusted him, and I'm not dead yet. How could she be certain that FS was a 'townie'? For what I know, she can very well be a wolf too. Bringing post up for reference and further discussion. :] I actually trusted him, and he told me right off the bat he was a normal townie. He also pmed me the day it started, and I even told him something I shouldn't have told.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 pm
And my infrequent posting is due to taking my flu medicine, and playing Zelda, and not having anything to contribute. Besides, I don't trust anyone here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:42 pm
I'm 80% sure it was Draken, 20% sure that the feral was unbelievably smart and manipulated us to kill Draken and then didn't strike tonight. But it probably was Draken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:10 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:32 pm
IT'S YOU!!! Nope, not really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:25 pm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:43 pm
Michailia Panda_Sama Panda_Sama Panda_Sama Hope I'm not too late to post my theory xd (I just woke up lol). After analysing day 2's kills, I have arrived at a probable theory. The feral wolf could be a player who's just abusing their powers to kill random players- since teleghost never posted once in this thread. The random kills may not appear strange at all since the goal of the feral is to remove every single player, but it seems to me that the feral is someone who doesn't participate much. On another note, Michailia your infrequent posting and agreeing with the crowd strikes me suspicious. Before when I-Mihn posted her reasons as to why Koosei could have been a wolf, you suddenly appeared to agree with I-Mihn and vote for Koosei. Michailia on pg 41 I, too, vote for Koosei. Sorry, but it's only a game, remember that. And now you're doing it again, suddenly appearing to agree with FS that Draken is the Feral. Michailia on pg 54 I've read the evidence carefully. I will vote for Draken. Sorry, but, the evidence weighs very heavily against you. From what I see, you're posting infrequently, but still posting to try and seem like an outsider to throw suspicion off yourself, but also trying to contribute to the votes. This makes me believe that you have a role of some sort. I'm bringing up my post to make a point. After reviewing all the pages I missed, another conversation between Michaila and Sauvie made the suspicion of Michaila being a wolf grow. Michailia Sauvie He was a wolf in wolves clothing thats why we killed him No, he wasn't. He was a townie.
Besides, I trusted him, and I'm not dead yet. How could she be certain that FS was a 'townie'? For what I know, she can very well be a wolf too. Bringing post up for reference and further discussion. :] I actually trusted him, and he told me right off the bat he was a normal townie. He also pmed me the day it started, and I even told him something I shouldn't have told. Hmm, something strikes me as strange. FS, being a careful player wouldn't just choose someone off the list to pm and tell them that he was a townie without first making sure that they were a townie too. Unless of course, he was the seer or insane seer, in this case he would/or supposed to have scried at least 3 other players. Other than that, he couldn't have been certain that he was forming an alliance with another townie. Wolves on the hand, start the game off knowing who the other wolves are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:51 pm
Michailia And my infrequent posting is due to taking my flu medicine, and playing Zelda, and not having anything to contribute. Besides, I don't trust anyone here. and to add, if he was either the seer or the insane seer and you were in an alliance, he could have given you news on the roles of the players that he did scry. Then you would have players that you do trust. But since you don't, does this mean FS wasn't the insane seer/seer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
