|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:39 am
Pen and paper.
Like D&D, Vampire: The Masquerade, or the tabletop games made for universe like 40k.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:42 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:47 am
As far as MMO's go, the only ones I've been playing are DFO and...obviously...WoW.
I really wish DFO wasn't a free game. Maybe then people could get basic stuff for a flat rate instead of what they do now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:02 am
Mmm... late night all you can eat sushi and bubble tea. Time to pass out for like, eight hours as soon as I finish this bubble tea since I dont got work tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:08 am
Now, after wiki-ing what a bubble tea is...I want one. ._.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:10 am
I'm in an entire guild that makes PnP games work, though mostly they use an entire subforum per game. Does a lot of D&D 3.5 and 4.0, plus a handful of other games. Most of them move slowy (but not half so slowly as our RP tends to), largely it seems because players vanish and are unable to post anything for weeks at a time or just quit because they lose interest, or general cases of "this guy only checks the guild once a week unless he's told to, and none of us have his IMs, and only one of us likes to randomly PM people".
'course, real time pnp just feels nicer than by post. Makes it easier to handle the responding as things go. D&D just flows better at a table than structured by post. Don't get me wrong, they make it work, but...
There's that gametable thing Ryugi found too, but I doubt we'll use it.
Because honestly. Someone would have to want to GM and then we'd have to pick a regularly scheduled time to play, which we've sorta proven this group can't do. Even if we could, it'd be giving up vidja time for that, and there's always at least one person who needs to get some vidja and will abandon anything else going on and get into some on their lonesome. Not that I haven't been guilty of that when I find a good single player game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 1:28 am
If you're asking "is it possible to do", it is. Fish is doing it right now. You cannot kill Khavaki.
If you're asking why nobody's doing it, I can't tell you. We've been trying to make it happen for years and nobody ever seems to want to take the steps beyond saying "we should".
If you think people will stop posting or not post for weeks... don't invite Cog.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:52 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:39 am
Back reading was boring. *goes to find something else to do.*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:44 am
Front reading is where it's at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:54 am
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 6:57 am
Not exactly, but why not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:35 am
Man, catching pokemon is hard.
Keep exploding things in what I can only interpret as a shower of gore on the first hit. I guess that's what I get for picking some little crocodile thing with a move called "rage".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:42 am
crocodill?
The trick is to go after stronger creatures, so they don't die so easily xp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:58 am
Cyndaquil is where it's at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
