Welcome to Gaia! ::

Why would we need science to demonstrate objective history?
Speak for yourself Oathbreaker.

What makes you think that who you are online is not the same as who you are offline? Why build in the false dichotomy?

If you're a liar and an oathbreaker on the internet, you're such as an individual.
Opinions are not sacred, and some of them are wrong.
It's actually easier for a lot of us. That's why we do it.


Demonstrate which kindrend you belong to.
Demonstrate that you have undergone the rites, that you have fulfilled the cultural conditions.

What of the others?

What do you mean? I asked why are you ignorant of the feminine form, instead suggesting that Volva is synonymous as the feminine counterpart to the Godhi.


In the Eddas, she fulfills a different role than that of the Godhi. The Gyðja are the feminine counterpart, while the Völva have removed themselves from their social obligations, often traveling and not being tied to a hof.

We can prove that there are other magical systems. There is documentation in the Eddas. I can't fathom how someone who supposedly serves the AEsir is more ignorant of this stuff than I am.

Explain it to us. Why the ******** do I know more about the religion you are a Priest in than you do?

What aspect of genetics suggests it is impossible for you to misrepresent their culture?

I want the haplogroup.

You are when you claim that seiðr is the only magic amongst the Norse.

Chapter and verse.

Show us where. Your word isn't good enough.


He is Odin's Blood Brother, as mentioned in the Flyting of Loki, but that isn't the same as proving that they are brothers as Vili and Ve are to Odin.

Further- what makes you think that Joten means Giant and is not just another tribe of gods the way the Vanir are?

Which translation do you recommend and on what pages do you find the statement that Loki was born with the knowledge to shapeshift?

I demonstrated one easily shown error in your position. That seiðr is the only form of magic.

Your response above shows that.

Clearly your response to the nature of the role of the Godhi is to suggest that "Their [sic] has to be someone to teach..."
He explained the difference between herd behavior and awareness. That doesn't make him a hypocrite. Further- by your own reasoning, he did what pleased him in writing his books, which would suggest he followed his own words.


The burden of proof is on you. I don't have to disprove your claims.

Evocations. Not Invocations.

Wiccan is two gods which is polytheism. Now their are differences in wicca, that it is not all the same thing. I am not wiccan but from what I was told a varation of wicca is greek. If not then why can it not be greek, if you pick your own god and goddess. I dont know wicca so I'm only going off of what i know from my friends.

Oh! That might be one of the reasons you're having a hard time feeling fulfilled by it. Wicca: A Guide, is only about a third of the core material for Standing Stone.

The other third is outlined in Living Wicca and found through introspection.

He is an pioneer and a great person. No one can take that away from him.
I do find it interesting how in the 19th century people joined the Golden Dawn and did the *ciances* dont know how to spell it.

O.o; Oh. That would explain my difficulty in details. Thank you much. I hadn't thought to see whether his other books contained any further info... I kind of assumed that because the other ones I had didn't contain any further material, that the ones I didn't have, wouldn't either.

In retrospect, it was a silly thing to overlook.

Eh, it happens. It sounds to me as though she bought into the misconceptions of Wicca and applied them where they didn't belong. Being from Greece wouldn't preclude her from the mistake.

Pick it up. You might find what you're looking for. As long as you don't confuse Standing Stone for Wica, I see no harm in it.