Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply Philosophers Anonymous
What makes the species of Man so special? Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Reagahn

Original Lunatic

PostPosted: Wed May 24, 2006 4:10 pm


"I've never seen a wild thing sorry for itself."

Humans are capable of bringing about their own mental or physical demise. Animals have no concept of suicide, so appreciate life more readily.

Maybe. I'll ask my cat.
PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 12:30 am


Invictus_88
vorel_vargach
Invictus_88

vorel_vargach
1. Humans are a type of animal.

2. Humans are as far as we can tell the smartest living things that exist.

3. Being the smartest does not make us the best.

4. Power does not nessasaraly imply responsibility or rights.


How does it not make us the best? We can do everything they can do, and more.

Why does power not necessarily involve responsibilities?


We can not do everything that the animals of the world can do.

How does power necessarily involve responsibilities.

It is not the place of the most powerfull to decide how,when and where the week shall die.


Can't we? Name something. Try and find an animal that we are not greater than.

Power gives control. Necessarily. Control gives responsibility. Necessarily.

No, it isn't. It is the place of the most intelligent.


I disagree. Because you are quote on quote "intelligent" does not give you the right to decide how something weaker that you shall die. Being stronger means protecting the weak. Not destroying them just for the sake of doing so. Which by the way, it is a common belief that we are NOT the most intelligent race on the planet. So would you like to leave our fate up to the dolphins perhaps?

Socrates in Disguise
Captain


Starlock

PostPosted: Thu May 25, 2006 7:13 am


Most intelligent? Woah... back up a second here. How, precisely, are we measuring intelligence? There are many kinds of intelligence, and on some measures, nonhuman animals are vastly outdo us. And, of course, because we demand that they measure up to our own artificially constructed standards of intelligence, any test is going to be biased, most often in our own favor.
PostPosted: Fri May 26, 2006 9:37 pm


Indeed. I agree. That is why intelligence should not be the basis of anything invloveing other races besides our own let alone death. There must be equality in nature not unjust domination.

Socrates in Disguise
Captain


Invictus_88

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2006 10:51 am


Socrates in Disguise
Invictus_88
vorel_vargach
Invictus_88

vorel_vargach
1. Humans are a type of animal.

2. Humans are as far as we can tell the smartest living things that exist.

3. Being the smartest does not make us the best.

4. Power does not nessasaraly imply responsibility or rights.


How does it not make us the best? We can do everything they can do, and more.

Why does power not necessarily involve responsibilities?


We can not do everything that the animals of the world can do.

How does power necessarily involve responsibilities.

It is not the place of the most powerfull to decide how,when and where the week shall die.


Can't we? Name something. Try and find an animal that we are not greater than.

Power gives control. Necessarily. Control gives responsibility. Necessarily.

No, it isn't. It is the place of the most intelligent.


I disagree. Because you are quote on quote "intelligent" does not give you the right to decide how something weaker that you shall die. Being stronger means protecting the weak. Not destroying them just for the sake of doing so. Which by the way, it is a common belief that we are NOT the most intelligent race on the planet. So would you like to leave our fate up to the dolphins perhaps?


Yes it does, because it makes you the person most capable of deciding. If you are most capable, you should fulfil those capabilities.

No. More accurately - being stronger gives you the ability to do as you wish. Intelligence lets to discern what it best to do with your strenth. Humans have both, greatest cognition and greatest power.

We cannot resign our fate to anything but ourselves.

We are self-determined.
PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2006 10:56 am


Starlock
Most intelligent? Woah... back up a second here. How, precisely, are we measuring intelligence? There are many kinds of intelligence, and on some measures, nonhuman animals are vastly outdo us. And, of course, because we demand that they measure up to our own artificially constructed standards of intelligence, any test is going to be biased, most often in our own favor.


Well, we're bright enough for self-doubt too? Snazzy. Another point for team humanity.

As for bias. That's a good point. However, until another species evolves a sufficiently sophisticated brain to first comprehend abstract concepts like 'intelligence', 'value' and 'bias', and then formulate an alternative and nonhuman means for testing - we have no choice but to accept that we are the most intelligent and able beings on this planet.

Invictus_88


Bromisto

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2006 11:52 pm


Nothing is special of the human race. We are greedy and selfish. We think of only ourselves and no one else. We gained intelligence by luck of the draw, in my opinion anyway. We constantly kill our own species and sometimes we take our own life. We are the only animal that uses sex for pleasure. We depend on material objects like if we don't have them we will die. The only noble thing a human is able to do is gives its life for another without thought. But nobility has nothing to do with the human race being special. What I am basically trying to say is that there is nothing redeaming about us.
PostPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:19 am


Bromisto
Nothing is special of the human race. We are greedy and selfish. We think of only ourselves and no one else. We gained intelligence by luck of the draw, in my opinion anyway. We constantly kill our own species and sometimes we take our own life. We are the only animal that uses sex for pleasure. We depend on material objects like if we don't have them we will die. The only noble thing a human is able to do is gives its life for another without thought. But nobility has nothing to do with the human race being special. What I am basically trying to say is that there is nothing redeaming about us.


All intelligent animals kill other animals, only people are complex and intelligent enough to choose to kill themselves.

We do not depend upon material objects, we create them. Something that other cretures can only do in a comparatively basic way. Would you condemn birds for dying if they didn't have nests?

Apes use sex for pleasure as do dolphins. Anyway, what the devil is wrong with sex for pleasure?

Invictus_88


Bromisto

PostPosted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 2:40 pm


Invictus_88
Bromisto
Nothing is special of the human race. We are greedy and selfish. We think of only ourselves and no one else. We gained intelligence by luck of the draw, in my opinion anyway. We constantly kill our own species and sometimes we take our own life. We are the only animal that uses sex for pleasure. We depend on material objects like if we don't have them we will die. The only noble thing a human is able to do is gives its life for another without thought. But nobility has nothing to do with the human race being special. What I am basically trying to say is that there is nothing redeaming about us.


All intelligent animals kill other animals, only people are complex and intelligent enough to choose to kill themselves.

We do not depend upon material objects, we create them. Something that other cretures can only do in a comparatively basic way. Would you condemn birds for dying if they didn't have nests?

Apes use sex for pleasure as do dolphins. Anyway, what the devil is wrong with sex for pleasure?


What I meant is that an ipod is not a neccessity, nor is the latest game system. When a person can do something that is actually productive. For example, In your entire life would you actually need a pet rock. Yes that was not made by man but decided to put a lable on it making it a "neccissary" possesion. Or an eraser cap. Please tell you would actually use those. And nest for a bird is neccissary because it is its home.
I actually didn't know that other animals used sex for pleasure. I never ment to make it sound like that there was a problem with it but in my opinion it just makes us seem more animal like.
PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:30 am


Invictus_88
Starlock
Most intelligent? Woah... back up a second here. How, precisely, are we measuring intelligence? There are many kinds of intelligence, and on some measures, nonhuman animals are vastly outdo us. And, of course, because we demand that they measure up to our own artificially constructed standards of intelligence, any test is going to be biased, most often in our own favor.


Well, we're bright enough for self-doubt too? Snazzy. Another point for team humanity.

As for bias. That's a good point. However, until another species evolves a sufficiently sophisticated brain to first comprehend abstract concepts like 'intelligence', 'value' and 'bias', and then formulate an alternative and nonhuman means for testing - we have no choice but to accept that we are the most intelligent and able beings on this planet.


Hmm... we can't know in some ways if they're 'sophisticated' enough to comprehend these things. We have no way at this time of communicating with them effectively. If there is no basis for common communication, it is difficult to draw any conclusions. The same thing used to occur between radically different human cultures. The one might make assumptions about the other simply because they didn't speak the same language. So we do have a choice... we don't have to accept anything. We can choose to abstain on the basis of lack of conclusive evidence.

Starlock


Socrates in Disguise
Captain

PostPosted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 12:29 am


Invictus_88
Bromisto
Nothing is special of the human race. We are greedy and selfish. We think of only ourselves and no one else. We gained intelligence by luck of the draw, in my opinion anyway. We constantly kill our own species and sometimes we take our own life. We are the only animal that uses sex for pleasure. We depend on material objects like if we don't have them we will die. The only noble thing a human is able to do is gives its life for another without thought. But nobility has nothing to do with the human race being special. What I am basically trying to say is that there is nothing redeaming about us.


All intelligent animals kill other animals, only people are complex and intelligent enough to choose to kill themselves.

We do not depend upon material objects, we create them. Something that other cretures can only do in a comparatively basic way. Would you condemn birds for dying if they didn't have nests?

Apes use sex for pleasure as do dolphins. Anyway, what the devil is wrong with sex for pleasure?


~HOLD ON! Take it back 40 steps sir, did you just say that suicide is intelligent!? That makes absolutely no sense. We are very complex and illogical beings yes, but the fact that we kill ourselves and others in no way makes us intelligent. That would make the US Marines "smart" and then i couldn't use the acronym "Muscles are required, intelligence not essential" to make fun of them. Which by the way, we are not the only species capable of suicide, ever heard of a lemming? They do it all the time. Are they intelligent? HELL NO!

Starlock
Invictus_88
Starlock

Most intelligent? Woah... back up a second here. How, precisely, are we measuring intelligence? There are many kinds of intelligence, and on some measures, nonhuman animals are vastly outdo us. And, of course, because we demand that they measure up to our own artificially constructed standards of intelligence, any test is going to be biased, most often in our own favor.



Well, we're bright enough for self-doubt too? Snazzy. Another point for team humanity.

As for bias. That's a good point. However, until another species evolves a sufficiently sophisticated brain to first comprehend abstract concepts like 'intelligence', 'value' and 'bias', and then formulate an alternative and nonhuman means for testing - we have no choice but to accept that we are the most intelligent and able beings on this planet.



Hmm... we can't know in some ways if they're 'sophisticated' enough to comprehend these things. We have no way at this time of communicating with them effectively. If there is no basis for common communication, it is difficult to draw any conclusions. The same thing used to occur between radically different human cultures. The one might make assumptions about the other simply because they didn't speak the same language. So we do have a choice... we don't have to accept anything. We can choose to abstain on the basis of lack of conclusive evidence.


~Just saying that we lack evidence or means is no proper way to settle a debate. The point is to find ways around what we lack and propose ideas to answer these questions.

~Accepting a fallacy just because you assume we have no other choice is rediculous. Just cause you can't prove you are not the most intelligent and able, doesn't mean you can prove you are. I will agree that in our stereotypical thinking we are the most "civilized" using that word very loosly, however in the mind of a hawk we could be mindless, barbaric, and disgusting, compared to its majesticness, and in some aspects, i'd agree with that completely.

The problem is the human mind, and possibly any mind, is that it is way too self-conscious too realize the fallcies that their stereotupical thinking leads too, we reject what we dont understand and hold what we do understand to be greater than that of others.
PostPosted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:11 am


Bromisto
Invictus_88
Bromisto
Nothing is special of the human race. We are greedy and selfish. We think of only ourselves and no one else. We gained intelligence by luck of the draw, in my opinion anyway. We constantly kill our own species and sometimes we take our own life. We are the only animal that uses sex for pleasure. We depend on material objects like if we don't have them we will die. The only noble thing a human is able to do is gives its life for another without thought. But nobility has nothing to do with the human race being special. What I am basically trying to say is that there is nothing redeaming about us.


All intelligent animals kill other animals, only people are complex and intelligent enough to choose to kill themselves.

We do not depend upon material objects, we create them. Something that other cretures can only do in a comparatively basic way. Would you condemn birds for dying if they didn't have nests?

Apes use sex for pleasure as do dolphins. Anyway, what the devil is wrong with sex for pleasure?


What I meant is that an ipod is not a neccessity, nor is the latest game system. When a person can do something that is actually productive. For example, In your entire life would you actually need a pet rock. Yes that was not made by man but decided to put a lable on it making it a "neccissary" possesion. Or an eraser cap. Please tell you would actually use those. And nest for a bird is neccissary because it is its home.
I actually didn't know that other animals used sex for pleasure. I never ment to make it sound like that there was a problem with it but in my opinion it just makes us seem more animal like.


The only -absolutely- necessary things are ones that keep us alive. Everything else is necessary for some external purpose.

Eraser caps are necessary if you're fussy about that sort of thing, black clothes are necessary if you wish to ally yourself with a certain subculture, holidays are necessary if you feel you would benefit from a rest.

For birds, food is necessary. Nests are necessary for procreation. For apes, space is necessary to gather food and to live in. But playing games is only necessary for making friends.

We have more subsidiary needs than animals, but only because our core need for survival is so well-met by the human situation. We still have core needs and unnecessary 'wants' like other animals do. The ratio only differs because we are so good at surviving.

Invictus_88


Invictus_88

PostPosted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:21 am


Starlock
Invictus_88
Starlock
Most intelligent? Woah... back up a second here. How, precisely, are we measuring intelligence? There are many kinds of intelligence, and on some measures, nonhuman animals are vastly outdo us. And, of course, because we demand that they measure up to our own artificially constructed standards of intelligence, any test is going to be biased, most often in our own favor.


Well, we're bright enough for self-doubt too? Snazzy. Another point for team humanity.

As for bias. That's a good point. However, until another species evolves a sufficiently sophisticated brain to first comprehend abstract concepts like 'intelligence', 'value' and 'bias', and then formulate an alternative and nonhuman means for testing - we have no choice but to accept that we are the most intelligent and able beings on this planet.


Hmm... we can't know in some ways if they're 'sophisticated' enough to comprehend these things. We have no way at this time of communicating with them effectively. If there is no basis for common communication, it is difficult to draw any conclusions. The same thing used to occur between radically different human cultures. The one might make assumptions about the other simply because they didn't speak the same language. So we do have a choice... we don't have to accept anything. We can choose to abstain on the basis of lack of conclusive evidence.


That's a pretty traditional defence made by some people but it really doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

We are birght enough that we can and do set up experiments to test animal ability, we can also scan the electronic waves in their brains to see how primitive or advanced various sections are. We can also observe them unseen in their natural habitat and by watching their reaction ot dangers and new objects guage the depth of their language and interanimal understanding. The result of these studies tend to show that animals are more advanced than we used to think they were, but that even the most advanced still lack human empathy, reasoning and extrapersonal contemplation.

Indeed, we do not need to speak the same language as foreigners to see that they are brighter than animals. It is clear from their behaviour as a group that the information-bearing capacity of their incomprehensible language is far higher, that their ability to react to danger and new objects is more capable and that their solution of various problems are more advances and effective.
PostPosted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:25 am


Socrates in Disguise
Invictus_88
Bromisto
Nothing is special of the human race. We are greedy and selfish. We think of only ourselves and no one else. We gained intelligence by luck of the draw, in my opinion anyway. We constantly kill our own species and sometimes we take our own life. We are the only animal that uses sex for pleasure. We depend on material objects like if we don't have them we will die. The only noble thing a human is able to do is gives its life for another without thought. But nobility has nothing to do with the human race being special. What I am basically trying to say is that there is nothing redeaming about us.


All intelligent animals kill other animals, only people are complex and intelligent enough to choose to kill themselves.

We do not depend upon material objects, we create them. Something that other cretures can only do in a comparatively basic way. Would you condemn birds for dying if they didn't have nests?

Apes use sex for pleasure as do dolphins. Anyway, what the devil is wrong with sex for pleasure?


~HOLD ON! Take it back 40 steps sir, did you just say that suicide is intelligent!? That makes absolutely no sense. We are very complex and illogical beings yes, but the fact that we kill ourselves and others in no way makes us intelligent. That would make the US Marines "smart" and then i couldn't use the acronym "Muscles are required, intelligence not essential" to make fun of them. Which by the way, we are not the only species capable of suicide, ever heard of a lemming? They do it all the time. Are they intelligent? HELL NO!


Not that suicide is an intelligent decision to make, but that to consider it and choose to do it is a sign of extrapersonal contemplation and a supra-animal depth of emotion.

Marines only commit suicide as a result of emotional trauma usually known as PTSD. Fighting without quarter is a different thing altogether.

Lemmings don't commit suicide.

Invictus_88


Socrates in Disguise
Captain

PostPosted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 3:27 am


Invictus_88
Socrates in Disguise


~HOLD ON! Take it back 40 steps sir, did you just say that suicide is intelligent!? That makes absolutely no sense. We are very complex and illogical beings yes, but the fact that we kill ourselves and others in no way makes us intelligent. That would make the US Marines "smart" and then i couldn't use the acronym "Muscles are required, intelligence not essential" to make fun of them. Which by the way, we are not the only species capable of suicide, ever heard of a lemming? They do it all the time. Are they intelligent? HELL NO!


Not that suicide is an intelligent decision to make, but that to consider it and choose to do it is a sign of extrapersonal contemplation and a supra-animal depth of emotion.

Marines only commit suicide as a result of emotional trauma usually known as PTSD. Fighting without quarter is a different thing altogether.

Lemmings don't commit suicide.


Ok, that makes more sense. I mean not that marines commit suicude i was also referring to the killing of others. And if lemming do not commit suicide they just have massive groups of themselves jump off cliffs to their death...i would like to know what you'd call this ritual, flying lessons?
Reply
Philosophers Anonymous

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum