Welcome to Gaia! ::

Reply The Underground Library (Book Discussion)
My rant: NOT A FOP! Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

Elanchana

PostPosted: Wed May 03, 2006 9:29 pm


BakaTulip
Utakan
Elanchana
Utakan
Elanchana
Well, I don't really think he's a fop, but I like calling him that anyway because it's fun and I like the word.

Oh, those pictures: I remember reading in the libretto the characters in the opening of Il Muto. They were "Confiante", "1st Fop", and "2nd Fop". So thanks for reminding me of that.


As fun as it might be, calling Raoul a fop is like calling Albert Einstein the King of Morons. Which, as you can see, is quite pointless.


*gulp* *blush* [...]x20,000 Ummmm.....


O.o Crap, was I being mean again? I was just pointing out that yeah it's fun, but it doesn't really pertain to him. I'll admit Fop's a funny word, though.
I mean it's funny and I make fop jokes too but never seriously

My thoughts exactly.
I just say fop sometimes because I like saying it. It sounds funny and all!

Oh, and by the way, I was quoting my favorite line to Emma, and I did it like this:
Fop 1: *dances out onto the stage*
Reyer: You're fired!
Raoul: *smiles*

So there!
PostPosted: Fri May 05, 2006 12:13 pm


Elanchana
BakaTulip
Utakan
Elanchana
Utakan
Elanchana
Well, I don't really think he's a fop, but I like calling him that anyway because it's fun and I like the word.

Oh, those pictures: I remember reading in the libretto the characters in the opening of Il Muto. They were "Confiante", "1st Fop", and "2nd Fop". So thanks for reminding me of that.


As fun as it might be, calling Raoul a fop is like calling Albert Einstein the King of Morons. Which, as you can see, is quite pointless.


*gulp* *blush* [...]x20,000 Ummmm.....


O.o Crap, was I being mean again? I was just pointing out that yeah it's fun, but it doesn't really pertain to him. I'll admit Fop's a funny word, though.
I mean it's funny and I make fop jokes too but never seriously

My thoughts exactly.
I just say fop sometimes because I like saying it. It sounds funny and all!

Oh, and by the way, I was quoting my favorite line to Emma, and I did it like this:
Fop 1: *dances out onto the stage*
Reyer: You're fired!
Raoul: *smiles*

So there!
I made fun of the stereotype of Raoul with a music video I made to the song Agony and there was this one line by one of the princes "Am I not sensitive, clever, well mannered, considerate, passionate, charming, as kind as I'm handsome, and heir to a throne" and I have Raoul strutting down the stairs... but I kept it mostly because the other prince in the song has the line "Always 10 feet below, and she's just out of reach" and I went *snicker*

hazellazer


FayeKasumiValentine1

PostPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 5:14 pm


Here's my two cents. I don't hate Raoul. He has his good points. I have read the book, and must admit I like the play version of him better. As he was raised by women, he would be more open to emotion, and more sensative to his feelings. That doesn't make him a wuss, just sensative. I never considered a guy willing to risk his life to save a girl a fop. He doesn't seem to be a metrosexual. In those days, men were very concerned about looking proper in public. Raoul wants to keep up good appearences. The relations between men and women were quiet a bit different.

Erik is a complex character. I believe his murderous tendencies is due to the fact that he really doesn't know how to act around people. His father and mother abused him and shunned him, so he's really never known parental love. The only two people who have shown him any kindness was Christine and Madam Giry. He is still stuck in a stage where he can't sort out his emotions. His jealousy overtakes him and brings out his animal like tendancies to defend what he belives to be his. He feels extreme emotions of love, passion, lust, and anger. He doesn't have a "gauge" like most of us do. He doesn't know how to act in social situations. I like him, but also believe his loneliness and abuse of his past make him have the sociopath tendencies he does.

Raoul on the other hand has had a lot of expierance with society and how to act. He knows how to control his emotions. Raoul is more feminine than Erik. And crying doesn't make a man unmanly.
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 5:45 pm


The_Phantom_Penguin
*hides under a rock*

*laughs* Yes I agree with everything with this post as well. Though I believe most call him a fop merely for amusement. Not in actual seriousness. But yes he is by no means a fop.

Mlle. Daae


La Fantome de le opera

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:27 pm


Artemis12
I've never considered Raoul a 'fop'(although I have called him that several times sweatdrop ). He's cute, I'll admit. I wouldn't say no if he asked me out(unless I was already with Erik *hisses at Christine* two timer!). But, I wouldn't go out of my way to attract him. I'd much rather have the sociopath who would kill for my love. I could die in the center of such passion.<---I always wanted to love like that. *sigh*. Anyways, Raoul loves Christine, yet it's a happy fairy-tale love, which seems more suitable for Cinderella. The rich loves the poor. How touching. Yet, Erik has a dark love that has never been classified in a Disney cartoon. He has burning passion and desire. Whereas all Raoul has to offer is little childrens version of love. Maybe we just love Erik more, because we want a member of the opposite sex to express the same undying love. Maybe we just want to feel grown up. Maybe we are all secretly wishing to be dark, and falling in love with Erik is the first step out of the closet. Whatever the reason, people seem to like Erik more.

I dunno. He's so easy to hate. He cries. He has long swishy hair. And he's NOT Erik. *shrug*


*nods at Artemis's post* I can't really say I agree with you on Raoul's looks opinion, but I do agree about the love. Being in love with Raoul is like having a sweetheart in high school, holding hands, kissing, purring sweet things to each other. But if you were with Erik you would definetly feel like a goddess, I mean, having a guy (hot guy..) obsess completely over you, and watch you protectivly (I always overlook the 'peeping-tom' aspect) for your whole life. Him loving you is much farther then simply kissing and such, it's raw, untamed passion. Complete seduction and pretty much utter devotion. Yet, I would NEVER want to make Erik angry...*looks at Punjab* Definetly not... I am still in complete utter Erik devotion, wanting more than just a boyfriend, to feel real passion. From the bottom of your soul. Dark characters turn me on also.... It just makes you want to hug him! Shunned by society, having to hide under a friggin opera house and not kill yourself before long after, it's so sad. I admire the genius in him also, not just the heavenly voice and such. I mean, if you beleive that he DID build the opera house, and all of the hidden traps and such, quite impressive. I still Raoul a fop, but that's only because of the movie and how I personally portrey him, no offense to anyone. I just do it to poke fun. But, just to make a point, I never liked it in the 2004 movie that when Christine had to choose between the two of them, he never said anything like....
'Christine, choose your life! Don't worry about me! Save yourself!'
I do admire most of your guys points on the matter though.
PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 7:18 pm


La Fantome de le opera
I still Raoul a fop, but that's only because of the movie and how I personally portrey him, no offense to anyone. I just do it to poke fun. But, just to make a point, I never liked it in the 2004 movie that when Christine had to choose between the two of them, he never said anything like....
'Christine, choose your life! Don't worry about me! Save yourself!'
I do admire most of your guys points on the matter though.


No, he said (and I quote), "For pity's sake, Christine, say no! Don't throw your life away for my sake!"

Or did we miss that part?

And of course the rub is that whether you intend it or not, calling Raoul a fop does offend people. Like me.

PhantomoftheFox


Bleeding Art

Obsessive Kitten

PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:18 pm


PhantomoftheFox
La Fantome de le opera
I still Raoul a fop, but that's only because of the movie and how I personally portrey him, no offense to anyone. I just do it to poke fun. But, just to make a point, I never liked it in the 2004 movie that when Christine had to choose between the two of them, he never said anything like....
'Christine, choose your life! Don't worry about me! Save yourself!'
I do admire most of your guys points on the matter though.


No, he said (and I quote), "For pity's sake, Christine, say no! Don't throw your life away for my sake!"

Or did we miss that part?

And of course the rub is that whether you intend it or not, calling Raoul a fop does offend people. Like me.


I second that. You can do it in all fun and whatnot, but here in the Guild we do respect Raoul. Some members may not like him persay, but we do discourage the namecalling. It's not fair to those who support Raoul and we don't need Guild civil war.
PostPosted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:05 pm


Utakan
PhantomoftheFox
La Fantome de le opera
I still Raoul a fop, but that's only because of the movie and how I personally portrey him, no offense to anyone. I just do it to poke fun. But, just to make a point, I never liked it in the 2004 movie that when Christine had to choose between the two of them, he never said anything like....
'Christine, choose your life! Don't worry about me! Save yourself!'
I do admire most of your guys points on the matter though.


No, he said (and I quote), "For pity's sake, Christine, say no! Don't throw your life away for my sake!"

Or did we miss that part?

And of course the rub is that whether you intend it or not, calling Raoul a fop does offend people. Like me.


I second that. You can do it in all fun and whatnot, but here in the Guild we do respect Raoul. Some members may not like him persay, but we do discourage the namecalling. It's not fair to those who support Raoul and we don't need Guild civil war.

Hmm, *remembers line* Oh shoot. I did forget that part. I'm sorry. sad

La Fantome de le opera


PhantomoftheFox

PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:07 pm


Everyone always forgets Raoul's lines. *sigh*

If people were making fun of a flaw Raoul actually had, it'd be a lot less annoying. I don't think any Raoul fans have a problem with people teasing him for being headstrong and emotional, because it's true and it is funny when you exaggerate it and make him barrel blindly into danger all the time. The damn 'fop' thing is just so out-of-left-field and OOC that it's annoying.
Imagine if 95% of the phans you talked to were completely convinced that Erik was a flamboyantly gay transvestite, and were constantly ragging on him for it and you'll get an idea of just how annoying.
PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 10:43 pm


I love reading this thread. Makes me feel like an idiot. lol Always a good thing.

I'll admit he was somewhat dependent on the Persian in the book, which is why the word 'wimp' popped into my head at some point (don't kill me! sweatdrop ) but as many people have already pointed out, the fact he managed to survive the torture chamber is proof enough he isn't a wimp. He's a young man braving a foreign challenge who had the privilege of having an experienced partner to help him along.

I only thought of this after reading the thread, but part of the wonderful thing about the book Raoul is that he is definetly not your "Knight in Shining Armor". How many stories have you seen where the hero saves the heroine by himself? Too many. The Persian factor adds a bit of realism. It takes a weather-weary, powerful, almost emotionless man to survive the psychological aspect of the torture chamber. If Raoul was that man, he would not be able to love Christine with as much innocent and fiery passion as he does.

As for the movie version...
Hey, he did win the sword fight and undo the underwater trap. And the tear during Point of No Return? Same as the carriage scenario. Your girlfriend is singing with a murderer onstage because you told her to be there!!! There are guns pointing in her general direction from all sides, and you have no idea what tricks the Phantom might pull. What else is a guy supposed to feel?!?

As for the hair? Face it, Patrick Wilson is too pretty for his own good. lol

Good God that turned out to be a LONG post. eek

Jusy


Who is Puffer Fish

PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:03 am


Miss Oddly Charming Rhea
He may not be a fop, but he is still a pansy >.< *was annoyed by the superflous crying in the novel* I'm all for men displaying their emotions, but he was so whiny! And what really ticks me off is that he never DID anything about what was upsetting him XP Silly man.

I agree. he cries too much. Plus he's too girly. (the long hair? come on! Most guys do have long hair, but that's a bit insane. He pulls it into a ponytail for crying out loud!)
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:49 pm


`~[Christine--Daae]~`
Miss Oddly Charming Rhea
He may not be a fop, but he is still a pansy >.< *was annoyed by the superflous crying in the novel* I'm all for men displaying their emotions, but he was so whiny! And what really ticks me off is that he never DID anything about what was upsetting him XP Silly man.

I agree. he cries too much. Plus he's too girly. (the long hair? come on! Most guys do have long hair, but that's a bit insane. He pulls it into a ponytail for crying out loud!)


I have three observations on this...

For one thing, the hair is only in the 2004 movie. No one insists that Erik is a fop because he wears that ridiculous poofy shirt in one scene, so why should people say Raoul is girly because that ONE version of him has what they consider a girly haircut.

For another thing, just because current fashion says that long hair is 'girly' doesn't mean that it was in that time period. Most people today think capes and cravats are stupid too, but no one says that Gerik is a big goon for wearing them.

And lastly, am I the only one who finds it a little amusing that the same fangirls who wail about how unfaaair it is that everyone judged Erik because of his face turn around and do the exact same to Raoul because of his hair or his skin? You don't get to be selective of who you're going to judge on appearances.

PhantomoftheFox


Bleeding Art

Obsessive Kitten

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:18 pm


PhantomoftheFox
`~[Christine--Daae]~`
Miss Oddly Charming Rhea
He may not be a fop, but he is still a pansy >.< *was annoyed by the superflous crying in the novel* I'm all for men displaying their emotions, but he was so whiny! And what really ticks me off is that he never DID anything about what was upsetting him XP Silly man.

I agree. he cries too much. Plus he's too girly. (the long hair? come on! Most guys do have long hair, but that's a bit insane. He pulls it into a ponytail for crying out loud!)


I have three observations on this...

For one thing, the hair is only in the 2004 movie. No one insists that Erik is a fop because he wears that ridiculous poofy shirt in one scene, so why should people say Raoul is girly because that ONE version of him has what they consider a girly haircut.

For another thing, just because current fashion says that long hair is 'girly' doesn't mean that it was in that time period. Most people today think capes and cravats are stupid too, but no one says that Gerik is a big goon for wearing them.

And lastly, am I the only one who finds it a little amusing that the same fangirls who wail about how unfaaair it is that everyone judged Erik because of his face turn around and do the exact same to Raoul because of his hair or his skin? You don't get to be selective of who you're going to judge on appearances.


Geeze. ONE version he has long hair and suddenly he's an all around fop? In the book, he didn't. He had blonde hair and a mustache. Even if he did, it was not uncommon. It's absolutely ridiculous that the "phans" (the quotation marks saying they are not true ones and this is NOT pointing to anyone directly) base their opinions solely on what certain ideals are thought to be today. In fact, it's the only arguements they have for Raoul. He's girly by TODAY'S standards. He's a wimp because he cries and men crying openly today is obviously wrong.

ERIK CRIES. Everything Raoul does that makes him girly ERIK DOES TOO. People forget this because "omg, Erik is awesome and Raoul's a noob!!!!111" For God sake no he isn't. Erik was designed as the villain of the book as well as an aside pitiable object. Leroux wanted Erik to be more human than "the big bad ugly who stole the hero's girl". He wanted Erik to be a character you could say "poor thing" to and then think logically about the whole plot. Not just "oh, he's bad. Kill him!"

It makes no sense to side with Erik because he's a whiny little thing. Yes I said whiny. The man clings to Christine's skirts and kisses the hem for God sake for pity. He cries when he gets a kiss on the forehead. He is basically a child and acts every inch of it beyond his logistics and IQ. Raoul is the basic Knight in Shining Armor that every girl wants. He is the ideal man, he was made to be. So why, again, do fangirls find the need to bash a man they themselves would 99% of the time go with if put in the same situation?
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 2:32 pm


Oi...I can't believe I said that before...I NO LONGER MEAN IT!! I've seen the...er...Phantom-light? I now know that he is not a fop, hair or not. (I personally don't think masks and capes are stupid, but that's because of Erik. blaugh )

Who is Puffer Fish

Reply
The Underground Library (Book Discussion)

Goto Page: [] [<] 1 2 3 ... 4 5 6 7 [>] [»|]
 
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum