|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:51 pm
shrab uh who said anything about puttin DAD in. ofcoarse that wouldnt work in the deck i have here. thats obvious. no one did it's called an example.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:52 pm
an example without a purpose? i was asking to help with synergy not help with adding in cards to accomidate one monster.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:56 pm
shrab an example without a purpose? i was asking to help with synergy not help with adding in cards to accomidate one monster. you can't read can you......... "original quote" You: there are ways to replace cards to create synergy without chaning the whole deck Me: not in you're case you: why not Me: my example
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 1:59 pm
ok maybe you have trouble reading because DAD fits into this nowhere and your using him as an example . what would he be replacing in this example of yours. nothing thats right. now suggesting something that would make sense might help to further your example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:00 pm
shrab ok maybe you have trouble reading because DAD fits into this nowhere and your using him as an example . what would he be replacing in this example of yours. nothing thats right. now suggesting something that would make sense might help to further your example. Again you can't read the example means you can't put good cards in any deck. You're an idiot. And what's worse you already figured out what it meant and you still don't understand what I'm saying. I suggest quitting this game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:07 pm
i would suggest lightening up and trying to play a game for the purpose of a game. to be competitive but still have fun. anyway yes i get what you are saying but its stupid. DAD is only a good card provided you use a deck he fits in i choose not to use that kind of deck. anyway im not even planning on using this deck for competitive play. for that i have my frog deck which has proven itself more than a match for the meta. although i do have some mods to make on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:09 pm
shrab i would suggest lightening up and trying to play a game for the purpose of a game. to be competitive but still have fun. anyway yes i get what you are saying but its stupid. DAD is only a good card provided you use a deck he fits in i choose not to use that kind of deck. anyway im not even planning on using this deck for competitive play. for that i have my frog deck which has proven itself more than a match for the meta. although i do have some mods to make on it. I'm actually not being harsh, want me to be mean? And frogs are bad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:09 pm
shrab for that i have my frog deck which has proven itself more than a match for the meta. Meta > Frogs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:11 pm
haha well that one you are completely wrong on. frogs have the potential to completely destroy lightsworn, blackwings, ect... and im proof of that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:12 pm
shrab haha well that one you are completely wrong on. frogs have the potential to completely destroy lightsworn, blackwings, ect... and im proof of that. No otherwise they'd be dominating the meta right now. And that's no where near true. You're proof of what? Another statistic of bad players? Yea sounds about right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:13 pm
shrab haha well that one you are completely wrong on. frogs have the potential to completely destroy lightsworn, blackwings, ect... and im proof of that. Then I'll be calling out your list, because this deck certainly shows none of your "potential". Frogs are a sad attempt of a stand against the meta. All you're example of is just another member of this guild thinking you're the s**t when you just play s**t.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:13 pm
only cards i have seen counter my frogs are. royal oppresion, brionac, and thunder kind. besides that i have been able to handle every other deck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:17 pm
shrab only cards i have seen counter my frogs are. royal oppresion, brionac, and thunder kind. besides that i have been able to handle every other deck. you're locals doesn't count towards any statistic because A. no viable proof, B. every locals consist of 90-99% bad players in some cases 100%. I can care less how well you think you do with your frogs, 9/10 they suck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:17 pm
imasexxigirl shrab haha well that one you are completely wrong on. frogs have the potential to completely destroy lightsworn, blackwings, ect... and im proof of that. Then I'll be calling out your list, because this deck certainly shows none of your "potential". Frogs are a sad attempt of a stand against the meta. All you're example of is just another member of this guild thinking you're the s**t when you just play s**t. i never said i was anything near good im simply saying you arent either. and if you want a list for my frog deck ill post my newest version of it sometime at the end of this week which is when ill have the modifications done. i will also go to my local tourny (which 60% of people there use good meta decks) and i will comeback and post with the deck my results in the tourny including the deck i faced and everything. anything else you want me to provide for verification of the frog decks playability just ask.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 2:18 pm
shrab imasexxigirl shrab haha well that one you are completely wrong on. frogs have the potential to completely destroy lightsworn, blackwings, ect... and im proof of that. Then I'll be calling out your list, because this deck certainly shows none of your "potential". Frogs are a sad attempt of a stand against the meta. All you're example of is just another member of this guild thinking you're the s**t when you just play s**t. i never said i was anything near good im simply saying you arent either. and if you want a list for my frog deck ill post my newest version of it sometime at the end of this week which is when ill have the modifications done. i will also go to my local tourny (which 60% of people there use good meta decks) and i will comeback and post with the deck my results in the tourny including the deck i faced and everything. anything else you want me to provide for verification of the frog decks playability just ask. local's don't mean anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
