|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:35 pm
Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence In an important situation that really wont matter. Back when Katrina hit all the cops went to every gun owners house and took their guns from them. If you ask me, in a situation like that, I would prefer a gun. Police act like they are above the law, and they will do as they please. Why did they do that? Because of looting or something? They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:38 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence In an important situation that really wont matter. Back when Katrina hit all the cops went to every gun owners house and took their guns from them. If you ask me, in a situation like that, I would prefer a gun. Police act like they are above the law, and they will do as they please. Why did they do that? Because of looting or something? They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:39 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work. lol that's not actually what i meant, but it ironically fits my viewpoint... what i meant was that there is not a singly system of government existing in the world that works well. thus, none of the governmental forms are good. none are best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:40 pm
Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence In an important situation that really wont matter. Back when Katrina hit all the cops went to every gun owners house and took their guns from them. If you ask me, in a situation like that, I would prefer a gun. Police act like they are above the law, and they will do as they please. Why did they do that? Because of looting or something? They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... Oh I know, I hate your government... and I hate my government because they love your government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:43 pm
Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence In an important situation that really wont matter. Back when Katrina hit all the cops went to every gun owners house and took their guns from them. If you ask me, in a situation like that, I would prefer a gun. Police act like they are above the law, and they will do as they please. Why did they do that? Because of looting or something? They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... Oh I know, I hate your government... and I hate my government because they love your government move to amsterdam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:44 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work. lol that's not actually what i meant, but it ironically fits my viewpoint... what i meant was that there is not a singly system of government existing in the world that works well. thus, none of the governmental forms are good. none are best. Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:55 pm
Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work. lol that's not actually what i meant, but it ironically fits my viewpoint... what i meant was that there is not a singly system of government existing in the world that works well. thus, none of the governmental forms are good. none are best. Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:56 pm
Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work. lol that's not actually what i meant, but it ironically fits my viewpoint... what i meant was that there is not a singly system of government existing in the world that works well. thus, none of the governmental forms are good. none are best. Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:01 pm
Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work. lol that's not actually what i meant, but it ironically fits my viewpoint... what i meant was that there is not a singly system of government existing in the world that works well. thus, none of the governmental forms are good. none are best. Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk If he is like Bush razz If he's a decent guy then it would be good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:04 pm
Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Yeah, too bad it wouldn't work. lol that's not actually what i meant, but it ironically fits my viewpoint... what i meant was that there is not a singly system of government existing in the world that works well. thus, none of the governmental forms are good. none are best. Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk If he is like Bush razz If he's a decent guy then it would be good no, a world leader WOULD be worse. to be involved in politics on any leve, one must thirst for power. the higher the office, the more power-hungry, egotistical, and authoritarian the individual becomes. a world leader would never, EVER be a decent guy. instead you'd end up with a charismatic, power hungry, totalitarian despot - someone like hitler or stalin or nero or caligula or pol pot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:09 pm
MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk If he is like Bush razz If he's a decent guy then it would be good no, a world leader WOULD be worse. to be involved in politics on any leve, one must thirst for power. the higher the office, the more power-hungry, egotistical, and authoritarian the individual becomes. a world leader would never, EVER be a decent guy. instead you'd end up with a charismatic, power hungry, totalitarian despot - someone like hitler or stalin or nero or caligula or pol pot. What if we nominated Dr. Steel?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:12 pm
MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk If he is like Bush razz If he's a decent guy then it would be good no, a world leader WOULD be worse. to be involved in politics on any leve, one must thirst for power. the higher the office, the more power-hungry, egotistical, and authoritarian the individual becomes. a world leader would never, EVER be a decent guy. instead you'd end up with a charismatic, power hungry, totalitarian despot - someone like hitler or stalin or nero or caligula or pol pot. Well then what if the UN controlled the world? Basically a world government made up of the current presidents Digi: loool that guys wierd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Digital Malevolence Vice Captain
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:25 pm
Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk If he is like Bush razz If he's a decent guy then it would be good no, a world leader WOULD be worse. to be involved in politics on any leve, one must thirst for power. the higher the office, the more power-hungry, egotistical, and authoritarian the individual becomes. a world leader would never, EVER be a decent guy. instead you'd end up with a charismatic, power hungry, totalitarian despot - someone like hitler or stalin or nero or caligula or pol pot. Well then what if the UN controlled the world? Basically a world government made up of the current presidents Digi: loool that guys wierd That guy has the best advertising scheme I've seen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:48 pm
MegaTherion777 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence In an important situation that really wont matter. Back when Katrina hit all the cops went to every gun owners house and took their guns from them. If you ask me, in a situation like that, I would prefer a gun. Police act like they are above the law, and they will do as they please. Why did they do that? Because of looting or something? They didn't want things getting "out of control". They were trying to prevent a bad situation, their intentions were good, but I feel that was a huge violation of personal rights. They took the guns from people who bought them LEGALLY! They are so stupid, its usually the people who get them illegally that cause the problems. I see Yeah. The U.S. Gov isn't the best.... no government is best. @ hollow - you have a strong disliking of po-po too? yet another reason for us to get married I appreciate them putting their lives on the line and of all that jazz, but honestly. Their attitude sucks, they act like they own the road, and if they let you off for ANYTHING, you should be immensly greatful. This cop once followed my dad for like 5 miles one day tailgating him all the way, waiting till he did something wrong. Cop finally pulled him over and issued him a ticket because his tags were expried, my dad explained that he called 2 weeks before and they were in the mail. Cop gave him a ticket anyway. Like 2 days later my dad got his tags and still had to pay a fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:10 pm
Celtic guardian91 MegaTherion777 Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Celtic guardian91 Digital Malevolence Oh lol. @Celtic: I don't know much about your government. Basically your government, but on a smaller scale and without the death penalty lol There should just be one government/world leader if you ask me... like on Futurama Mega: rofl I'll just be at the weed cafe's all the time xd A world leader would be worse... gonk If he is like Bush razz If he's a decent guy then it would be good no, a world leader WOULD be worse. to be involved in politics on any leve, one must thirst for power. the higher the office, the more power-hungry, egotistical, and authoritarian the individual becomes. a world leader would never, EVER be a decent guy. instead you'd end up with a charismatic, power hungry, totalitarian despot - someone like hitler or stalin or nero or caligula or pol pot. Well then what if the UN controlled the world? Basically a world government made up of the current presidents Digi: loool that guys wierd yes, because the UN is sooooo effective now, because everyone is willing to set aside their differences and work together and make compromises to settle problems rolleyes trust me, the US is not the only country who brings problems into the UN. plus, a world government is bad, because even if it's not a dictatorship, having an illuminati, a new world order, a society of the priveleged and elite ruling over everyone else would only end badly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
