|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:47 am
sachiko_sohma Wouldn't it only be fair to let the man have a say too? It's his child as well (the woman didn't get pregnant on her own). Well, I feel that this is something that a couple needs to discuss at great length (hopefully before they ever have sex at all, as well as after they get pregnant unintentionally). I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! But there comes the problem when a couple didn't discuss this matter beforehand, and disagrees about what to do about the unintentional pregnancy. Who should get the final say? The woman? The man? Should they have to take it to court (and how could there be a court that could rule on this before the pregnancy was over?)?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:22 am
WatersMoon110 sachiko_sohma Wouldn't it only be fair to let the man have a say too? It's his child as well (the woman didn't get pregnant on her own). Well, I feel that this is something that a couple needs to discuss at great length (hopefully before they ever have sex at all, as well as after they get pregnant unintentionally). I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! But there comes the problem when a couple didn't discuss this matter beforehand, and disagrees about what to do about the unintentional pregnancy. Who should get the final say? The woman? The man? Should they have to take it to court (and how could there be a court that could rule on this before the pregnancy was over?)? First of all, if the guy is abusive, she should try and leave him or get help (report him to the police if neccessary). If they aren't comfertable enough to discuss sex with their partner then their ovious not ready but in that case, i'm not sure what they should do. All I know is that they're both responisble and the child belongs to both of them.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:34 am
sachiko_sohma WatersMoon110 sachiko_sohma Wouldn't it only be fair to let the man have a say too? It's his child as well (the woman didn't get pregnant on her own). Well, I feel that this is something that a couple needs to discuss at great length (hopefully before they ever have sex at all, as well as after they get pregnant unintentionally). I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! But there comes the problem when a couple didn't discuss this matter beforehand, and disagrees about what to do about the unintentional pregnancy. Who should get the final say? The woman? The man? Should they have to take it to court (and how could there be a court that could rule on this before the pregnancy was over?)? First of all, if the guy is abusive, she should try and leave him or get help (report him to the police if neccessary). If they aren't comfertable enough to discuss sex with their partner then their ovious not ready but in that case, i'm not sure what they should do. All I know is that they're both responisble and the child belongs to both of them. I agree with you there.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:23 am
WatersMoon110 I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! One of the situations where I would have an abortion without fail is if the father was abusive. When I worked in a domestic violence shelter and safe exchange center, I watched as women were tied for the rest of their lives to abusive men because they had a child together (and I'm sure it can go the other way--the woman abusing the man while he is tied to her through his child--but I didn't see that). If I thought I could sever the man's parental rights because he abused me, I would reconsider. But that's never the case. Instead, I had to watch as women were forced to do things like go to court and justify why they hadn't wanted to hand their child over to the father for the scheduled visit immediately after he went into an intense rage and threatened the staff of the exchange center.
Now, I hope to avoid this situation altogether by never having sex with an abusive man, but I don't imagine any of the people who get caught in this situation sat around thinking, "Wow, s/he really is abusive! I want to have a baby with her/him."
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:46 am
ShadowIce WatersMoon110 I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! One of the situations where I would have an abortion without fail is if the father was abusive. When I worked in a domestic violence shelter and safe exchange center, I watched as women were tied for the rest of their lives to abusive men because they had a child together (and I'm sure it can go the other way--the woman abusing the man while he is tied to her through his child--but I didn't see that). If I thought I could sever the man's parental rights because he abused me, I would reconsider. But that's never the case. Instead, I had to watch as women were forced to do things like go to court and justify why they hadn't wanted to hand their child over to the father for the scheduled visit immediately after he went into an intense rage and threatened the staff of the exchange center.
Now, I hope to avoid this situation altogether by never having sex with an abusive man, but I don't imagine any of the people who get caught in this situation sat around thinking, "Wow, s/he really is abusive! I want to have a baby with her/him."Thankfully, all members of my family are no longer with abusive partners. I've heard of cases where a biological parent's rights were severed due to abuse, but also of many more cases where this couldn't be proven and so couldn't happen. It's a very scary situation. I've heard of women (and I'm sure there are also men) who have fled with their children from abusive relationships and not been found by their abusers. Of course, this also means no child support, so it isn't the best solution (of course, the best solution would have to be to never get involved with someone who is abusive, but sometimes bad things happen, and the best thing that one can do is to leave the abusive relationship), but it is better than staying with someone who harms you or your children. There have been cases of women being killed by (presumably) abusive boyfriends and husbands because they refused to abort, so it isn't as though all abusers would want children. *sigh* I just wish there were some way to keep people from abusing anyone.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 12:45 pm
ShadowIce WatersMoon110 I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! One of the situations where I would have an abortion without fail is if the father was abusive. When I worked in a domestic violence shelter and safe exchange center, I watched as women were tied for the rest of their lives to abusive men because they had a child together (and I'm sure it can go the other way--the woman abusing the man while he is tied to her through his child--but I didn't see that). If I thought I could sever the man's parental rights because he abused me, I would reconsider. But that's never the case. Instead, I had to watch as women were forced to do things like go to court and justify why they hadn't wanted to hand their child over to the father for the scheduled visit immediately after he went into an intense rage and threatened the staff of the exchange center.
Now, I hope to avoid this situation altogether by never having sex with an abusive man, but I don't imagine any of the people who get caught in this situation sat around thinking, "Wow, s/he really is abusive! I want to have a baby with her/him."I personally would never abort the fetus just cause of an abusive partner. I would feel like i'm punishing the child for what my partner did. I would most likely try to get help and get out of that relation and most likely put my child up for adoption and give it to a family where it would be safe.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:37 pm
miyo_esparanza sachiko_sohma 4 Why do people take adoption into concideration or at least think about it? It's also an option for people that can't care for the child, yet will still be able to have a life. Not to sound rude (more like i'm curious), but how is aborting a child you don't want or can't care for not out of personal gain? I think you mean why 'don't' they? If that's what you mean, then here's my reasons for it:
First and foremost, adoption is something my husband and I have also discussed extensively when talking about what we would do should I again become unexpectedly pregnant, and for some reason we cannot care for it. It's not that we haven't considered it at all, we have considered it a LOT, actually.
I was adopted. I was put into the foster care system when I was 5, along with two of my biological sisters (ages 2 and infant). I was adopted when I was about 6 1/2. It was the worst time of my life. The first few years of my life were equally as difficult, since neither of my biological parents were capable of caring for me. The years after I was adopted were spent going through tons of therapy to try and help me cope with the various issues I had from being abandoned by my biological parents. It didn't help that I still had visits with my biological parents (I really really hated the whole 'open adoption' thing; it can be good for some, but VERY detrimental to others), because everyother weekend I was faced with seeing one or the other of them, and always went home wondering why mommy and daddy didn't love me enough to take care of me, or at least keep me.
I would never want to put one of my babies into the adoption system, my husband wouldn't want that, the pressure from the rest of both of our families would be to the point of being disowned, AND trying to explain to my existing children 'Well, Mommy's growing a baby brother or sister for you in her belly, but we're going to give it away because we can't pay for it.' is just .... unthinkable.
I personally, for the situation I'm in, would not abort a baby because I didn't want him. I would want any of my babies to live, could I somehow care for them. As for aborting a baby that I couldn't care for ... I don't feel that I have anything to gain from it, and everything to lose from not aborting. I'm more afraid of the damage that it would do to my existing children and family, then what I could gain from aborting that child.In reading over this post, I'm left with the impression that you and your husband are in touch with your familes and (correct me if I'm wrong) they would be upset if you had a baby and gave it up for adoption. Would they be willing to help if the situation came up? My sister has taken in not one but two of her step-grandchildren when necessary (the younger one ended up being adopted by an aunt). Also, there really are a lot of organizations out there to help with children. I realize that there's little chance of such a thing happening, but there really are other options besides just abortion or adoption.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 12:54 pm
Texas Gypsy In reading over this post, I'm left with the impression that you and your husband are in touch with your familes and (correct me if I'm wrong) they would be upset if you had a baby and gave it up for adoption. Would they be willing to help if the situation came up? My sister has taken in not one but two of her step-grandchildren when necessary (the younger one ended up being adopted by an aunt). Also, there really are a lot of organizations out there to help with children. I realize that there's little chance of such a thing happening, but there really are other options besides just abortion or adoption. That's a great point. Family members can take in children to raise, or just help with raising children. When my nephew was a baby, I moved in with my sister to help out. When he was older, and she went back to college, myself, my mother, and my brothers all helped with babysitting. There are government organizations (like WIC) that will help buying necessities, and private organizations that will help with food and clothes. My sister also traded babysitting with a women with two small girls who lived down the street.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 3:15 pm
ShadowIce WatersMoon110 I hope that any woman not in an abusive relationship would discuss a pregnancy with her partner! One of the situations where I would have an abortion without fail is if the father was abusive. When I worked in a domestic violence shelter and safe exchange center, I watched as women were tied for the rest of their lives to abusive men because they had a child together (and I'm sure it can go the other way--the woman abusing the man while he is tied to her through his child--but I didn't see that). If I thought I could sever the man's parental rights because he abused me, I would reconsider. But that's never the case. Instead, I had to watch as women were forced to do things like go to court and justify why they hadn't wanted to hand their child over to the father for the scheduled visit immediately after he went into an intense rage and threatened the staff of the exchange center.
Now, I hope to avoid this situation altogether by never having sex with an abusive man, but I don't imagine any of the people who get caught in this situation sat around thinking, "Wow, s/he really is abusive! I want to have a baby with her/him."If someone is abusing you, stab them in their sleep. Not being facecious. I don't stand for that s**t. If there is absolutely no legal way to make them gtfo, destroy the problem.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2007 8:44 pm
Texas Gypsy In reading over this post, I'm left with the impression that you and your husband are in touch with your familes and (correct me if I'm wrong) they would be upset if you had a baby and gave it up for adoption. Would they be willing to help if the situation came up? My sister has taken in not one but two of her step-grandchildren when necessary (the younger one ended up being adopted by an aunt). Also, there really are a lot of organizations out there to help with children. I realize that there's little chance of such a thing happening, but there really are other options besides just abortion or adoption. We are in touch with our families to the extent that they gossip about our lives, and make things miserable for us. It's hard to explain our situation. Don't get me wrong, if it 'got out' that I had an abortion, I'd never live that down either, same as with adoption. An abortion would be easier to hide from them, to be perfectly honest. Not to mention, I still don't know how I'd try to explain to my existing children why their new baby brother or sister didn't live with us/had to be given away.
As far as helping out ... I was actually adopted by my biological mother's sister, after spending a few years in foster care. It worked well then, but everyone in my family that helped out then is too old to do so now, and since I'm the oldest in my generation, everyone else is too young.
If I got unexpectedly pregnant again after having this baby (who is now a week overdue, I may add scream ), it's not that I would abort right away, no questions asked. The further down the road we get, the more likely we'd keep it. It would depend on a LOT of things at the time.
As for organizations that help out ... well ... I know alot about them, because they helped me when I was a kid, and my husband and I tend to need all the resources we can get our hands on. We don't make a lot of money, and two kids at this point is already stretching us nearly to the breaking point. If it wasn't for Food Banks, and other really helpful organizations (there's one where they basically offer free babysitting: FTW!) in our area, we'd be in a LOT of trouble.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:30 pm
sachiko_sohma I personally would never abort the fetus just cause of an abusive partner. I would feel like i'm punishing the child for what my partner did. Although I understand why you would feel that way, my intention would not be to hold the fetus responsible for the sins of its father. Instead, it would be to keep the father the hell away from me. If there was some other way for me to ensure that the man couldn't hurt me, my decision might change. But the court system isn't set up that way. It is almost impossible to keep parents away from their children, even if the parents are abusive. If the father abuses the mother (or the other way around) the courts often rule that this has nothing to do with the abuser's right to see his/her child. If the abuser hurts the child, the court system is often really, really willing to give second, third, fourth, and millionth chances even if the abuse was really bad.sachiko_sohma I would most likely try to get help and get out of that relation and most likely put my child up for adoption and give it to a family where it would be safe. See, but if the father claims his parental rights, you can't stick the child up for adoption. At best, he would get the kid. At worst, he'd get the kid and sue you for child support, leaving you in the same situation of being stuck with him as if you had kept the child. And quite frankly, I'd rather have an abortion than knowingly hand my child over to an abusive person. Not all people are going to agree with me here (and that's okay) but that's where I stand.divineseraph If someone is abusing you, stab them in their sleep. Not being facecious. I don't stand for that s**t. If there is absolutely no legal way to make them gtfo, destroy the problem. But then I would likely go to jail, and I think jail can be pretty damned abusive, too. emo
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 10:35 am
ShadowIce divineseraph If someone is abusing you, stab them in their sleep. Not being facecious. I don't stand for that s**t. If there is absolutely no legal way to make them gtfo, destroy the problem. But then I would likely go to jail, and I think jail can be pretty damned abusive, too. emo There have been cases where (I think they were all) women have killed abusive partners and not gotten charged with murder (battered woman syndrome). But it isn't as common as it was at one point. I also wouldn't want to go to jail, so I don't plan on killing anyone.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:35 pm
WatersMoon110 ShadowIce divineseraph If someone is abusing you, stab them in their sleep. Not being facecious. I don't stand for that s**t. If there is absolutely no legal way to make them gtfo, destroy the problem. But then I would likely go to jail, and I think jail can be pretty damned abusive, too. emo There have been cases where (I think they were all) women have killed abusive partners and not gotten charged with murder (battered woman syndrome). But it isn't as common as it was at one point. I also wouldn't want to go to jail, so I don't plan on killing anyone. It's not ok to kill an abuser using your offspring as a trap, but it IS ok to kill your offspring to get him away? Seems a bit unfair, to me. I'm not for the "sins of our fathers" thing.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 7:47 pm
divineseraph It's not ok to kill an abuser using your offspring as a trap, but it IS ok to kill your offspring to get him away? Seems a bit unfair, to me. I'm not for the "sins of our fathers" thing. How were the offspring being used as a trap? o.O?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:09 pm
divineseraph It's not ok to kill an abuser using your offspring as a trap, but it IS ok to kill your offspring to get him away? Well, killing the abuser to keep myself from being abused wouldn't work (as I would probably end up in jail, an abusive place) but having an abortion (killing my offspring) would. Certainly killing my abuser would keep him from abusing me, but I haven't managed to accomplish much if someone else takes his place.divineseraph Seems a bit unfair, to me. I hate to say this, but it's an unfair situation. If it wasn't, then abusers wouldn't be able to use their children to get at their victims.divineseraph I'm not for the "sins of our fathers" thing. Once again, it has nothing to do with the sins of the father. It has to do with not being abused. It's kind of like how I would absolutely, positively terminate a pregnancy that resulted from rape unless I was absolutely, positively sure I could terminate the rapist's parental rights. I am not tying myself to someone who is going to hurt me. I'm sorry, but that's just not a sacrifice I'm willing to make. If you can think of options other than putting myself in a situation where I am going to spend years (if not longer) being abused so that the fetus can be born, I'm willing to listen.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|