|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:04 pm
There should be a map to an HT-2200, its big enough without being to big.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:06 pm
Actually guys, i was thinking a modifed Consular Class Space Cruiser.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Bit on the big side there Cale, a 115 meter boat.
Thats sorta why I suggested the YZ-775. Similar layout and crew requirement, but not up in the range of CR90.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:11 pm
No good. I'm tempted to just ask the kid to be a passenger this first time around.
We have 8 people aboard right now. We can only take two more.
And a the Consular was one of my picks way back. I like that ship, plus shes moderately fast and customizable as Chaos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:15 pm
stellarmagic Bit on the big side there Cale, a 115 meter boat. Thats sorta why I suggested the YZ-775. Similar layout and crew requirement, but not up in the range of CR90. Yeah, but I still enjoy the idea of a multi-deck ship The YZ-775 doesnt have that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:16 pm
Well, if I accept this kid, thats another Corellian, this one being an ex-stormie merc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:20 pm
The Consular has speed, and can be outfitted any which way to the Core. Be it cargo, guns, shielding, etc....
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Consular-class_space_cruiser
Can someone find a zoomed-in schematic, that ones rubbish.
But with a bigger ship, comes more responsibility, and this one needs a bit more of a specialized crew. But we can do this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:22 pm
People will at least have more jobs. But I am in need of a map of the thing so I know what I'm at least talking about.
Ugh. I might have to make a trip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:25 pm
We'd have to figure out her configuration and stats ourselves as they aren't offered
But can we make enough to keep a bird this big up?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:28 pm
I can't imagine cargo capacity to be that good for a boat in that size-class. Really slender hull, most of the ship is engine with little room left for cargo when you add in the crew and passenger quarters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:33 pm
Des, I've got stats for it. All we need to do is make the Salon Pod a Cargo Pod and attach external container clamps to the outside.
Alone she hauls a kiloton of stuff. Swap the Salon pod for a cargo pod and thats another 1000 tons at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:36 pm
Keep the Salon Pod as a special cabin or lounge. But the external container claps was something I was about the suggest. But whats that gonna do to her speed and agility?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:38 pm
Damn you Jag! You're gonna outstrip my BFF-1 At this rate.
I did have a really funny idea, have you guys considered a cargo conversion of the KDB-1 Broadside Light Cruiser?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:42 pm
stellarmagic Damn you Jag! You're gonna outstrip my BFF-1 At this rate. I did have a really funny idea, have you guys considered a cargo conversion of the KDB-1 Broadside Light Cruiser? Thats a sardine can for just three people.... And maybe this will make more sense as to why we are making trouble for a company with a small fleet of ships opposed to our one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:46 pm
As a side note, the Bebop "Mothership" from Cowboy Bebop was 142 meters long. I would have prefered to use that other ship I had you working on, Stellar (Because it reminded me of the Bebop and had a more workhorse feel to her)
Sadly, Canon keeps the Broadside out of our hands, But I did consider it.
@Des: The Salon pod holds 16 passengers. But on a Mando boat thats the first thing getting scrapped for something useful. Speed and maneuverability would probably be tweeked to modern day specifications. Otherwise, for maneuverability and speed we'd dump the external containers and run like hell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
