Welcome to Gaia! ::

Speaking of noobs, me & my boyfriend were watching X-Play yesterday, and one guy called in saying he couldn't wait for RE5 and that "its gonna be Survival Horror at its finest". I was like, "There's nothing Survival Horror about it." and my boyfriend agrees. He likes SUrvival Horror just as much as I do. What was funnier was that Adam & Morgan, being the noobs that they are, agreed with everything the caller was saying.

Yea, this is why I don't watch X-Play anymore. They don't really know what they're talking about and it just seems like they like anything that's really popular. stare

Are you guys even gonna play RE5...? xd

Bio, a question:

Highly doubtful, but what if they decide to make a Resident Evil 6 and return it to it's survival horror/zombie static cam format? Would you be interested to return to the series then? If so, what would you do if you needed to know what happened in 5 to figure out whats happening in 6?

No, I simply refuse to take what's been introduced in RE4 into the storyline. RE5 is a simple byproduct of that. But I don't acknowledge the existence of Las Plagas or the entire Los Illuminados incident into my version of the RE canon.
The only way I'd go back to play RE games is if Capcom completely restarted the canon, Tomb Raider style. That, or created another branch of the canon like the Metal Gear Aci!d games, a Branch that happens, say, after RE3, and goes into a completely different, more Umbrella, Zombie, conspiracy oriented direction.

The storyline was by far the biggest factor of why I denounced Resident Evil. I could've let the over the shoulder go. And new enemies, if they were a bit more thought out. Not just, "It's an ancient parasite that grows into a gigantic spider like creature which is super fast and completely stable, and that's just how it is." I mean, imagine if the new enemy in Resident Evil was something like the parasite in Cold Fear but without the Alien Factor. I mean, that game's enemies were what RE4 should've been. They were zombie-like, but ridiculously fast and could use weapons. Those guys were genuinely scary, and a lot more believable.

Not happening copy write thingy...I suck at spelling....then again ideas can't be copyrighted....how do I do that? I think ofthe word and misspell it and then when I don't think of it I spell it right....anyways, I think bio would be satified as he said. They would have to create a game that would start from where RE3 left off, and nothign in the game can acknowledge that the RE4 canon was ever created. static cams back, faster zombies to make it a bit scarier, also take out leon, he's nothing but apretty boy they put into the gme to bring in the stupid fangirls. and if there is a second person make an npc that you can't control, that way it's a bit scarier.

Yeah. They originally told us that the enemies in RE5 were gonna be zombies. Fast zombies, but zombies nonetheless. stare

I'm still curious as to what they're gonna do with it. And I'm still *hoping* that it's going to have more to do with Umbrella, and that they will throw in some of the old RE enemies that we know and love. Seriously, what would a few Hunters or something here and there hurt? A guy can dream... so I'm what you would call cautiously optimistic about RE5.

I hope it will deliver what RE4 lacked in terms of story.

@Bio: I can dig that, but it ain't gonna happen, at least, not for a while.

@Alkaizer: Keep Leon IN. You keep on forgetting RE2, were he wasn't some 'Effing pretty boy.

In one of the trailers, they played a clip where Chris says something like, "These creatures resemble the Ganados in the Kennedy report."

Right, so that's even more to the point, that even as unrealistic as Rocky was, he STILL wouldn't lay out a pack of guys with a single punch.