|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:23 pm
You haven't been thrown out yet either, with your sith-y gandalf dude.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:09 pm
No, we don't have a time-limit policy. Although, I wouldn't mind cale's imput on this, because he'll be affected too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:10 pm
I think we should add said policy.
That would help move this forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:22 pm
That would mean killing off old characters. That could lead to problems elsewhere...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:27 pm
No, it would just mean ignoring them. They came too late.
Just missed it all, or just disappeared. Don't have to go around killing off people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:30 pm
And then they come back, oblivious to the advances in the RP, and everything gets messed up.
Yeah, once a character is left behind in the dust, I'd rather it stays there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:34 pm
*shrugs*
Beats bringing the RP to a standstill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:38 pm
Letting people back in with the same characters of great power like Johnny's char also coudl bring a standstill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:40 pm
Then let us write up a policy to deal with such situations. Without ifs or buts.
Be it strict enough to deal with the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:43 pm
need more than one or two people's opinions on the matter...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:46 pm
I'm surprised we dont already have one. Thats one of the base policies for Roleplays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:48 pm
We haven't had a need for it, that's why we never had one. People were more actively responsible for the events, and took roles appropriate to their position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 10:16 pm
I think that... this situation is unfair to those of us who are on everyday. I work 40hours a week and take classes and have a social life and I still post. I understand some people have s**t happen in their lives that keep them away, but I should have to suffer because of these events or their complacency.
I say... perhaps a GM posts for them to push them to the side, maybe a sickness or a personal trip or something, then the person regains control of the character when they show up and come back in. And it'll just be like they got home from vacation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:45 am
Des, I dont believe you have any weight in decisions regarding Cloak of the Sith.
You're not in it, as you've stated before you've dropped out.
And I back Jaden's opinion on the matter. I recently just contacted Ral who had been working six days a week and had his free time taken up by college paperwork.
He will post tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:58 am
Cale. I'm not speaking solely about CotS. stare
I'm speaking of a full-guild policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
