|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:58 am
Hmmm... Should I be making a female character?
bandwagonbandwagonbandwagonbandwagonbandwagonbandwagon
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:01 pm
Whatever you do, don't make him/her a pilot! I'm pretty sure Corporal Kerning would have a heart attack, stroke, and seizure simultaneously. ESPECIALLY if it were a female. His head would explode.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:05 pm
Ooh, encouragement to go through with my plan!
We'll make sure she's ridiculously attracitve. biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:23 pm
you guys DO realize teddo and I already HAD female characters, don't you?
Aside from that, i nether confirm nor deny anything.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 5:18 pm
That fact seemed to slip my mind...
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 6:05 pm
Hahahahahahaha
I ignore all facts, the world doesn't exist. It's a figment of your imagination.
So is all population.
Does anybody want proof?
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 7:46 pm
I'm up for a mental jog: have at it, SirBayer.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 8:44 pm
best psychology test evar:
The professor puts a chair on the desk, and asks the students to explain to him the chair does not exist. After reading through essay after essay, the professor gets to the best answer of them all. two simple words scratched on the paper: "What Chair?"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:06 pm
I have a much better one, and I will share it with you now:
Chemistry Mid-Term The following is an actual question given on a Washington State University chemistry mid-term. The answer by one of the students was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well. Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)? Most students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following: First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added. This gives two possibilities 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over. So which is it? If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting, "Oh my God!"
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:44 am
Okay.
Mine is very short, very simple.
Let us presume that there are infinite worlds, which we might as well, since there are clusters of galaxies and we don't know just how many there are.
Let us also presume that there is a finite number of inhabited worlds, which we know must be true.
A finite number divided by an infinite number is as close to zero as makes no difference.
Thus, the number of people over the number of worlds is 0. Thus, no people truly exist.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 12:46 pm
I like it, Bayer. Short. Concise.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 2:59 pm
Of COURSE you like it.
It's from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
Thus, you like it.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:37 pm
42? I love the midterm one. amazing. and you know what's sad? Quote: Teddo doesn't HAVE a feminine side! I got mistaken for a girl just this afternoon. My hair is a foot and a half long.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:05 pm
That doesn't mean you have a feminine side, Teddo. But that is humorous.
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:56 am
42
Isn't it funny how we can use science to prove things we know aren't true? And even prove things that don't make sense but are true? For example, .999999... is, in fact, one. Because we know that .33333... is 1/3. And we know that if we multiply it by three, we get 3/3, which is 1. But if we multiply .33333... by 3, we get .9999999... thus, .999999... must equal 1.
.99999... = 1
Makes so much sense! biggrin
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|